[Medication safety in German hospitals: An analysis of structured quality reports].

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Gesundheitswesen Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1055/a-2501-0241
Nadin Kastirke, Beatrice Groß
{"title":"[Medication safety in German hospitals: An analysis of structured quality reports].","authors":"Nadin Kastirke, Beatrice Groß","doi":"10.1055/a-2501-0241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Medication safety represents an increasingly pertinent aspect of quality and risk management in hospitals. However, little is known about the relevance of specific methods in controlling medication safety with respect to medical care processes. The aim of this study, therefore, is to assess the implementation of medication safety measures and the significance of specific hospital characteristics.We analyzed data from 2018, comprising structured quality reports of 1987 sites that were the first to contain information on 13 medication safety tools and measures. Relative implementation rates were assessed both in general and for subgroups. The latter were formed based on site size, presence of specialized departments as well as university hospital affiliation. The relevance of corresponding differences between subgroups was examined using threshold analysis.Across all 13 medication safety measures, implementation rates varied highly (gapless medication safety after hospital release: 71.4%; SOP for good prescription practice: 23.5%). Rates also increased in relation to site size from 31.5% (<50 hospital beds) to 61.5% (>500 hospital beds). This pattern was especially prevalent for medication safety measures pertaining to electronics and IT. There were significant differences between eight measures based on the presence of specialized departments as well as university hospital affiliation. Two measures (medication safety training, description of optimal medication processes) did not vary with the hospital characteristics.Our results highlight the importance of standardized assessments of quality assurance data in hospital settings. The present data analysis enables the identification of those measures that have already been implemented. Implementation seems to be associated with hospital characteristics as well as regulatory guidelines. However, it is noteworthy that medication safety measures are not being implemented across the board. This might be explained by economic, social and technological barriers. These hurdles should be dealt with on a long-term basis and via adequate incentives.</p>","PeriodicalId":47653,"journal":{"name":"Gesundheitswesen","volume":" ","pages":"193-201"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gesundheitswesen","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2501-0241","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Medication safety represents an increasingly pertinent aspect of quality and risk management in hospitals. However, little is known about the relevance of specific methods in controlling medication safety with respect to medical care processes. The aim of this study, therefore, is to assess the implementation of medication safety measures and the significance of specific hospital characteristics.We analyzed data from 2018, comprising structured quality reports of 1987 sites that were the first to contain information on 13 medication safety tools and measures. Relative implementation rates were assessed both in general and for subgroups. The latter were formed based on site size, presence of specialized departments as well as university hospital affiliation. The relevance of corresponding differences between subgroups was examined using threshold analysis.Across all 13 medication safety measures, implementation rates varied highly (gapless medication safety after hospital release: 71.4%; SOP for good prescription practice: 23.5%). Rates also increased in relation to site size from 31.5% (<50 hospital beds) to 61.5% (>500 hospital beds). This pattern was especially prevalent for medication safety measures pertaining to electronics and IT. There were significant differences between eight measures based on the presence of specialized departments as well as university hospital affiliation. Two measures (medication safety training, description of optimal medication processes) did not vary with the hospital characteristics.Our results highlight the importance of standardized assessments of quality assurance data in hospital settings. The present data analysis enables the identification of those measures that have already been implemented. Implementation seems to be associated with hospital characteristics as well as regulatory guidelines. However, it is noteworthy that medication safety measures are not being implemented across the board. This might be explained by economic, social and technological barriers. These hurdles should be dealt with on a long-term basis and via adequate incentives.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gesundheitswesen
Gesundheitswesen PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
18.20%
发文量
308
期刊介绍: The health service informs you comprehensively and up-to-date about the most important topics of the health care system. In addition to guidelines, overviews and comments, you will find current research results and contributions to CME-certified continuing education and training. The journal offers a scientific discussion forum and a platform for communications from professional societies. The content quality is ensured by a publisher body, the expert advisory board and other experts in the peer review process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信