Development of a PowerPoint Rubric for Doctor of Nursing Practice Projects.

IF 0.2 Q4 NURSING
Zane Robinson Wolf, Jeannine Uribe
{"title":"Development of a PowerPoint Rubric for Doctor of Nursing Practice Projects.","authors":"Zane Robinson Wolf, Jeannine Uribe","doi":"10.1891/JDNP-2023-0062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Although Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) students have used rubrics to guide assignments, few have created PowerPoint slide decks for professional presentations. Students might benefit from a rubric that standardizes PowerPoint presentations on final DNP projects. <b>Objective:</b> The objective of the study is to conduct a quality improvement project to evaluate a literature-based rubric guiding students' PowerPoint presentations and the grading of final projects. <b>Methods:</b> Two faculty independently scored PowerPoint slides structuring final DNP project presentations for the literature-based rubric. They revised the rubric based on ratings and comments. Nine content experts rated the relevance of the revised rubric's criteria. <b>Results:</b> Three criteria differed at a statistically different level on the literature-based rubric's ratings. Interrater reliability was low. The rubric criteria were revised. Nine experts' ratings showed criteria on the revised rubric were relevant; their comments stimulated revisions. The Survey Content Validity Average was 0.88, suggesting the relevance of criteria. <b>Conclusions:</b> The rubric requires additional revisions. Posting the revised rubric in the student resource course of the learning management system might assist students to construct PowerPoint presentations in DNP courses and for professional presentations. <b>Implications for Nursing:</b> The rubric was shared with DNP Project Teams. Faculty will continue to evaluate the quality of the students' presentations.</p>","PeriodicalId":40310,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Doctoral Nursing Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Doctoral Nursing Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1891/JDNP-2023-0062","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) students have used rubrics to guide assignments, few have created PowerPoint slide decks for professional presentations. Students might benefit from a rubric that standardizes PowerPoint presentations on final DNP projects. Objective: The objective of the study is to conduct a quality improvement project to evaluate a literature-based rubric guiding students' PowerPoint presentations and the grading of final projects. Methods: Two faculty independently scored PowerPoint slides structuring final DNP project presentations for the literature-based rubric. They revised the rubric based on ratings and comments. Nine content experts rated the relevance of the revised rubric's criteria. Results: Three criteria differed at a statistically different level on the literature-based rubric's ratings. Interrater reliability was low. The rubric criteria were revised. Nine experts' ratings showed criteria on the revised rubric were relevant; their comments stimulated revisions. The Survey Content Validity Average was 0.88, suggesting the relevance of criteria. Conclusions: The rubric requires additional revisions. Posting the revised rubric in the student resource course of the learning management system might assist students to construct PowerPoint presentations in DNP courses and for professional presentations. Implications for Nursing: The rubric was shared with DNP Project Teams. Faculty will continue to evaluate the quality of the students' presentations.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信