Efficacy of local anaesthetic peri-femoral artery injection compared to subcutaneous infiltration in combination with femoral and sciatic nerve blocks for reducing thigh tourniquet-induced hypertension during lower-limb surgery under general anaesthesia: A randomised controlled double-blinded trial.
{"title":"Efficacy of local anaesthetic peri-femoral artery injection compared to subcutaneous infiltration in combination with femoral and sciatic nerve blocks for reducing thigh tourniquet-induced hypertension during lower-limb surgery under general anaesthesia: A randomised controlled double-blinded trial.","authors":"Chonruethai Tangkittithaworn, Wirinaree Kampitak, Tanawat Benjamungkalarak, Jirun Apinun","doi":"10.4103/ija.ija_968_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Tourniquet-induced hypertension (TH) remains an unresolved issue. Various techniques, such as peripheral nerve blocks, peri-femoral artery blocks, and subcutaneous infiltration, have been explored to address this. The primary objective was to compare the incidence of TH during lower-limb surgery under general anaesthesia between peri-femoral artery block and subcutaneous infiltration, combined with femoral and sciatic nerve blocks. Secondary objectives included intraoperative intravenous fentanyl and antihypertensive uses, as well as postoperative pain scores.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-centre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial involved 58 patients scheduled for elective lower-limb surgery. Participants were assigned to the peri-femoral artery block (P-FAB) or subcutaneous infiltration (SI) groups. All patients received general anaesthesia alongside femoral and sciatic nerve blocks. TH was defined as a 30% increase in systolic blood pressure from baseline. Pain was assessed using a numerical rating scale in the post-anaesthetic care unit and at 4, 8, 12, and 24 h post-surgery. Unpaired <i>t</i>-test, Chi-square, and Mann-Whitney U test were used for analysis. A <i>P</i> value less than 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences in the incidence of TH between the P-FAB and SI groups (<i>P</i> = 1.00). Similarly, no significant differences were observed in intraoperative fentanyl (<i>P</i> = 0.459) or antihypertensive use (<i>P</i> = 0.992). Pain scores across all measured aspects, including thigh and incision sites, were also not significantly different between groups (<i>P</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In lower-limb surgery, adding a peri-femoral artery block to general anaesthesia with femoral and sciatic nerve blocks did not reduce the incidence of TH compared to subcutaneous infiltration.</p>","PeriodicalId":13339,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia","volume":"68 12","pages":"1035-1042"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11812501/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ija.ija_968_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and aims: Tourniquet-induced hypertension (TH) remains an unresolved issue. Various techniques, such as peripheral nerve blocks, peri-femoral artery blocks, and subcutaneous infiltration, have been explored to address this. The primary objective was to compare the incidence of TH during lower-limb surgery under general anaesthesia between peri-femoral artery block and subcutaneous infiltration, combined with femoral and sciatic nerve blocks. Secondary objectives included intraoperative intravenous fentanyl and antihypertensive uses, as well as postoperative pain scores.
Methods: This single-centre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial involved 58 patients scheduled for elective lower-limb surgery. Participants were assigned to the peri-femoral artery block (P-FAB) or subcutaneous infiltration (SI) groups. All patients received general anaesthesia alongside femoral and sciatic nerve blocks. TH was defined as a 30% increase in systolic blood pressure from baseline. Pain was assessed using a numerical rating scale in the post-anaesthetic care unit and at 4, 8, 12, and 24 h post-surgery. Unpaired t-test, Chi-square, and Mann-Whitney U test were used for analysis. A P value less than 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
Results: There were no significant differences in the incidence of TH between the P-FAB and SI groups (P = 1.00). Similarly, no significant differences were observed in intraoperative fentanyl (P = 0.459) or antihypertensive use (P = 0.992). Pain scores across all measured aspects, including thigh and incision sites, were also not significantly different between groups (P > 0.05).
Conclusions: In lower-limb surgery, adding a peri-femoral artery block to general anaesthesia with femoral and sciatic nerve blocks did not reduce the incidence of TH compared to subcutaneous infiltration.