Dose-Dependent Relationship Between Long-Term Metformin Use and the Risk of Diabetic Retinopathy: A Population-Based Cohort Study.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Clinical Drug Investigation Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1007/s40261-025-01421-2
Yu-Ching Li, Kuang-Hua Huang, Yih Yang, Shuo-Yan Gau, Tung-Han Tsai, Chien-Ying Lee
{"title":"Dose-Dependent Relationship Between Long-Term Metformin Use and the Risk of Diabetic Retinopathy: A Population-Based Cohort Study.","authors":"Yu-Ching Li, Kuang-Hua Huang, Yih Yang, Shuo-Yan Gau, Tung-Han Tsai, Chien-Ying Lee","doi":"10.1007/s40261-025-01421-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Recent research has raised concerns about the association between metformin treatment in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) and an increased risk of diabetic retinopathy. We sought to investigate this relationship, specifically examining if metformin use affects diabetic retinopathy risk in a dose-dependent manner.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was a secondary data analysis based on a nationwide population database in Taiwan. Patients with new-onset DM, an age of 20 years or older, and a diagnosis of type 2 DM received at any time during 2002-2013 were included in the study. Patients diagnosed with new-onset type 2 DM between 2002 and 2013 were enrolled as the study population. We divided them into two groups: those treated with metformin and those treated with sulfonylureas. A Cox proportional hazards model was employed to estimate the risk of diabetic retinopathy after 5 years of follow-up, including cumulative defined daily dose and intensity of metformin treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 241,231 patients received treatment with metformin, while 152,617 patients were treated with sulfonylureas. Compared with patients treated with sulfonylureas, patients who received metformin treatment, at a cumulative defined daily dose < 30, had a lower risk of diabetic retinopathy (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.77; 95% confidence interval 0.60-0.98). However, those with varying defined daily doses, especially at a higher metformin treatment level (> 25 defined daily dose), had a 2.43 times higher risk of diabetic retinopathy (95% confidence interval 1.37-4.30) compared with patients treated with sulfonylureas.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with DM treated with a lower cumulative dosage of metformin showed beneficial effects that were associated with a lower risk of diabetic retinopathy. In contrast, a higher intensity of metformin use had a greater risk of diabetic retinopathy.</p>","PeriodicalId":10402,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Drug Investigation","volume":" ","pages":"125-136"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11876261/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Drug Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40261-025-01421-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: Recent research has raised concerns about the association between metformin treatment in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) and an increased risk of diabetic retinopathy. We sought to investigate this relationship, specifically examining if metformin use affects diabetic retinopathy risk in a dose-dependent manner.

Methods: This study was a secondary data analysis based on a nationwide population database in Taiwan. Patients with new-onset DM, an age of 20 years or older, and a diagnosis of type 2 DM received at any time during 2002-2013 were included in the study. Patients diagnosed with new-onset type 2 DM between 2002 and 2013 were enrolled as the study population. We divided them into two groups: those treated with metformin and those treated with sulfonylureas. A Cox proportional hazards model was employed to estimate the risk of diabetic retinopathy after 5 years of follow-up, including cumulative defined daily dose and intensity of metformin treatment.

Results: A total of 241,231 patients received treatment with metformin, while 152,617 patients were treated with sulfonylureas. Compared with patients treated with sulfonylureas, patients who received metformin treatment, at a cumulative defined daily dose < 30, had a lower risk of diabetic retinopathy (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.77; 95% confidence interval 0.60-0.98). However, those with varying defined daily doses, especially at a higher metformin treatment level (> 25 defined daily dose), had a 2.43 times higher risk of diabetic retinopathy (95% confidence interval 1.37-4.30) compared with patients treated with sulfonylureas.

Conclusions: Patients with DM treated with a lower cumulative dosage of metformin showed beneficial effects that were associated with a lower risk of diabetic retinopathy. In contrast, a higher intensity of metformin use had a greater risk of diabetic retinopathy.

长期使用二甲双胍与糖尿病视网膜病变风险之间的剂量依赖关系:一项基于人群的队列研究
背景和目的:最近的研究引起了人们对二甲双胍治疗糖尿病(DM)患者与糖尿病视网膜病变风险增加之间关系的关注。我们试图调查这种关系,特别是检查二甲双胍的使用是否以剂量依赖的方式影响糖尿病视网膜病变的风险。方法:本研究以全国人口资料库为资料来源,进行二次资料分析。新发糖尿病患者,年龄在20岁或以上,并在2002-2013年期间任何时间接受2型糖尿病诊断纳入研究。2002年至2013年间诊断为新发2型糖尿病的患者被纳入研究人群。我们将他们分为两组:二甲双胍组和磺脲类组。采用Cox比例风险模型估计随访5年后糖尿病视网膜病变的风险,包括二甲双胍治疗的累积定义日剂量和强度。结果:二甲双胍治疗241231例,磺脲类治疗152617例。与接受磺脲类药物治疗的患者相比,接受二甲双胍治疗的患者(每日累积剂量为25个)发生糖尿病视网膜病变的风险是接受磺脲类药物治疗的患者的2.43倍(95%可信区间为1.37-4.30)。结论:使用较低累积剂量二甲双胍治疗的糖尿病患者显示出与较低的糖尿病视网膜病变风险相关的有益效果。相反,二甲双胍使用强度越高,患糖尿病视网膜病变的风险越大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.10%
发文量
108
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Drug Investigation provides rapid publication of original research covering all phases of clinical drug development and therapeutic use of drugs. The Journal includes: -Clinical trials, outcomes research, clinical pharmacoeconomic studies and pharmacoepidemiology studies with a strong link to optimum prescribing practice for a drug or group of drugs. -Clinical pharmacodynamic and clinical pharmacokinetic studies with a strong link to clinical practice. -Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic studies in healthy volunteers in which significant implications for clinical prescribing are discussed. -Studies focusing on the application of drug delivery technology in healthcare. -Short communications and case study reports that meet the above criteria will also be considered. Additional digital features (including animated abstracts, video abstracts, slide decks, audio slides, instructional videos, infographics, podcasts and animations) can be published with articles; these are designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. In addition, articles published in Clinical Drug Investigation may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist readers who have some knowledge, but non in-depth expertise in, the area to understand important medical advances.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信