Gut Microbiota Predicts Treatment Response to Empagliflozin Among MASLD Patients Without Diabetes Mellitus

IF 6 2区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Ho Yu Ng, Lina Zhang, Jing Tong Tan, Rex Wan Hin Hui, Man Fung Yuen, Wai Kay Seto, Wai K. Leung, Ka Shing Cheung
{"title":"Gut Microbiota Predicts Treatment Response to Empagliflozin Among MASLD Patients Without Diabetes Mellitus","authors":"Ho Yu Ng,&nbsp;Lina Zhang,&nbsp;Jing Tong Tan,&nbsp;Rex Wan Hin Hui,&nbsp;Man Fung Yuen,&nbsp;Wai Kay Seto,&nbsp;Wai K. Leung,&nbsp;Ka Shing Cheung","doi":"10.1111/liv.70023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Aim</h3>\n \n <p>We aimed to investigate whether gut microbiota could predict the treatment response to pharmacological agents among metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) patients without diabetes mellitus (DM), as data are lacking.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We prospectively followed up non-diabetic MASLD patients who used empagliflozin. Clinical, anthropometric, laboratory assessments and magnetic resonance imaging-proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) were performed from baseline to week 52 (EOT). Baseline stool samples were collected, and shotgun DNA metagenomic sequencing was performed to profile microbiome. The primary outcome was treatment response to empagliflozin at EOT, defined as MRI-PDFF decline ≥ 30% at EOT from baseline. Linear discriminant analysis [LDA] effect size was used to identify putative bacterial species. Multivariable logistic regression was used to derive adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of outcome with bacterial species by adjusting for clinical factors.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Twenty-two (48.9%) of 45 patients (median age: 56.9 years [IQR: 51.0–63.2]; male: 23 [51.1%]) achieved treatment response at EOT. There was difference in alpha diversity (Shannon index: <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001; Simpson index: <i>p</i> = 0.001) and beta diversity (<i>p</i> = 0.048) in baseline microbiome between treatment response and non-response groups. <i>Faecalibacterium prausnitzii</i> (log<sub>10</sub>LDAscore = 4.27), <i>Lachnospira pectinoschiza</i> (log<sub>10</sub>LDAscore = 3.99), <i>Anaerostipes hadrus</i> (log<sub>10</sub>LDAscore = 3.98), <i>Roseburia faecis</i> (log<sub>10</sub>LDAscore = 3.97), <i>Roseburia inulinivorans</i> (log<sub>10</sub>LDAscore = 3.58) and <i>Agathobaculum butyriciproducens</i> (log<sub>10</sub>LDAscore = 2.77) were enriched in the treatment response group. <i>L. pectinoschiza</i> (aOR: 34.1; <i>p</i> = 0.015), <i>A. hadrus</i> (aOR:35.0; <i>p</i> = 0.032) and <i>A. butyriciproducens</i> (aOR:22.3; <i>p</i> = 0.023) independently predicted treatment response but not clinical factors. These three species collectively predicted treatment response with AUROC of 0.89 (95% CI: 0.80–0.99).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Certain gut bacterial species, particularly the combination of <i>A. hadrus</i>, <i>L. pectinoschiza</i> and <i>A. butyriciproducens,</i> may predict treatment response to empagliflozin in MAFLD patients without DM.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18101,"journal":{"name":"Liver International","volume":"45 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/liv.70023","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Liver International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/liv.70023","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aim

We aimed to investigate whether gut microbiota could predict the treatment response to pharmacological agents among metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) patients without diabetes mellitus (DM), as data are lacking.

Methods

We prospectively followed up non-diabetic MASLD patients who used empagliflozin. Clinical, anthropometric, laboratory assessments and magnetic resonance imaging-proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) were performed from baseline to week 52 (EOT). Baseline stool samples were collected, and shotgun DNA metagenomic sequencing was performed to profile microbiome. The primary outcome was treatment response to empagliflozin at EOT, defined as MRI-PDFF decline ≥ 30% at EOT from baseline. Linear discriminant analysis [LDA] effect size was used to identify putative bacterial species. Multivariable logistic regression was used to derive adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of outcome with bacterial species by adjusting for clinical factors.

Results

Twenty-two (48.9%) of 45 patients (median age: 56.9 years [IQR: 51.0–63.2]; male: 23 [51.1%]) achieved treatment response at EOT. There was difference in alpha diversity (Shannon index: p < 0.001; Simpson index: p = 0.001) and beta diversity (p = 0.048) in baseline microbiome between treatment response and non-response groups. Faecalibacterium prausnitzii (log10LDAscore = 4.27), Lachnospira pectinoschiza (log10LDAscore = 3.99), Anaerostipes hadrus (log10LDAscore = 3.98), Roseburia faecis (log10LDAscore = 3.97), Roseburia inulinivorans (log10LDAscore = 3.58) and Agathobaculum butyriciproducens (log10LDAscore = 2.77) were enriched in the treatment response group. L. pectinoschiza (aOR: 34.1; p = 0.015), A. hadrus (aOR:35.0; p = 0.032) and A. butyriciproducens (aOR:22.3; p = 0.023) independently predicted treatment response but not clinical factors. These three species collectively predicted treatment response with AUROC of 0.89 (95% CI: 0.80–0.99).

Conclusions

Certain gut bacterial species, particularly the combination of A. hadrus, L. pectinoschiza and A. butyriciproducens, may predict treatment response to empagliflozin in MAFLD patients without DM.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Liver International
Liver International 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
13.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
348
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Liver International promotes all aspects of the science of hepatology from basic research to applied clinical studies. Providing an international forum for the publication of high-quality original research in hepatology, it is an essential resource for everyone working on normal and abnormal structure and function in the liver and its constituent cells, including clinicians and basic scientists involved in the multi-disciplinary field of hepatology. The journal welcomes articles from all fields of hepatology, which may be published as original articles, brief definitive reports, reviews, mini-reviews, images in hepatology and letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信