The Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Selective Nerve Block in the Endovascular Treatment of Arteriovenous Fistulas.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 HEMATOLOGY
Jing Wen, Shen Zhan, Yuzhu Wang, Lihong Zhang, Han Li
{"title":"The Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Selective Nerve Block in the Endovascular Treatment of Arteriovenous Fistulas.","authors":"Jing Wen, Shen Zhan, Yuzhu Wang, Lihong Zhang, Han Li","doi":"10.1159/000543827","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Delivering requisite anesthesia for endovascular treatment of dysfunctional arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) under a targeted nerve block can achieve reasonable analgesia. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided selective nerve block (SNB) during percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) of dysfunctional arteriovenous access.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two hundred forty-six patients with dysfunctional radiocephalic AVF undergoing PTA were enrolled in this prospective, randomized controlled trial at the Department of Nephrology, Haidian Hospital, Peking University Third Hospital from June 1, 2022, to August 31, 2023. The patients were randomized into either the SNB group (SNB group, n = 123) or the local infiltration anesthesia group (LA group, n = 123). A visual analog scale (VAS) from no pain (= 0) to worst pain possible (= 10) was used to assess the pain intensity. Patient and operator satisfaction were graded from 0 to 2: 0, not satisfied at all; 1, partially satisfied; 2, satisfied. The AVF patency at 1 and 3 months after PTA was also evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with the LA group, the SNB group had significantly lower VAS scores (Z = -7.193, p < 0.001) and required fewer additional anesthetics during the operation (χ2 = -4.847, p = 0.028). Patient and operator satisfaction were significantly higher in the SNB group (p < 0.05). Eight patients in the SNB group encountered grade 3 motor paralysis after the operation, and they all recovered within 60 min. There was no significant difference in primary patency rates of the fistula between the two groups either at 1 month or 3 months after the operation (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared with LA, ultrasound-guided SNB has advantages over the LA during endovascular treatment of dysfunctional hemodialysis (HD) fistulas. It can provide safe and efficient analgesia with excellent procedural satisfaction in HD patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":8953,"journal":{"name":"Blood Purification","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood Purification","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000543827","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Delivering requisite anesthesia for endovascular treatment of dysfunctional arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) under a targeted nerve block can achieve reasonable analgesia. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided selective nerve block (SNB) during percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) of dysfunctional arteriovenous access.

Methods: Two hundred forty-six patients with dysfunctional radiocephalic AVF undergoing PTA were enrolled in this prospective, randomized controlled trial at the Department of Nephrology, Haidian Hospital, Peking University Third Hospital from June 1, 2022, to August 31, 2023. The patients were randomized into either the SNB group (SNB group, n = 123) or the local infiltration anesthesia group (LA group, n = 123). A visual analog scale (VAS) from no pain (= 0) to worst pain possible (= 10) was used to assess the pain intensity. Patient and operator satisfaction were graded from 0 to 2: 0, not satisfied at all; 1, partially satisfied; 2, satisfied. The AVF patency at 1 and 3 months after PTA was also evaluated.

Results: Compared with the LA group, the SNB group had significantly lower VAS scores (Z = -7.193, p < 0.001) and required fewer additional anesthetics during the operation (χ2 = -4.847, p = 0.028). Patient and operator satisfaction were significantly higher in the SNB group (p < 0.05). Eight patients in the SNB group encountered grade 3 motor paralysis after the operation, and they all recovered within 60 min. There was no significant difference in primary patency rates of the fistula between the two groups either at 1 month or 3 months after the operation (p > 0.05).

Conclusion: Compared with LA, ultrasound-guided SNB has advantages over the LA during endovascular treatment of dysfunctional hemodialysis (HD) fistulas. It can provide safe and efficient analgesia with excellent procedural satisfaction in HD patients.

超声引导下选择性神经阻滞在血管内治疗动静脉瘘中的疗效观察。
对功能失调性动静脉瘘(AVFs)在靶向神经阻滞下给予必要的麻醉可以达到合理的镇痛效果。我们评估了超声引导下选择性神经阻滞在经皮腔内血管成形术(PTA)中治疗功能障碍动静脉通路的有效性和安全性。方法于2022年6月1日至2023年8月31日在北京大学第三医院海淀医院肾内科接受PTA治疗的功能不全放射性头动静脉瘘患者246例进行前瞻性、随机对照试验。将患者随机分为选择性神经阻滞组(SNB组,n=123)和局麻组(LA组,n=123)。采用视觉模拟评分(VAS)从无疼痛(= 0)到最严重疼痛(= 10)来评估疼痛强度。患者和操作者满意度从0到2.0分,表示不满意;1、部分满意;2、满足。同时对PTA术后1个月和3个月动静脉瘘通畅情况进行评价。结果与局麻组比较,选择性神经阻滞组VAS评分明显低于局麻组(Z = -7.193, p < 0.001),术中所需附加麻醉剂较少(²= -4.847,p = 0.028)。选择性神经阻滞组患者和操作者满意度均显著高于选择性神经阻滞组(p < 0.05)。选择性神经阻滞组8例术后出现3级运动麻痹,均在60分钟内恢复。两组术后1个月和3个月瘘管初通率比较,差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。结论超声引导下选择性神经阻滞治疗功能失调性血液透析瘘优于局部麻醉。可为血液透析患者提供安全、有效的镇痛和良好的手术满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Blood Purification
Blood Purification 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
3.30%
发文量
69
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Practical information on hemodialysis, hemofiltration, peritoneal dialysis and apheresis is featured in this journal. Recognizing the critical importance of equipment and procedures, particular emphasis has been placed on reports, drawn from a wide range of fields, describing technical advances and improvements in methodology. Papers reflect the search for cost-effective solutions which increase not only patient survival but also patient comfort and disease improvement through prevention or correction of undesirable effects. Advances in vascular access and blood anticoagulation, problems associated with exposure of blood to foreign surfaces and acute-care nephrology, including continuous therapies, also receive attention. Nephrologists, internists, intensivists and hospital staff involved in dialysis, apheresis and immunoadsorption for acute and chronic solid organ failure will find this journal useful and informative. ''Blood Purification'' also serves as a platform for multidisciplinary experiences involving nephrologists, cardiologists and critical care physicians in order to expand the level of interaction between different disciplines and specialities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信