Assessment of Pharmacovigilance Across University Hospitals in Morocco.

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Drug Safety Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1007/s40264-025-01517-w
Hind Hamzaoui, Anna Shaum, Imad Cherkaoui, Latifa Ait Moussa, Houda Sefiani, Ismail Talibi, Ghita Benabdallah, Omar Salman, Seth Ferrey, Rachida Soulaymani Bencheikh
{"title":"Assessment of Pharmacovigilance Across University Hospitals in Morocco.","authors":"Hind Hamzaoui, Anna Shaum, Imad Cherkaoui, Latifa Ait Moussa, Houda Sefiani, Ismail Talibi, Ghita Benabdallah, Omar Salman, Seth Ferrey, Rachida Soulaymani Bencheikh","doi":"10.1007/s40264-025-01517-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Despite the increased scrutiny on vaccine safety following the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, Morocco's Centre of Antipoison and Pharmacovigilance (CAPM) remained concerned that the pharmacovigilance system in Morocco was insufficiently implemented, including limited adverse event (AE) reporting, poor data use, and inconsistent training nationwide.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We sought to assess the status of pharmacovigilance activities (PAs) prior to formally institutionalizing them across university hospital centers (UHCs), given their position as the main providers of healthcare in Morocco and key sources for reporting serious AEs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We assessed seven UHCs (housing 30 hospitals) in 2023 using a structured questionnaire with pharmacovigilance focal points developed from the World Health Organization's indicators of pharmacovigilance and the Global Benchmarking Tool. Data were grouped into 28 PAs and scored from 0 (not implemented) to 3 (fully implemented). We then calculated an implementation rate for each site on the basis of percent of PAs fully implemented (≥ 70%, well established; > 40% to < 70%, partially implemented; and ≤ 40%, not implemented). A desk review was also performed at the sites. Using the results of the assessment, three working groups of pharmacovigilance stakeholders developed recommendations to be formally adopted by UHCs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Basic elements of pharmacovigilance (notification forms and VigiFlow<sup>®</sup> or Excel databases) were present at all the UHCs assessed. In total, 14 hospitals (47%) had well-established PAs, including advanced activities such as signal detection of adverse events following the use of medicines and vaccines, as well as causality assessment; 9 hospitals (30%) were partially implementing pharmacovigilance, and 7 hospitals (23%) had no established activities or very basic activities. Within four UHCs, activities had not been implemented at the same level from one hospital to another and vaccine vigilance was largely deprioritized. The working groups made recommendations for improving collaboration, standardizing procedures, and outlining a new organizational structure for pharmacovigilance, which was institutionalized by a formal agreement among UHCs in July 2023.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The assessment revealed a subgroup of centers with well-established AE signal detection and causality assessment abilities, which could play a leading role in the country. After the site assessment, our collaborative approach of bringing together focal points to identify next steps and generate buy-in helped to formalize pharmacovigilance across centers.</p>","PeriodicalId":11382,"journal":{"name":"Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"527-539"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11981840/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40264-025-01517-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Despite the increased scrutiny on vaccine safety following the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, Morocco's Centre of Antipoison and Pharmacovigilance (CAPM) remained concerned that the pharmacovigilance system in Morocco was insufficiently implemented, including limited adverse event (AE) reporting, poor data use, and inconsistent training nationwide.

Objectives: We sought to assess the status of pharmacovigilance activities (PAs) prior to formally institutionalizing them across university hospital centers (UHCs), given their position as the main providers of healthcare in Morocco and key sources for reporting serious AEs.

Methods: We assessed seven UHCs (housing 30 hospitals) in 2023 using a structured questionnaire with pharmacovigilance focal points developed from the World Health Organization's indicators of pharmacovigilance and the Global Benchmarking Tool. Data were grouped into 28 PAs and scored from 0 (not implemented) to 3 (fully implemented). We then calculated an implementation rate for each site on the basis of percent of PAs fully implemented (≥ 70%, well established; > 40% to < 70%, partially implemented; and ≤ 40%, not implemented). A desk review was also performed at the sites. Using the results of the assessment, three working groups of pharmacovigilance stakeholders developed recommendations to be formally adopted by UHCs.

Results: Basic elements of pharmacovigilance (notification forms and VigiFlow® or Excel databases) were present at all the UHCs assessed. In total, 14 hospitals (47%) had well-established PAs, including advanced activities such as signal detection of adverse events following the use of medicines and vaccines, as well as causality assessment; 9 hospitals (30%) were partially implementing pharmacovigilance, and 7 hospitals (23%) had no established activities or very basic activities. Within four UHCs, activities had not been implemented at the same level from one hospital to another and vaccine vigilance was largely deprioritized. The working groups made recommendations for improving collaboration, standardizing procedures, and outlining a new organizational structure for pharmacovigilance, which was institutionalized by a formal agreement among UHCs in July 2023.

Conclusions: The assessment revealed a subgroup of centers with well-established AE signal detection and causality assessment abilities, which could play a leading role in the country. After the site assessment, our collaborative approach of bringing together focal points to identify next steps and generate buy-in helped to formalize pharmacovigilance across centers.

摩洛哥大学医院药物警戒评估
导言:尽管在2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行之后加强了对疫苗安全性的审查,但摩洛哥抗毒和药物警戒中心(CAPM)仍然担心摩洛哥的药物警戒系统实施不足,包括不良事件(AE)报告有限、数据使用不良以及全国培训不一致。目的:考虑到大学医院中心(uhc)作为摩洛哥主要的医疗服务提供者和严重ae报告的主要来源,我们试图在将其正式制度化之前评估药物警戒活动(PAs)的状况。方法:我们在2023年对7家uhc(拥有30家医院)进行了评估,使用了一份结构化问卷,其中包括根据世界卫生组织药物警戒指标和全球基准工具制定的药物警戒联络点。数据分为28个pa,评分从0(未实施)到3(完全实施)。然后,我们根据pa完全实施的百分比计算每个站点的执行率(≥70%,建立良好;> 40% ~ < 70%,部分实施;≤40%,未实施)。还在这些地点进行了案头审查。根据评估结果,三个药物警戒利益攸关方工作组制定了供保健中心正式采用的建议。结果:所有被评估的保健中心均具备药物警戒的基本要素(通报表格和VigiFlow®或Excel数据库)。总共有14家医院(47%)建立了完善的PAs,包括先进的活动,如使用药物和疫苗后不良事件的信号检测,以及因果关系评估;9家医院(30%)部分实施了药物警戒,7家医院(23%)没有建立或非常基本的活动。在四个保健中心内,各医院在同一级别上没有开展活动,疫苗警戒在很大程度上不受重视。工作组就改善协作、使程序标准化和概述药物警戒的新组织结构提出了建议,并于2023年7月通过全民健康覆盖中心之间的正式协议将其制度化。结论:该评价揭示了一个具有完善的声发射信号检测和因果关系评估能力的中心亚群,可在全国发挥主导作用。在现场评估之后,我们的协作方法将各焦点聚集在一起确定下一步措施并产生支持,这有助于使各中心的药物警戒正规化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Drug Safety
Drug Safety 医学-毒理学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
112
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Drug Safety is the official journal of the International Society of Pharmacovigilance. The journal includes: Overviews of contentious or emerging issues. Comprehensive narrative reviews that provide an authoritative source of information on epidemiology, clinical features, prevention and management of adverse effects of individual drugs and drug classes. In-depth benefit-risk assessment of adverse effect and efficacy data for a drug in a defined therapeutic area. Systematic reviews (with or without meta-analyses) that collate empirical evidence to answer a specific research question, using explicit, systematic methods as outlined by the PRISMA statement. Original research articles reporting the results of well-designed studies in disciplines such as pharmacoepidemiology, pharmacovigilance, pharmacology and toxicology, and pharmacogenomics. Editorials and commentaries on topical issues. Additional digital features (including animated abstracts, video abstracts, slide decks, audio slides, instructional videos, infographics, podcasts and animations) can be published with articles; these are designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. In addition, articles published in Drug Safety Drugs may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist readers who have some knowledge of, but not in-depth expertise in, the area to understand important medical advances.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信