Changes in Pregabalin Dispensing to Australians with Workers' Compensation Claims for Low Back Pain Following the Listing of Pregabalin on the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Michael F Di Donato, Christina Abdel Shaheed, Alex Collie, Christopher G Maher, Stephanie Mathieson
{"title":"Changes in Pregabalin Dispensing to Australians with Workers' Compensation Claims for Low Back Pain Following the Listing of Pregabalin on the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme.","authors":"Michael F Di Donato, Christina Abdel Shaheed, Alex Collie, Christopher G Maher, Stephanie Mathieson","doi":"10.1007/s10926-025-10276-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We sought to identify whether the inclusion of pregabalin on the list of medicines subsidised by the Australian government in 2013 resulted in changes to the dispensing of pregabalin to Australians with workers' compensation claims for low back pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a sample of workers' compensation claims and payments data (2010-2018), we measured the prevalence of pregabalin dispensing and time to first pregabalin dispensing in workers whose claim began before, during or after pregabalin was listed on the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) with binary logistic and Cox proportional hazards models. We used interrupted time-series analyses to measure changes in the monthly number, percentage of pain medicines, percentage of gabapentinoid dispensings, and median cost per dispensing of pregabalin.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 17,689 workers included in the study, 13.7% (n = 2431) were dispensed pregabalin during the study period. Workers in the groups whose claim occurred before or during when pregabalin was listed on the PBS were at significantly lower odds of being dispensed pregabalin than the group whose claim began after PBS listing (OR 0.20, 99% CI 0.15, 0.25 and OR 0.40, 99% CI 0.33, 0.48, respectively). There were significant step increases in the number of pregabalin dispensings (26.3%, 99% CI 6.2%, 50.3%), percentage of pain medicines that were pregabalin (29.3%, 99% CI 1.5%, 64.9%), and percentage of gabapentinoid dispensings that were pregabalin (13.9%, 99% CI 7.5%, 20.6%). There was a significant step decrease in the median cost per pregabalin dispensing (- 61.8%, 99% CI - 66.8%, - 56.1%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Listing pregabalin on the PBS saw significant increases in the prevalence, number and percentage of pain medicines, and significant decreases in time to first pregabalin dispensing and cost.</p>","PeriodicalId":48035,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-025-10276-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: We sought to identify whether the inclusion of pregabalin on the list of medicines subsidised by the Australian government in 2013 resulted in changes to the dispensing of pregabalin to Australians with workers' compensation claims for low back pain.

Methods: Using a sample of workers' compensation claims and payments data (2010-2018), we measured the prevalence of pregabalin dispensing and time to first pregabalin dispensing in workers whose claim began before, during or after pregabalin was listed on the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) with binary logistic and Cox proportional hazards models. We used interrupted time-series analyses to measure changes in the monthly number, percentage of pain medicines, percentage of gabapentinoid dispensings, and median cost per dispensing of pregabalin.

Results: Of the 17,689 workers included in the study, 13.7% (n = 2431) were dispensed pregabalin during the study period. Workers in the groups whose claim occurred before or during when pregabalin was listed on the PBS were at significantly lower odds of being dispensed pregabalin than the group whose claim began after PBS listing (OR 0.20, 99% CI 0.15, 0.25 and OR 0.40, 99% CI 0.33, 0.48, respectively). There were significant step increases in the number of pregabalin dispensings (26.3%, 99% CI 6.2%, 50.3%), percentage of pain medicines that were pregabalin (29.3%, 99% CI 1.5%, 64.9%), and percentage of gabapentinoid dispensings that were pregabalin (13.9%, 99% CI 7.5%, 20.6%). There was a significant step decrease in the median cost per pregabalin dispensing (- 61.8%, 99% CI - 66.8%, - 56.1%).

Conclusion: Listing pregabalin on the PBS saw significant increases in the prevalence, number and percentage of pain medicines, and significant decreases in time to first pregabalin dispensing and cost.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
12.10%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: The Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation is an international forum for the publication of peer-reviewed original papers on the rehabilitation, reintegration, and prevention of disability in workers. The journal offers investigations involving original data collection and research synthesis (i.e., scoping reviews, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses). Papers derive from a broad array of fields including rehabilitation medicine, physical and occupational therapy, health psychology and psychiatry, orthopedics, oncology, occupational and insurance medicine, neurology, social work, ergonomics, biomedical engineering, health economics, rehabilitation engineering, business administration and management, and law.  A single interdisciplinary source for information on work disability rehabilitation, the Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation helps to advance the scientific understanding, management, and prevention of work disability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信