Improving the efficiency of sevoflurane delivery during general anaesthesia by educating and motivating anaesthetists to utilise the Volatile Efficiency Ratio.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Samuel T Costello, Blake J Vorias, Roman Kluger
{"title":"Improving the efficiency of sevoflurane delivery during general anaesthesia by educating and motivating anaesthetists to utilise the Volatile Efficiency Ratio.","authors":"Samuel T Costello, Blake J Vorias, Roman Kluger","doi":"10.1177/0310057X241296574","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Volatile anaesthetic agents such as sevoflurane contribute to greenhouse gas emissions, and selecting low fresh gas flows on anaesthetic machines minimises their waste. Facilitating improvements in sevoflurane use requires the education, motivation, and standardised evaluation of anaesthetists. There is currently no standard of practice related to the efficiency of anaesthetic gas delivery per case. We conducted a multi-component study termed 'Low With The Flow' (LWTF) to directly address these requirements by educating and motivating anaesthetists to reduce fresh gas flow and thereby sevoflurane use. We introduced a novel metric, the 'volatile efficiency ratio' (VER), able to be calculated on Draeger Primus™, the Draeger Atlan™ family and Draeger Perseus A500™ machines, to audit sevoflurane use in a case-by-case fashion, and assess whether the intervention could achieve a set VER target. The LWTF intervention significantly improved the efficiency of sevoflurane delivery (VER 0.46 pre-intervention (<i>n</i> = 518) versus VER 0.57 post-intervention (<i>n</i> = 531), 95% confidence interval 0.092 to 0.129, <i>P < </i>0.0001) resulting in a calculated average of 1.3 kg carbon dioxide equivalent emissions reduction and approximately AUD 3.50 saving per case. Consequently, the financial and environmental outcomes from sevoflurane delivery were considerably reduced. Our LWTF intervention provides a valuable model for other anaesthetic departments to investigate and address the global environmental and financial burdens related to their volatile anaesthetic use. For anaesthetists using anaesthesia machines that do not facilitate calculation of VER, an approach using components of our LWTF intervention may still reduce the environmental and financial impacts associated with administration of volatile anaesthesia.</p>","PeriodicalId":7746,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia and Intensive Care","volume":" ","pages":"310057X241296574"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesia and Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0310057X241296574","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Volatile anaesthetic agents such as sevoflurane contribute to greenhouse gas emissions, and selecting low fresh gas flows on anaesthetic machines minimises their waste. Facilitating improvements in sevoflurane use requires the education, motivation, and standardised evaluation of anaesthetists. There is currently no standard of practice related to the efficiency of anaesthetic gas delivery per case. We conducted a multi-component study termed 'Low With The Flow' (LWTF) to directly address these requirements by educating and motivating anaesthetists to reduce fresh gas flow and thereby sevoflurane use. We introduced a novel metric, the 'volatile efficiency ratio' (VER), able to be calculated on Draeger Primus™, the Draeger Atlan™ family and Draeger Perseus A500™ machines, to audit sevoflurane use in a case-by-case fashion, and assess whether the intervention could achieve a set VER target. The LWTF intervention significantly improved the efficiency of sevoflurane delivery (VER 0.46 pre-intervention (n = 518) versus VER 0.57 post-intervention (n = 531), 95% confidence interval 0.092 to 0.129, P < 0.0001) resulting in a calculated average of 1.3 kg carbon dioxide equivalent emissions reduction and approximately AUD 3.50 saving per case. Consequently, the financial and environmental outcomes from sevoflurane delivery were considerably reduced. Our LWTF intervention provides a valuable model for other anaesthetic departments to investigate and address the global environmental and financial burdens related to their volatile anaesthetic use. For anaesthetists using anaesthesia machines that do not facilitate calculation of VER, an approach using components of our LWTF intervention may still reduce the environmental and financial impacts associated with administration of volatile anaesthesia.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
150
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Anaesthesia and Intensive Care is an international journal publishing timely, peer reviewed articles that have educational value and scientific merit for clinicians and researchers associated with anaesthesia, intensive care medicine, and pain medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信