5-point airway (5-AIR) ultrasound protocol for confirmation of endotracheal intubation and position in paediatric patients undergoing surgery: A prospective observational study.

IF 2.9 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Indian Journal of Anaesthesia Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-03 DOI:10.4103/ija.ija_682_24
Adhiraj Baruah, Zainab Ahmad, Vaishali Waindeskar, Shikha Jain, Roshan Chanchlani, Pranita Mandal, Amit Agarwal, Shristi Agarwal
{"title":"5-point airway (5-AIR) ultrasound protocol for confirmation of endotracheal intubation and position in paediatric patients undergoing surgery: A prospective observational study.","authors":"Adhiraj Baruah, Zainab Ahmad, Vaishali Waindeskar, Shikha Jain, Roshan Chanchlani, Pranita Mandal, Amit Agarwal, Shristi Agarwal","doi":"10.4103/ija.ija_682_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>We devised and compared the accuracy and time required for a 5-point airway (5-AIR) ultrasound (USG) protocol for confirming endotracheal intubation (ETI) and endotracheal tube (ETT) positioning (ETP) with the current reference standard of quantitative waveform capnography (QWC) and auscultation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective observational study, 75 American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II children between 2 and 12 years undergoing elective surgery were recruited. ETI and ETP were confirmed clinically and sonographically using the 5-AIR USG protocol, which involves real-time tracheal USG followed by bilateral pleural and diaphragmatic ultrasonography.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no oesophageal intubation in this study; hence, the accuracy of the USG protocol for ETI could not be determined. For ETP, 68 patients had correctly placed ETTs. The 5-AIR USG protocol identified 4 out of 7 endobronchial placements, resulting in a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 57.14%, and an overall diagnostic accuracy of 96%. The mean time for confirmation of ETI by QWC (20.77 s (standard deviation (SD): 4.11 s; 95% confidence interval (CI): 19.84, 21.70) was longer than real-time tracheal USG (2.11 s (SD: 0.31 s; 95% CI: 2.04, 2.18) (<i>P</i> = 0.001). For ETP, the mean time for 5-point auscultation was 12.69 s (SD: 2.48 s; 95% CI: 12.19, 13.25) versus 6.39 s (SD: 0.54 s; 95% CI: 6.27, 6.51) for pleural USG (<i>P</i> = 0.001). Adding diaphragmatic scanning increased the mean time to 11.45 s (SD: 0.87 s; 95% CI: 11.25, 11.65) and 30.68 s (SD: 2.01 s; 95% CI: 30.22, 31.13) if a probe change was required (<i>P</i> = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The 5-AIR USG protocol was useful, fast, and demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy to confirm endotracheal intubation and position in paediatric patients. This protocol may be incorporated along with clinical signs, auscultation, and QWC to confirm endotracheal intubation and position.</p>","PeriodicalId":13339,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia","volume":"68 12","pages":"1068-1074"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11812502/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ija.ija_682_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: We devised and compared the accuracy and time required for a 5-point airway (5-AIR) ultrasound (USG) protocol for confirming endotracheal intubation (ETI) and endotracheal tube (ETT) positioning (ETP) with the current reference standard of quantitative waveform capnography (QWC) and auscultation.

Methods: In this prospective observational study, 75 American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II children between 2 and 12 years undergoing elective surgery were recruited. ETI and ETP were confirmed clinically and sonographically using the 5-AIR USG protocol, which involves real-time tracheal USG followed by bilateral pleural and diaphragmatic ultrasonography.

Results: There was no oesophageal intubation in this study; hence, the accuracy of the USG protocol for ETI could not be determined. For ETP, 68 patients had correctly placed ETTs. The 5-AIR USG protocol identified 4 out of 7 endobronchial placements, resulting in a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 57.14%, and an overall diagnostic accuracy of 96%. The mean time for confirmation of ETI by QWC (20.77 s (standard deviation (SD): 4.11 s; 95% confidence interval (CI): 19.84, 21.70) was longer than real-time tracheal USG (2.11 s (SD: 0.31 s; 95% CI: 2.04, 2.18) (P = 0.001). For ETP, the mean time for 5-point auscultation was 12.69 s (SD: 2.48 s; 95% CI: 12.19, 13.25) versus 6.39 s (SD: 0.54 s; 95% CI: 6.27, 6.51) for pleural USG (P = 0.001). Adding diaphragmatic scanning increased the mean time to 11.45 s (SD: 0.87 s; 95% CI: 11.25, 11.65) and 30.68 s (SD: 2.01 s; 95% CI: 30.22, 31.13) if a probe change was required (P = 0.001).

Conclusion: The 5-AIR USG protocol was useful, fast, and demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy to confirm endotracheal intubation and position in paediatric patients. This protocol may be incorporated along with clinical signs, auscultation, and QWC to confirm endotracheal intubation and position.

5点气道(5-AIR)超声方案用于确认小儿手术患者气管插管和体位:一项前瞻性观察研究。
背景与目的:我们设计并比较了5点气道(5-AIR)超声(USG)确认气管插管(ETI)和气管插管(ETT)定位(ETP)的准确性和所需时间,与目前定量波形插管(QWC)和听诊的参考标准。方法:在这项前瞻性观察研究中,招募了75名2至12岁接受择期手术的美国麻醉医师协会身体状况I或II的儿童。ETI和ETP采用5-AIR USG方案进行临床和超声确认,其中包括实时气管USG,然后进行双侧胸膜和膈超声检查。结果:本组无食管插管;因此,无法确定美国地质调查局ETI协议的准确性。对于ETP, 68例患者正确放置了ETP。5-AIR USG方案确定了7个支气管内放置中的4个,敏感性为100%,特异性为57.14%,总体诊断准确性为96%。QWC确认ETI的平均时间为20.77 s(标准差:4.11 s;95%可信区间(CI): 19.84, 21.70)比实时气管USG (2.11 s (SD: 0.31 s;95% ci: 2.04, 2.18) (p = 0.001)。ETP的5点听诊时间平均为12.69 s (SD: 2.48 s;95% CI: 12.19, 13.25) vs . 6.39 s (SD: 0.54 s;胸膜USG的95% CI: 6.27, 6.51) (P = 0.001)。增加横膈膜扫描使平均时间增加到11.45 s (SD: 0.87 s;95% CI: 11.25, 11.65)和30.68 s (SD: 2.01 s;95% CI: 30.22, 31.13),如果需要改变探针(P = 0.001)。结论:5-AIR USG方案对儿科患者气管插管及体位的诊断具有实用性、快速性和较高的诊断准确性。该方案可与临床体征、听诊和QWC结合使用,以确认气管插管和位置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
44.80%
发文量
210
审稿时长
36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信