Behavioural reactivity of indigenous and commercial lambs towards humans

IF 2.2 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Maud Bonato , Jasper J.E. Cloete , Schalk W.P. Cloete
{"title":"Behavioural reactivity of indigenous and commercial lambs towards humans","authors":"Maud Bonato ,&nbsp;Jasper J.E. Cloete ,&nbsp;Schalk W.P. Cloete","doi":"10.1016/j.applanim.2025.106549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Examining breed differences in farm animals is crucial for adopting the best management strategies to promote animal welfare and productivity. Hence, this study investigated whether two sheep breeds farmed in South Africa, one indigenous (Namakwa Afrikaners: NA) and one commercial breed (Dorper: DO), reacted differently when exposed to challenging situations. 323 NA and 358 DO ewe and ram lambs, aged 4 months, were tested over 7 years. These tests involved a stationary, seated human between them and their flock mates (arena test), a mobile human (docility test), and being constrained without the possibility of escape (‘scale test’). In the arena test, we calculated the mean distance from the seated operator and the distance travelled by the test animal. In the docility test, we recorded an individual animal's time to enter and be contained by a mobile handler in a square area of the test arena within 3 min. In the ‘scale-test,’ the animals' behavioural response was recorded using a 5-point scoring system (1 =calm; 5 =wild) at weighing. In all tests, vocalizations and urinations/defecations were recorded. During the arena test, the average distance to the human operator and time spent in the two areas closer to the human operator were independent of breed (P &gt; 0.05). However, DO spent significantly more time in the section farthest from the stationary human (P &lt; 0.05) than NA. Additionally, NA bleated more frequently (P &lt; 0.0001) than DO, and ewes also bleated more than rams (P &lt; 0.05). In the docility test, no difference was observed between breeds and sexes regarding the success of the test and the time contained (P &gt; 0.05). However, NA sheep took longer to enter the marked area than DO (P &lt; 0.05). Ewes also took longer than rams (P &lt; 0.05). Furthermore, NA and ewes vocalized more than DO (P &lt; 0.0001) and rams (P &lt; 0.05). During the scale test, no difference was observed between breeds and sexes regarding the score allocated (P &gt; 0.05), but NA bleated more than DO (P &lt; 0.05). All variables from the three tests, except for success rate, time to enter, time contained and vocalizations from the docility test, varied between years (P &lt; 0.05). Ewes and indigenous NA lambs demonstrated more anxiety in controlled situations, as indicated by their higher frequency of bleating. Therefore, flocks that include NA and/or ewes should be managed with caution, as they are more susceptible to stress during routine husbandry practices involving separation from peers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8222,"journal":{"name":"Applied Animal Behaviour Science","volume":"284 ","pages":"Article 106549"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Animal Behaviour Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168159125000474","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Examining breed differences in farm animals is crucial for adopting the best management strategies to promote animal welfare and productivity. Hence, this study investigated whether two sheep breeds farmed in South Africa, one indigenous (Namakwa Afrikaners: NA) and one commercial breed (Dorper: DO), reacted differently when exposed to challenging situations. 323 NA and 358 DO ewe and ram lambs, aged 4 months, were tested over 7 years. These tests involved a stationary, seated human between them and their flock mates (arena test), a mobile human (docility test), and being constrained without the possibility of escape (‘scale test’). In the arena test, we calculated the mean distance from the seated operator and the distance travelled by the test animal. In the docility test, we recorded an individual animal's time to enter and be contained by a mobile handler in a square area of the test arena within 3 min. In the ‘scale-test,’ the animals' behavioural response was recorded using a 5-point scoring system (1 =calm; 5 =wild) at weighing. In all tests, vocalizations and urinations/defecations were recorded. During the arena test, the average distance to the human operator and time spent in the two areas closer to the human operator were independent of breed (P > 0.05). However, DO spent significantly more time in the section farthest from the stationary human (P < 0.05) than NA. Additionally, NA bleated more frequently (P < 0.0001) than DO, and ewes also bleated more than rams (P < 0.05). In the docility test, no difference was observed between breeds and sexes regarding the success of the test and the time contained (P > 0.05). However, NA sheep took longer to enter the marked area than DO (P < 0.05). Ewes also took longer than rams (P < 0.05). Furthermore, NA and ewes vocalized more than DO (P < 0.0001) and rams (P < 0.05). During the scale test, no difference was observed between breeds and sexes regarding the score allocated (P > 0.05), but NA bleated more than DO (P < 0.05). All variables from the three tests, except for success rate, time to enter, time contained and vocalizations from the docility test, varied between years (P < 0.05). Ewes and indigenous NA lambs demonstrated more anxiety in controlled situations, as indicated by their higher frequency of bleating. Therefore, flocks that include NA and/or ewes should be managed with caution, as they are more susceptible to stress during routine husbandry practices involving separation from peers.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Animal Behaviour Science
Applied Animal Behaviour Science 农林科学-行为科学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
21.70%
发文量
191
审稿时长
18.1 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal publishes relevant information on the behaviour of domesticated and utilized animals. Topics covered include: -Behaviour of farm, zoo and laboratory animals in relation to animal management and welfare -Behaviour of companion animals in relation to behavioural problems, for example, in relation to the training of dogs for different purposes, in relation to behavioural problems -Studies of the behaviour of wild animals when these studies are relevant from an applied perspective, for example in relation to wildlife management, pest management or nature conservation -Methodological studies within relevant fields The principal subjects are farm, companion and laboratory animals, including, of course, poultry. The journal also deals with the following animal subjects: -Those involved in any farming system, e.g. deer, rabbits and fur-bearing animals -Those in ANY form of confinement, e.g. zoos, safari parks and other forms of display -Feral animals, and any animal species which impinge on farming operations, e.g. as causes of loss or damage -Species used for hunting, recreation etc. may also be considered as acceptable subjects in some instances -Laboratory animals, if the material relates to their behavioural requirements
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信