Bacterial Dacryoadenitis With Abscess: Meta-Analysis of Features and Outcomes of a Rare Clinical Entity.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
James Pietris, Clare Quigley, Lydia Lam, Dinesh Selva
{"title":"Bacterial Dacryoadenitis With Abscess: Meta-Analysis of Features and Outcomes of a Rare Clinical Entity.","authors":"James Pietris, Clare Quigley, Lydia Lam, Dinesh Selva","doi":"10.1097/IOP.0000000000002924","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Bacterial dacryoadenitis with abscess is rare. There is limited evidence examining the clinical course, and there is no consensus on evidence-based management protocols. The authors aim to systematically review the current literature on bacterial dacryoadenitis with abscess, examining etiology, clinical and radiological features, management, and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of the databases PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL was performed to July 2024, prior to data collection and risk of bias analysis in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-five articles met the inclusion criteria. Fifty-one cases of bacterial dacryoadenitis complicated by abscess were identified, mean age 34.5 ± 22.3 years including n = 17 females (40.4%, subgroup with full demographic data, n = 42). Methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus was identified as the most common causative organism (25.4%), followed by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (17.9%) and Haemophilus influenzae (12.8%). Clinical features included upper eyelid swelling (74.5%) and pain (39.2%), along with extraocular movement restriction (58.8%), gaze-evoked pain (39.2%), erythema (45%), chemosis (41.1%), and lacrimal gland protrusion (19.6%). A well-defined, rim-enhancing lesion within an enlarged lacrimal gland was typical on imaging (seen in 33.3%). The majority were managed with abscess drainage with concurrent intravenous antibiotics (66.6%). Only 1 patient among the included studies suffered a recurrence. Abscess drainage was not associated with patient age (p = 0. 8) or with Staphylococcus aureus as the causative organism (p = 0.7).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Bacterial dacryoadenitis with abscess is a rare but potentially sight-threatening entity. Requirement for abscess drainage in bacterial dacryoadenitis was not associated with patient age, nor with the most common causative bacteria. Clinicians should be aware of the potential for compressive optic neuropathy, and alert to signs that may indicate surgical drainage, in particular, inadequate response to antibiotics.</p>","PeriodicalId":19588,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/IOP.0000000000002924","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Bacterial dacryoadenitis with abscess is rare. There is limited evidence examining the clinical course, and there is no consensus on evidence-based management protocols. The authors aim to systematically review the current literature on bacterial dacryoadenitis with abscess, examining etiology, clinical and radiological features, management, and outcomes.

Methods: A systematic search of the databases PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL was performed to July 2024, prior to data collection and risk of bias analysis in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.

Results: Twenty-five articles met the inclusion criteria. Fifty-one cases of bacterial dacryoadenitis complicated by abscess were identified, mean age 34.5 ± 22.3 years including n = 17 females (40.4%, subgroup with full demographic data, n = 42). Methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus was identified as the most common causative organism (25.4%), followed by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (17.9%) and Haemophilus influenzae (12.8%). Clinical features included upper eyelid swelling (74.5%) and pain (39.2%), along with extraocular movement restriction (58.8%), gaze-evoked pain (39.2%), erythema (45%), chemosis (41.1%), and lacrimal gland protrusion (19.6%). A well-defined, rim-enhancing lesion within an enlarged lacrimal gland was typical on imaging (seen in 33.3%). The majority were managed with abscess drainage with concurrent intravenous antibiotics (66.6%). Only 1 patient among the included studies suffered a recurrence. Abscess drainage was not associated with patient age (p = 0. 8) or with Staphylococcus aureus as the causative organism (p = 0.7).

Conclusions: Bacterial dacryoadenitis with abscess is a rare but potentially sight-threatening entity. Requirement for abscess drainage in bacterial dacryoadenitis was not associated with patient age, nor with the most common causative bacteria. Clinicians should be aware of the potential for compressive optic neuropathy, and alert to signs that may indicate surgical drainage, in particular, inadequate response to antibiotics.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
322
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery features original articles and reviews on topics such as ptosis, eyelid reconstruction, orbital diagnosis and surgery, lacrimal problems, and eyelid malposition. Update reports on diagnostic techniques, surgical equipment and instrumentation, and medical therapies are included, as well as detailed analyses of recent research findings and their clinical applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信