The Role of Crutches and Bracing in Preventing Secondary Meniscal Tears After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury in Pediatric Patients.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-06 eCollection Date: 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1177/23259671241309862
Arjun Gupta, Daniel Badin, R Jay Lee
{"title":"The Role of Crutches and Bracing in Preventing Secondary Meniscal Tears After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury in Pediatric Patients.","authors":"Arjun Gupta, Daniel Badin, R Jay Lee","doi":"10.1177/23259671241309862","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Secondary meniscal tears are a well-described sequela of delay in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) after ACL injury. This study aimed to evaluate whether preoperative conservative interventions (ie, crutches, bracing, and physical therapy) are associated with a reduced risk of secondary meniscal pathology in pediatric patients.</p><p><strong>Hypothesis: </strong>Preoperative conservative interventions of the ACL-deficient knee would be associated with fewer secondary meniscal tears in pediatric patients undergoing delayed (≥8 weeks postinjury) ACLR.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All pediatric patients (age, <18 years) undergoing primary ACLR with a single surgeon between October 1, 2013, and January 31, 2022, were retrospectively identified. The exclusion criteria were as follows: previous ipsilateral knee injury; multiligamentous knee injuries; or time frommagnetic resonance imaging to surgery ≥52 weeks. Adherence to conservative management recommendations (ie, crutches, bracing, and physical therapy) was assessed through medical record review. Secondary meniscal injuries were defined as major tears that were discovered intraoperatively and required repair or substantial meniscectomy. Meniscal tears that occurred concomitantly with ACL rupture and were detectable on the initial (<3 weeks after injury) magnetic resonance imaging scans were not considered secondary. In total, 71 pediatric patients (35 girls; 36 boys) were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 70 patients (99%) underwent ≥1 conservative interventions before ACLR-including 37 (52%) who used crutches, 47 (66%) who used bracing, and 69 (97%) who received physical therapy. There were no differences in use of conservative interventions between those who underwent early ACLR and those who had delayed ACLR (<i>P</i> > .05). Delayed ACLR was associated with a greater risk of medial, but not lateral, meniscal tears compared with early ACLR (<i>P</i> = .04). Overall, 15 secondary meniscal tears were observed intraoperatively in 14 patients-including 4 medial and 11 lateral tears. Knee bracing was associated with fewer lateral meniscal tears in patients undergoing early ACLR (6% vs 35%; <i>P</i> = .008), with multivariate regression analysis yielding an adjusted odds ratio of 0.06 (95% CI, 0.006-0.57; <i>P</i> = .015). The use of crutches was associated with fewer medial meniscal tears in patients undergoing delayed ACLR (0% vs 37%; <i>P</i> = .017). Since no new medial meniscal tears were observed in patients who used crutches, the adjusted odds ratio could not be calculated.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Bracing and crutches were associated with the preservation of the menisci in the ACL-deficient knee in pediatric patients undergoing early and delayed ACLR, respectively. Surgeons should strongly encourage adherence to these conservative modalities in patients awaiting operative reconstruction to reduce the risk of secondary meniscal pathology.</p>","PeriodicalId":19646,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"13 2","pages":"23259671241309862"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11816115/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671241309862","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Secondary meniscal tears are a well-described sequela of delay in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) after ACL injury. This study aimed to evaluate whether preoperative conservative interventions (ie, crutches, bracing, and physical therapy) are associated with a reduced risk of secondary meniscal pathology in pediatric patients.

Hypothesis: Preoperative conservative interventions of the ACL-deficient knee would be associated with fewer secondary meniscal tears in pediatric patients undergoing delayed (≥8 weeks postinjury) ACLR.

Study design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods: All pediatric patients (age, <18 years) undergoing primary ACLR with a single surgeon between October 1, 2013, and January 31, 2022, were retrospectively identified. The exclusion criteria were as follows: previous ipsilateral knee injury; multiligamentous knee injuries; or time frommagnetic resonance imaging to surgery ≥52 weeks. Adherence to conservative management recommendations (ie, crutches, bracing, and physical therapy) was assessed through medical record review. Secondary meniscal injuries were defined as major tears that were discovered intraoperatively and required repair or substantial meniscectomy. Meniscal tears that occurred concomitantly with ACL rupture and were detectable on the initial (<3 weeks after injury) magnetic resonance imaging scans were not considered secondary. In total, 71 pediatric patients (35 girls; 36 boys) were included.

Results: A total of 70 patients (99%) underwent ≥1 conservative interventions before ACLR-including 37 (52%) who used crutches, 47 (66%) who used bracing, and 69 (97%) who received physical therapy. There were no differences in use of conservative interventions between those who underwent early ACLR and those who had delayed ACLR (P > .05). Delayed ACLR was associated with a greater risk of medial, but not lateral, meniscal tears compared with early ACLR (P = .04). Overall, 15 secondary meniscal tears were observed intraoperatively in 14 patients-including 4 medial and 11 lateral tears. Knee bracing was associated with fewer lateral meniscal tears in patients undergoing early ACLR (6% vs 35%; P = .008), with multivariate regression analysis yielding an adjusted odds ratio of 0.06 (95% CI, 0.006-0.57; P = .015). The use of crutches was associated with fewer medial meniscal tears in patients undergoing delayed ACLR (0% vs 37%; P = .017). Since no new medial meniscal tears were observed in patients who used crutches, the adjusted odds ratio could not be calculated.

Conclusion: Bracing and crutches were associated with the preservation of the menisci in the ACL-deficient knee in pediatric patients undergoing early and delayed ACLR, respectively. Surgeons should strongly encourage adherence to these conservative modalities in patients awaiting operative reconstruction to reduce the risk of secondary meniscal pathology.

拐杖和支具在预防小儿前交叉韧带损伤后继发性半月板撕裂中的作用。
背景:继发性半月板撕裂是前交叉韧带(ACL)损伤后延迟重建(ACLR)的后遗症。本研究旨在评估术前保守干预(即拐杖、支具和物理治疗)是否与降低儿科患者继发性半月板病理风险相关。假设:对于延迟(损伤后≥8周)ACLR的儿童患者,术前对缺乏acl的膝关节进行保守干预可减少继发性半月板撕裂。研究设计:队列研究;证据水平,3。结果:共有70例患者(99%)在aclr前接受了≥1次保守干预,其中37例(52%)使用拐杖,47例(66%)使用支具,69例(97%)接受物理治疗。在早期ACLR患者和延迟ACLR患者之间,保守干预的使用没有差异(P < 0.05)。与早期ACLR相比,延迟ACLR与内侧半月板撕裂的风险更高,而不是外侧半月板撕裂(P = 0.04)。总的来说,14例患者术中观察到15例继发性半月板撕裂,其中4例内侧撕裂,11例外侧撕裂。膝关节支具与早期ACLR患者外侧半月板撕裂减少相关(6% vs 35%;P = 0.008),多因素回归分析得出校正优势比为0.06 (95% CI, 0.006-0.57;P = .015)。在迟发性ACLR患者中,拐杖的使用与内侧半月板撕裂的减少相关(0% vs 37%;P = .017)。由于使用拐杖的患者未观察到新的内侧半月板撕裂,因此无法计算调整后的优势比。结论:支具和拐杖分别与早期和延迟ACLR患儿acl缺失膝关节的半月板保存相关。外科医生应强烈鼓励等待手术重建的患者坚持这些保守模式,以降低继发性半月板病理的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
876
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine (OJSM), developed by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM), is a global, peer-reviewed, open access journal that combines the interests of researchers and clinical practitioners across orthopaedic sports medicine, arthroscopy, and knee arthroplasty. Topics include original research in the areas of: -Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, including surgical and nonsurgical treatment of orthopaedic sports injuries -Arthroscopic Surgery (Shoulder/Elbow/Wrist/Hip/Knee/Ankle/Foot) -Relevant translational research -Sports traumatology/epidemiology -Knee and shoulder arthroplasty The OJSM also publishes relevant systematic reviews and meta-analyses. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信