Reinforcement learning-based fuzzy controller for autonomous guided vehicle path tracking

IF 8 1区 工程技术 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Ping-Huan Kuo , Sing-Yan Chen , Po-Hsun Feng , Chen-Wen Chang , Chiou-Jye Huang , Chao-Chung Peng
{"title":"Reinforcement learning-based fuzzy controller for autonomous guided vehicle path tracking","authors":"Ping-Huan Kuo ,&nbsp;Sing-Yan Chen ,&nbsp;Po-Hsun Feng ,&nbsp;Chen-Wen Chang ,&nbsp;Chiou-Jye Huang ,&nbsp;Chao-Chung Peng","doi":"10.1016/j.aei.2025.103180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Automated guided vehicles (AGVs) play a critical role in connecting the entire production line. A fully automated AGV must perform four functions, namely simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM), positioning, routing, and path tracking. In the present study, Hector SLAM, adaptive Monte Carlo localization, and Anytime Repairing A* were used to perform SLAM, localization, and path planning functions, respectively. For path tracking, a fuzzy proximal policy optimization (FPPO) controller was created by applying fuzzy control theory and incorporating reinforcement learning to improve the accuracy of the fuzzy controller’s output. Currently, extensive experience is required to manually design fuzzy rules and membership functions; an inappropriate design can lead to low control precision and poor dynamic system quality. The experimental results in both virtual and real environments demonstrated that the FPPO controller reduced both maximum and mean path tracking errors to a considerably greater extent than did a conventional fuzzy controller. In the virtual environment, the average tracking error for the circular trajectory decreased from 0.05 to 0.02 m, the U-shaped trajectory error decreased from 0.02 to 0.01 m, and the right-angle trajectory error decreased from 0.02 to 0.01 m, highlighting the FPPO controller’s high precision and stability. Similarly, in a real environment, the average tracking error for the circular trajectory decreased from 0.05 to 0.02 m, the U-shaped trajectory error decreased from 0.03 to 0.01 m, and the right-angle trajectory error decreased from 0.02 to 0.01 m. These results indicate that the FPPO controller exhibits exceptional adaptability and reliability across various path types. The FPPO controller overcomes this shortcoming by integrating reinforcement learning to optimize the fuzzy control; the method also provides a self-learning ability to the AGV. By comparison with a conventional fuzzy controller, the FPPO controller was demonstrated to improve the AGV’s path tracking ability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50941,"journal":{"name":"Advanced Engineering Informatics","volume":"65 ","pages":"Article 103180"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advanced Engineering Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1474034625000734","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Automated guided vehicles (AGVs) play a critical role in connecting the entire production line. A fully automated AGV must perform four functions, namely simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM), positioning, routing, and path tracking. In the present study, Hector SLAM, adaptive Monte Carlo localization, and Anytime Repairing A* were used to perform SLAM, localization, and path planning functions, respectively. For path tracking, a fuzzy proximal policy optimization (FPPO) controller was created by applying fuzzy control theory and incorporating reinforcement learning to improve the accuracy of the fuzzy controller’s output. Currently, extensive experience is required to manually design fuzzy rules and membership functions; an inappropriate design can lead to low control precision and poor dynamic system quality. The experimental results in both virtual and real environments demonstrated that the FPPO controller reduced both maximum and mean path tracking errors to a considerably greater extent than did a conventional fuzzy controller. In the virtual environment, the average tracking error for the circular trajectory decreased from 0.05 to 0.02 m, the U-shaped trajectory error decreased from 0.02 to 0.01 m, and the right-angle trajectory error decreased from 0.02 to 0.01 m, highlighting the FPPO controller’s high precision and stability. Similarly, in a real environment, the average tracking error for the circular trajectory decreased from 0.05 to 0.02 m, the U-shaped trajectory error decreased from 0.03 to 0.01 m, and the right-angle trajectory error decreased from 0.02 to 0.01 m. These results indicate that the FPPO controller exhibits exceptional adaptability and reliability across various path types. The FPPO controller overcomes this shortcoming by integrating reinforcement learning to optimize the fuzzy control; the method also provides a self-learning ability to the AGV. By comparison with a conventional fuzzy controller, the FPPO controller was demonstrated to improve the AGV’s path tracking ability.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advanced Engineering Informatics
Advanced Engineering Informatics 工程技术-工程:综合
CiteScore
12.40
自引率
18.20%
发文量
292
审稿时长
45 days
期刊介绍: Advanced Engineering Informatics is an international Journal that solicits research papers with an emphasis on 'knowledge' and 'engineering applications'. The Journal seeks original papers that report progress in applying methods of engineering informatics. These papers should have engineering relevance and help provide a scientific base for more reliable, spontaneous, and creative engineering decision-making. Additionally, papers should demonstrate the science of supporting knowledge-intensive engineering tasks and validate the generality, power, and scalability of new methods through rigorous evaluation, preferably both qualitatively and quantitatively. Abstracting and indexing for Advanced Engineering Informatics include Science Citation Index Expanded, Scopus and INSPEC.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信