Use of deep learning-accelerated T2 TSE for prostate MRI: Comparison with and without hyoscine butylbromide admission

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
M. Boschheidgen , L. Drewes , B. Valentin , T. Ullrich , S. Trappe , R. Al-Monajjed , J.P. Radtke , P. Albers , H.J. Wittsack , G. Antoch , L. Schimmöller
{"title":"Use of deep learning-accelerated T2 TSE for prostate MRI: Comparison with and without hyoscine butylbromide admission","authors":"M. Boschheidgen ,&nbsp;L. Drewes ,&nbsp;B. Valentin ,&nbsp;T. Ullrich ,&nbsp;S. Trappe ,&nbsp;R. Al-Monajjed ,&nbsp;J.P. Radtke ,&nbsp;P. Albers ,&nbsp;H.J. Wittsack ,&nbsp;G. Antoch ,&nbsp;L. Schimmöller","doi":"10.1016/j.mri.2025.110358","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To investigate the use of deep learning (DL) T2-weighted turbo spin echo (TSE) imaging sequence with deep learning acceleration (T2DL) in prostate MRI regarding the necessity of hyoscine butylbromide (HBB) administration for high image quality.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>One hundred twenty consecutive patients divided into four groups (30 for each group) were included in this study. All patients received a T2DL (version 2022/23) and a conventional T2 TSE (cT2) sequence on an implemented 3 T scanner and software system. Group A received cT2 with HBB compared to T2DL without HBB with a field of view (FOV) of 130 mm and group B with a FOV of 160 mm. Group C received both sequences with a FOV of 160 mm plus HBB and group D without HBB. Two radiologists independently evaluated all imaging datasets in a blinded reading regarding motion, sharpness, noise, and diagnostic confidence. Furthermore, we analyzed quantitative parameters by calculating edge rise distance (ERD), signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise-ratio (CNR). Friedman test was used for group comparisons.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Baseline characteristics showed no significant differences between groups A-D. After HBB cT2 showed less motion artifacts, more sharpness, and a higher diagnostic confidence than T2DL, though DL sequences had significantly lower noise (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.01). Quantitative analysis revealed higher SNR and CNR for T2DL sequences (p &lt; 0.01), while edge rise distance (ERD) remained similar. Inter-reader agreement was good to excellent, with ICCs ranging from 0.84 to 0.93. T2DL acquisition time was significantly lower than for cT2.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In our study, cT2 sequences with HBB showed superior image quality and diagnostic confidence while the T2DL sequence offer promising potential for reducing MRI acquisition times and performed better in quantitative measures like SNR and CNR. Additional studies are required to evaluate further adjusted and developed DL applications for prostate MRI on upcoming scanner generations and to assess tumor detection rates.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18165,"journal":{"name":"Magnetic resonance imaging","volume":"118 ","pages":"Article 110358"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Magnetic resonance imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0730725X25000402","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To investigate the use of deep learning (DL) T2-weighted turbo spin echo (TSE) imaging sequence with deep learning acceleration (T2DL) in prostate MRI regarding the necessity of hyoscine butylbromide (HBB) administration for high image quality.

Methods

One hundred twenty consecutive patients divided into four groups (30 for each group) were included in this study. All patients received a T2DL (version 2022/23) and a conventional T2 TSE (cT2) sequence on an implemented 3 T scanner and software system. Group A received cT2 with HBB compared to T2DL without HBB with a field of view (FOV) of 130 mm and group B with a FOV of 160 mm. Group C received both sequences with a FOV of 160 mm plus HBB and group D without HBB. Two radiologists independently evaluated all imaging datasets in a blinded reading regarding motion, sharpness, noise, and diagnostic confidence. Furthermore, we analyzed quantitative parameters by calculating edge rise distance (ERD), signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise-ratio (CNR). Friedman test was used for group comparisons.

Results

Baseline characteristics showed no significant differences between groups A-D. After HBB cT2 showed less motion artifacts, more sharpness, and a higher diagnostic confidence than T2DL, though DL sequences had significantly lower noise (p < 0.01). Quantitative analysis revealed higher SNR and CNR for T2DL sequences (p < 0.01), while edge rise distance (ERD) remained similar. Inter-reader agreement was good to excellent, with ICCs ranging from 0.84 to 0.93. T2DL acquisition time was significantly lower than for cT2.

Conclusions

In our study, cT2 sequences with HBB showed superior image quality and diagnostic confidence while the T2DL sequence offer promising potential for reducing MRI acquisition times and performed better in quantitative measures like SNR and CNR. Additional studies are required to evaluate further adjusted and developed DL applications for prostate MRI on upcoming scanner generations and to assess tumor detection rates.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Magnetic resonance imaging
Magnetic resonance imaging 医学-核医学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
4.00%
发文量
194
审稿时长
83 days
期刊介绍: Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is the first international multidisciplinary journal encompassing physical, life, and clinical science investigations as they relate to the development and use of magnetic resonance imaging. MRI is dedicated to both basic research, technological innovation and applications, providing a single forum for communication among radiologists, physicists, chemists, biochemists, biologists, engineers, internists, pathologists, physiologists, computer scientists, and mathematicians.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信