Efficiency of Cephalic Vein Only Anastomosis During Radial Forearm Free Flap.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Dorsa Mousa-Doust, Khanh Linh Tran, Anat Bahat-Dinur, Jamie Jae Young Kwon, Emily C Deane, Donald W Anderson, J Scott Durham, Eitan Prisman
{"title":"Efficiency of Cephalic Vein Only Anastomosis During Radial Forearm Free Flap.","authors":"Dorsa Mousa-Doust, Khanh Linh Tran, Anat Bahat-Dinur, Jamie Jae Young Kwon, Emily C Deane, Donald W Anderson, J Scott Durham, Eitan Prisman","doi":"10.1177/19160216241307547","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>The closure technique for the radial forearm free flap (RFFF), a commonly utilized flap in head and neck reconstruction, remains a debated topic as there are unique advantages and drawbacks to each technique.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The present study aims to report on the outcomes of the closure of the RFFF with the superficial cephalic vein (CV)-only system in terms of venous compromise and flap survival.</p><p><strong>Methods (design, setting, participants, intervention, measures): </strong>A retrospective review of patients who underwent head and neck reconstruction with RFFF between January 2015 and May 2021 at the authors' institution was performed. Cases were categorized as superficial, dual, and deep systems. Multiple population and operative variables were collected for the study group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 221 cases of RFFF were included, of which 169 (76.5%) cases were performed using the CV alone, whereas the remaining 52 (22.5%) cases utilized either the dual or the deep system alone. The operative time in the superficial group was 265 minutes. There were 9 venous complications in the CV group, of which 5 required re-exploration in the operating room and 4 were treated conservatively. All venous-related flap complications were salvaged.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and relevance: </strong>A majority of the RFFF cases could successfully be completed using the CV as the sole venous drainage, with high rates of flap survival, low complications, and low operative time.</p>","PeriodicalId":16615,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery","volume":"54 ","pages":"19160216241307547"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11822809/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19160216241307547","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: The closure technique for the radial forearm free flap (RFFF), a commonly utilized flap in head and neck reconstruction, remains a debated topic as there are unique advantages and drawbacks to each technique.

Objective: The present study aims to report on the outcomes of the closure of the RFFF with the superficial cephalic vein (CV)-only system in terms of venous compromise and flap survival.

Methods (design, setting, participants, intervention, measures): A retrospective review of patients who underwent head and neck reconstruction with RFFF between January 2015 and May 2021 at the authors' institution was performed. Cases were categorized as superficial, dual, and deep systems. Multiple population and operative variables were collected for the study group.

Results: In total, 221 cases of RFFF were included, of which 169 (76.5%) cases were performed using the CV alone, whereas the remaining 52 (22.5%) cases utilized either the dual or the deep system alone. The operative time in the superficial group was 265 minutes. There were 9 venous complications in the CV group, of which 5 required re-exploration in the operating room and 4 were treated conservatively. All venous-related flap complications were salvaged.

Conclusion and relevance: A majority of the RFFF cases could successfully be completed using the CV as the sole venous drainage, with high rates of flap survival, low complications, and low operative time.

前臂桡骨游离皮瓣吻合头静脉的效果。
重要性:桡骨前臂自由皮瓣(RFFF)的闭合技术是头颈部重建中常用的皮瓣,由于每种技术都有其独特的优点和缺点,因此仍然是一个有争议的话题。目的:本研究旨在报道仅使用头浅静脉(CV)系统关闭RFFF在静脉损伤和皮瓣存活方面的结果。方法(设计、环境、参与者、干预、措施):对2015年1月至2021年5月在作者所在机构接受RFFF头颈部重建术的患者进行回顾性分析。病例分为浅表、双系统和深层系统。研究组收集了多个人群和手术变量。结果:共纳入221例RFFF,其中单独使用CV的169例(76.5%),单独使用双系统或深层系统的52例(22.5%)。浅表组手术时间265分钟。CV组共发生静脉并发症9例,其中5例需在手术室重新探查,4例采取保守治疗。所有静脉相关皮瓣并发症均予以抢救。结论及意义:绝大多数RFFF病例采用CV作为唯一静脉引流,皮瓣成活率高,并发症少,手术时间短。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery is an open access, peer-reviewed journal publishing on all aspects and sub-specialties of otolaryngology-head & neck surgery, including pediatric and geriatric otolaryngology, rhinology & anterior skull base surgery, otology/neurotology, facial plastic & reconstructive surgery, head & neck oncology, and maxillofacial rehabilitation, as well as a broad range of related topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信