Efficacy and safety of different doses of gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogues in the treatment of precocious puberty in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Translational pediatrics Pub Date : 2025-01-24 Epub Date: 2025-01-21 DOI:10.21037/tp-24-439
Peipei Jin, Yu Zhang, Xueqiong Zhu, Anle Wu
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of different doses of gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogues in the treatment of precocious puberty in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Peipei Jin, Yu Zhang, Xueqiong Zhu, Anle Wu","doi":"10.21037/tp-24-439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Precocious puberty comprises a group of disorders characterized by abnormal pubertal development that significantly impacts children's physical and mental health. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue (GnRHa) is the standard treatment; however, the efficacy and safety of different dosages remain uncertain. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of various GnRHa doses for preventing and treating precocious puberty in children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Relevant studies published up to September 2024 were searched across seven electronic databases. Literature that met the inclusion criteria was reviewed to compare the effects of low-dose versus high-dose GnRHa on bone age, predicted adult height (PAH), bone metabolism indices, sex hormone levels, and safety in children with precocious puberty. The risk of bias for the included studies was assessed in accordance with the guidelines for bias assessment provided in the Cochrane Handbook. And data were quantitatively analyzed using RevMan 5.3 software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen studies involving 686 children were included in this analysis. The overall quality of the included studies was moderate. Meta-analysis indicated no significant differences between low-dose and high-dose GnRHa regarding changes in bone age [mean difference (MD) =0.10, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.00 to 0.16, P=0.06], predicting adult heights (PAH) (MD =-0.14, 95% CI: -1.23 to 0.96, P=0.06). However, the low-dose group showed a more significant effect on luteinizing hormone (LH) (MD =0.10, 95% CI: 0.03 to 0.18, P=0.009), while the high-dose group had a more pronounced impact on P1NP (MD =-36.03, 95% CI: -57.63 to -14.43, P=0.001). Additionally, adverse reaction rates were significantly lower in the low-dose group (odds ratio =0.21, 95% CI: 0.13 to 0.33, P<0.001) compared to the high-dose group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This meta-analysis suggests that low-dose GnRHa is as effective as higher doses for treating precocious puberty in children and presents a better safety profile. These findings provide evidence-based guidance for selecting GnRHa dosages in clinical applications for managing childhood precocious puberty.</p>","PeriodicalId":23294,"journal":{"name":"Translational pediatrics","volume":"14 1","pages":"92-103"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11811583/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/tp-24-439","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Precocious puberty comprises a group of disorders characterized by abnormal pubertal development that significantly impacts children's physical and mental health. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue (GnRHa) is the standard treatment; however, the efficacy and safety of different dosages remain uncertain. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of various GnRHa doses for preventing and treating precocious puberty in children.

Methods: Relevant studies published up to September 2024 were searched across seven electronic databases. Literature that met the inclusion criteria was reviewed to compare the effects of low-dose versus high-dose GnRHa on bone age, predicted adult height (PAH), bone metabolism indices, sex hormone levels, and safety in children with precocious puberty. The risk of bias for the included studies was assessed in accordance with the guidelines for bias assessment provided in the Cochrane Handbook. And data were quantitatively analyzed using RevMan 5.3 software.

Results: Thirteen studies involving 686 children were included in this analysis. The overall quality of the included studies was moderate. Meta-analysis indicated no significant differences between low-dose and high-dose GnRHa regarding changes in bone age [mean difference (MD) =0.10, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.00 to 0.16, P=0.06], predicting adult heights (PAH) (MD =-0.14, 95% CI: -1.23 to 0.96, P=0.06). However, the low-dose group showed a more significant effect on luteinizing hormone (LH) (MD =0.10, 95% CI: 0.03 to 0.18, P=0.009), while the high-dose group had a more pronounced impact on P1NP (MD =-36.03, 95% CI: -57.63 to -14.43, P=0.001). Additionally, adverse reaction rates were significantly lower in the low-dose group (odds ratio =0.21, 95% CI: 0.13 to 0.33, P<0.001) compared to the high-dose group.

Conclusions: This meta-analysis suggests that low-dose GnRHa is as effective as higher doses for treating precocious puberty in children and presents a better safety profile. These findings provide evidence-based guidance for selecting GnRHa dosages in clinical applications for managing childhood precocious puberty.

不同剂量促性腺激素释放激素类似物治疗儿童性早熟的疗效和安全性:系统综述和荟萃分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Translational pediatrics
Translational pediatrics Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
108
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信