Themes from Veterinary Student Evaluations of Teaching Before and After Final Exams: Classroom Climate, Achievement Striving, Goal Attainment, and Operational Deliverables.

IF 1.1 3区 农林科学 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Misty R Bailey, Dianne Mawby, India F Lane
{"title":"Themes from Veterinary Student Evaluations of Teaching Before and After Final Exams: Classroom Climate, Achievement Striving, Goal Attainment, and Operational Deliverables.","authors":"Misty R Bailey, Dianne Mawby, India F Lane","doi":"10.3138/jvme-2024-0063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Comments requested on student evaluation of teaching (SET) forms are intended to help instructors identify strengths and weaknesses in their teaching methods. However, low SET completion rates limit their usefulness. Standard practice in US higher education is that students complete SETs before their final examination period due to concerns about negative effects of the exam and grade. Toward increasing completion rates, we altered the standard availability window and examined how completion of SETs after final exams affected the themes and sentiment in comments. Students were randomly assigned to before finals and after finals groups. Comments were coded and qualitative data transformed into frequencies. Three themes emerged: <i>classroom climate</i>, <i>achievement striving and goal attainment</i>, and <i>operational deliverables</i>. Students focused most on how instructors promoted or detracted from their understanding and retention, clarity of assessments, and teaching aid effectivity. They also frequently noted their appreciation and perceptions of whether instructors enjoyed teaching. Students praised instructors' engagement as speakers and perceived dedication and effort. When students were critical, they focused most on grades, quantity of material, pace, and the curriculum. Before final exams, students commented more on the instructor's personality, clinical applicability of content, teaching aid effectivity, and pace; after final exams, they focused more on assessments. However, comments were largely commendable rather than critical, regardless of when SETs were completed. Contrasting some faculty perceptions that SETs are used to express anger, most students in this study expressed gratitude toward instructors for assisting them in achieving their goal of becoming a veterinarian.</p>","PeriodicalId":17575,"journal":{"name":"Journal of veterinary medical education","volume":" ","pages":"e20240063"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of veterinary medical education","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/jvme-2024-0063","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Comments requested on student evaluation of teaching (SET) forms are intended to help instructors identify strengths and weaknesses in their teaching methods. However, low SET completion rates limit their usefulness. Standard practice in US higher education is that students complete SETs before their final examination period due to concerns about negative effects of the exam and grade. Toward increasing completion rates, we altered the standard availability window and examined how completion of SETs after final exams affected the themes and sentiment in comments. Students were randomly assigned to before finals and after finals groups. Comments were coded and qualitative data transformed into frequencies. Three themes emerged: classroom climate, achievement striving and goal attainment, and operational deliverables. Students focused most on how instructors promoted or detracted from their understanding and retention, clarity of assessments, and teaching aid effectivity. They also frequently noted their appreciation and perceptions of whether instructors enjoyed teaching. Students praised instructors' engagement as speakers and perceived dedication and effort. When students were critical, they focused most on grades, quantity of material, pace, and the curriculum. Before final exams, students commented more on the instructor's personality, clinical applicability of content, teaching aid effectivity, and pace; after final exams, they focused more on assessments. However, comments were largely commendable rather than critical, regardless of when SETs were completed. Contrasting some faculty perceptions that SETs are used to express anger, most students in this study expressed gratitude toward instructors for assisting them in achieving their goal of becoming a veterinarian.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
30.00%
发文量
113
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Veterinary Medical Education (JVME) is the peer-reviewed scholarly journal of the Association of American Veterinary Medical Colleges (AAVMC). As an internationally distributed journal, JVME provides a forum for the exchange of ideas, research, and discoveries about veterinary medical education. This exchange benefits veterinary faculty, students, and the veterinary profession as a whole by preparing veterinarians to better perform their professional activities and to meet the needs of society. The journal’s areas of focus include best practices and educational methods in veterinary education; recruitment, training, and mentoring of students at all levels of education, including undergraduate, graduate, veterinary technology, and continuing education; clinical instruction and assessment; institutional policy; and other challenges and issues faced by veterinary educators domestically and internationally. Veterinary faculty of all countries are encouraged to participate as contributors, reviewers, and institutional representatives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信