US Abortion Bans and Fertility.

Q1 Medicine
Suzanne O Bell, Alexander M Franks, David Arbour, Selena Anjur-Dietrich, Elizabeth A Stuart, Eli Ben-Michael, Avi Feller, Alison Gemmill
{"title":"US Abortion Bans and Fertility.","authors":"Suzanne O Bell, Alexander M Franks, David Arbour, Selena Anjur-Dietrich, Elizabeth A Stuart, Eli Ben-Michael, Avi Feller, Alison Gemmill","doi":"10.1001/jama.2024.28527","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Abortion bans may lead to births among those who are unable to overcome barriers to abortion. The population-level effects of these policies, particularly their unequal impacts across subpopulations in the US, remain unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess heterogeneity in the association of abortion bans with changes in fertility in the US, within and across states.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>Drawing from birth certificate and US Census Bureau data from 2012 through 2023 for all 50 states and the District of Columbia, this study used a bayesian panel data model to evaluate state-by-subgroup-specific changes in fertility associated with complete or 6-week abortion bans in 14 US states. The average percent and absolute change in the fertility rate among females aged 15 through 44 years was estimated overall and by state, and within and across states by age, race and ethnicity, marital status, education, and insurance payer.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>Complete or 6-week abortion ban.</p><p><strong>Main outcome and measures: </strong>Fertility rate (births per 1000 reproductive-aged females) overall and by subgroups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were an estimated 1.01 (95% credible interval [CrI], 0.45-1.64) additional births above expectation per 1000 females aged 15 through 44 years (reproductive age) in states following adoption of abortion bans (60.55 observed vs 59.54 expected; 1.70% increase; 95% CrI, 0.75%-2.78%), equivalent to 22 180 excess births, with evidence of variation by state and subgroup. Estimated differences above expectation were largest for racially minoritized individuals (≈2.0%), unmarried individuals (1.79%), individuals younger than 35 years (≈2.0%), Medicaid beneficiaries (2.41%), and those without college degrees (high school diploma, 2.36%; some college, 1.58%), particularly in southern states. Differences in race and ethnicity and education across states explain most of the variability in the state-level association between abortion bans and fertility rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and relevance: </strong>These findings provide evidence that fertility rates in states with abortion bans were higher than would have been expected in the absence of these policies, with the largest estimated differences among subpopulations experiencing the greatest structural disadvantages and in states with among the worst maternal and child health and well-being outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":17196,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Association","volume":" ","pages":"1324-1332"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11826436/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2024.28527","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Abortion bans may lead to births among those who are unable to overcome barriers to abortion. The population-level effects of these policies, particularly their unequal impacts across subpopulations in the US, remain unclear.

Objective: To assess heterogeneity in the association of abortion bans with changes in fertility in the US, within and across states.

Design, setting, and participants: Drawing from birth certificate and US Census Bureau data from 2012 through 2023 for all 50 states and the District of Columbia, this study used a bayesian panel data model to evaluate state-by-subgroup-specific changes in fertility associated with complete or 6-week abortion bans in 14 US states. The average percent and absolute change in the fertility rate among females aged 15 through 44 years was estimated overall and by state, and within and across states by age, race and ethnicity, marital status, education, and insurance payer.

Exposure: Complete or 6-week abortion ban.

Main outcome and measures: Fertility rate (births per 1000 reproductive-aged females) overall and by subgroups.

Results: There were an estimated 1.01 (95% credible interval [CrI], 0.45-1.64) additional births above expectation per 1000 females aged 15 through 44 years (reproductive age) in states following adoption of abortion bans (60.55 observed vs 59.54 expected; 1.70% increase; 95% CrI, 0.75%-2.78%), equivalent to 22 180 excess births, with evidence of variation by state and subgroup. Estimated differences above expectation were largest for racially minoritized individuals (≈2.0%), unmarried individuals (1.79%), individuals younger than 35 years (≈2.0%), Medicaid beneficiaries (2.41%), and those without college degrees (high school diploma, 2.36%; some college, 1.58%), particularly in southern states. Differences in race and ethnicity and education across states explain most of the variability in the state-level association between abortion bans and fertility rates.

Conclusion and relevance: These findings provide evidence that fertility rates in states with abortion bans were higher than would have been expected in the absence of these policies, with the largest estimated differences among subpopulations experiencing the greatest structural disadvantages and in states with among the worst maternal and child health and well-being outcomes.

美国的堕胎禁令与生育率。
重要性:堕胎禁令可能导致那些无法克服堕胎障碍的人生育。这些政策对人口水平的影响,特别是它们对美国亚人口的不平等影响,仍不清楚。目的:评估美国州内和州间堕胎禁令与生育率变化关系的异质性。设计、环境和参与者:本研究利用2012年至2023年所有50个州和哥伦比亚特区的出生证明和美国人口普查局的数据,使用贝叶斯面板数据模型来评估美国14个州完全或6周堕胎禁令相关的各州亚组特定生育变化。15岁至44岁女性生育率的平均百分比和绝对变化是根据年龄、种族和民族、婚姻状况、教育程度和保险缴纳人等因素进行总体和各州、州内和州间的估计的。曝光:完全或6周的堕胎禁令。主要结果和措施:总体生育率(每1000名育龄妇女的出生率)和亚组生育率。结果:在采用堕胎禁令后的各州,每1000名15至44岁(育龄)女性中超过预期的额外出生率估计为1.01(95%可信区间[CrI], 0.45-1.64)(观察到60.55 vs预期59.54;增加1.70%;95% CrI, 0.75%-2.78%),相当于22 180个超额出生,有证据表明各州和亚组之间存在差异。高于预期的估计差异在少数种族个体(≈2.0%)、未婚个体(1.79%)、35岁以下个体(≈2.0%)、医疗补助受益人(2.41%)和没有大学学历的个体(高中文凭,2.36%;一些大学,1.58%),尤其是在南部各州。各州在种族、民族和教育方面的差异,解释了各州禁止堕胎与生育率之间关系的大部分差异。结论和相关性:这些调查结果提供的证据表明,禁止堕胎的州的生育率高于没有这些政策的情况下的预期,在经历最大结构性劣势的亚人口之间以及在孕产妇和儿童健康和福祉结果最差的州之间,估计差异最大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
45.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: JAMA, published continuously since 1883, is an international peer-reviewed general medical journal. JAMA is a member of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed, general medical and specialty publications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信