Costs and Effects of Ineffective Wayfinding in US Hospitals: A Survey of Hospital Staff.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Saman Jamshidi, Seyedehnastaran Hashemi, Dieu-My T Tran
{"title":"Costs and Effects of Ineffective Wayfinding in US Hospitals: A Survey of Hospital Staff.","authors":"Saman Jamshidi, Seyedehnastaran Hashemi, Dieu-My T Tran","doi":"10.1177/19375867251317240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> This article assesses the magnitude and impact of wayfinding problems in US hospitals as perceived by staff. <b>Background:</b> Problematic wayfinding in healthcare facilities is a persistent issue, leading to frustration, stress, fatigue, physical aggression, wasted time, and a negative organizational image. Despite anecdotal evidence, few studies have quantified the impacts of wayfinding problems. <b>Methods:</b> This descriptive cross-sectional study used an online questionnaire to gather data from hospital staff in the United States. The questionnaire targeted (1) wayfinding for hospital staff, (2) wayfinding for hospital visitors, (3) the impact of wayfinding problems on staff, and (4) the importance of addressing wayfinding problems. Data from 301 questionnaires were analyzed using descriptive and nonparametric statistics. <b>Results:</b> Staff found it easy to navigate their own departments but more difficult to navigate other departments. Staff's responses indicated that wayfinding was relatively difficult for visitors. Each staff member spent about 30 min per week on helping others with wayfinding. The five locations in which users needed the most assistance were the cafeteria, restrooms, elevators, exits, and main lobby. Staff commonly escorted people to a point from which they could independently reach their destination. Wayfinding difficulties could distract staff from their main duties and cause frustration. Nearly 44% of the participants experienced incivility from users who had become frustrated by wayfinding problems. Participants rated addressing wayfinding problems as very important. <b>Conclusions:</b> Despite the extensive literature on the environmental factors that influence wayfinding, this study finds that hospital visitors in the United States still struggle with wayfinding, which indicates a potential gap between design research and practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":47306,"journal":{"name":"Herd-Health Environments Research & Design Journal","volume":" ","pages":"463-479"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Herd-Health Environments Research & Design Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19375867251317240","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This article assesses the magnitude and impact of wayfinding problems in US hospitals as perceived by staff. Background: Problematic wayfinding in healthcare facilities is a persistent issue, leading to frustration, stress, fatigue, physical aggression, wasted time, and a negative organizational image. Despite anecdotal evidence, few studies have quantified the impacts of wayfinding problems. Methods: This descriptive cross-sectional study used an online questionnaire to gather data from hospital staff in the United States. The questionnaire targeted (1) wayfinding for hospital staff, (2) wayfinding for hospital visitors, (3) the impact of wayfinding problems on staff, and (4) the importance of addressing wayfinding problems. Data from 301 questionnaires were analyzed using descriptive and nonparametric statistics. Results: Staff found it easy to navigate their own departments but more difficult to navigate other departments. Staff's responses indicated that wayfinding was relatively difficult for visitors. Each staff member spent about 30 min per week on helping others with wayfinding. The five locations in which users needed the most assistance were the cafeteria, restrooms, elevators, exits, and main lobby. Staff commonly escorted people to a point from which they could independently reach their destination. Wayfinding difficulties could distract staff from their main duties and cause frustration. Nearly 44% of the participants experienced incivility from users who had become frustrated by wayfinding problems. Participants rated addressing wayfinding problems as very important. Conclusions: Despite the extensive literature on the environmental factors that influence wayfinding, this study finds that hospital visitors in the United States still struggle with wayfinding, which indicates a potential gap between design research and practice.

美国医院无效寻路的成本和影响:对医院员工的调查。
目的:本文评估了美国医院员工所感知的寻路问题的大小和影响。背景:在医疗保健机构中,有问题的寻路是一个长期存在的问题,导致沮丧、压力、疲劳、身体攻击、浪费时间和负面的组织形象。尽管有轶事证据,但很少有研究量化寻路问题的影响。方法:本描述性横断面研究采用在线问卷收集美国医院工作人员的数据。问卷针对(1)医院工作人员的寻路,(2)医院访客的寻路,(3)寻路问题对工作人员的影响,(4)解决寻路问题的重要性。采用描述性和非参数统计对301份问卷的数据进行分析。结果:员工发现自己的部门很容易导航,但其他部门更难导航。工作人员的反应表明,对游客来说,找路相对困难。每个工作人员每周花大约30分钟帮助别人找路。用户最需要帮助的五个地点是自助餐厅、洗手间、电梯、出口和主要大厅。工作人员通常会护送人们到一个他们可以独立到达目的地的地方。寻路困难可能会分散员工的主要职责,并造成挫折感。近44%的参与者经历过因寻路问题而感到沮丧的用户的不礼貌行为。参与者认为解决寻路问题非常重要。结论:尽管有大量关于环境因素影响寻路的文献,但本研究发现,美国的医院访客仍然在寻路方面挣扎,这表明设计研究与实践之间存在潜在差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Herd-Health Environments Research & Design Journal
Herd-Health Environments Research & Design Journal PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
22.70%
发文量
82
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信