Perioperative glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist use and retained gastric contents: A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing elective upper endoscopy

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Jacqueline A. Quinn M.D , Kevin M. Welch M.D , Erina Fujino B.S , Carlos A. Jimenez Rosado M.D , Xinming An Ph.D , Jay W. Schoenherr M.D , Lindsey N. Gouker M.D., M.H.A
{"title":"Perioperative glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist use and retained gastric contents: A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing elective upper endoscopy","authors":"Jacqueline A. Quinn M.D ,&nbsp;Kevin M. Welch M.D ,&nbsp;Erina Fujino B.S ,&nbsp;Carlos A. Jimenez Rosado M.D ,&nbsp;Xinming An Ph.D ,&nbsp;Jay W. Schoenherr M.D ,&nbsp;Lindsey N. Gouker M.D., M.H.A","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinane.2025.111776","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) agonists have been increasingly prescribed for weight loss and glycemic control. The potential side effect of slowed gastric emptying may increase risk of regurgitation and aspiration. Our primary aim was to investigate the incidence of retained gastric contents (RGCs) among appropriately fasted patients taking a GLP-1R agonist compared to those not taking a GLP-1R agonist presenting for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UE).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective chart review of patients undergoing UE was conducted. For the GLP-1R group, included were patients aged 18 years or older who had documentation of taking a GLP-1R agonist within 30 days prior to the procedure, adhered to standard fasting guidelines, and had clear documentation in the electronic medical record of gastric findings during endoscopy. This group was compared to a group of agematched controls. The primary outcome was the incidence of RGCs. Secondary outcome included a propensity-weighted analysis of the odds ratio of taking a GLP-1R and having RGCs.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Included were 940 patients who presented for UE between July 2022 and December 2023 (470 GLP-1R and 470 controls). RGCs were found in 59/470 (12.6 %) of GLP-1R patients compared to 26/470 (5.5 %) of controls (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). Propensity-weighted analysis found a significant association between the use of GLP-1R and retained gastric contents [OR = 1.92, 95 % CI (1.04, 3.53)].</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>A higher incidence of RGCs was found in appropriately fasted patients on a GLP-1R agonist who presented for UE. After controlling for the differences between the two study groups, RGC's were correlated to GLP-1R agonist use. Anesthesiologists should remain vigilant regarding a potential increased risk of RGCs in appropriately fasted patients taking a GLP-1R agonist who present for surgery.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15506,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","volume":"102 ","pages":"Article 111776"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0952818025000364","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) agonists have been increasingly prescribed for weight loss and glycemic control. The potential side effect of slowed gastric emptying may increase risk of regurgitation and aspiration. Our primary aim was to investigate the incidence of retained gastric contents (RGCs) among appropriately fasted patients taking a GLP-1R agonist compared to those not taking a GLP-1R agonist presenting for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UE).

Methods

A retrospective chart review of patients undergoing UE was conducted. For the GLP-1R group, included were patients aged 18 years or older who had documentation of taking a GLP-1R agonist within 30 days prior to the procedure, adhered to standard fasting guidelines, and had clear documentation in the electronic medical record of gastric findings during endoscopy. This group was compared to a group of agematched controls. The primary outcome was the incidence of RGCs. Secondary outcome included a propensity-weighted analysis of the odds ratio of taking a GLP-1R and having RGCs.

Results

Included were 940 patients who presented for UE between July 2022 and December 2023 (470 GLP-1R and 470 controls). RGCs were found in 59/470 (12.6 %) of GLP-1R patients compared to 26/470 (5.5 %) of controls (P < 0.001). Propensity-weighted analysis found a significant association between the use of GLP-1R and retained gastric contents [OR = 1.92, 95 % CI (1.04, 3.53)].

Conclusions

A higher incidence of RGCs was found in appropriately fasted patients on a GLP-1R agonist who presented for UE. After controlling for the differences between the two study groups, RGC's were correlated to GLP-1R agonist use. Anesthesiologists should remain vigilant regarding a potential increased risk of RGCs in appropriately fasted patients taking a GLP-1R agonist who present for surgery.
围手术期胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂的使用和胃内容物的保留:选择性上胃镜检查患者的回顾性分析
lucagon样肽-1受体(GLP-1R)激动剂已越来越多地用于减肥和血糖控制。胃排空缓慢的潜在副作用可能增加反流和误吸的风险。我们的主要目的是调查在适当禁食的服用GLP-1R激动剂的患者与未服用GLP-1R激动剂的患者进行上消化道内窥镜检查(UE)时胃内容物潴留(RGCs)的发生率。方法对UE患者进行回顾性分析。对于GLP-1R组,包括18岁或以上的患者,他们在手术前30天内服用GLP-1R激动剂,遵守标准禁食指南,并在内窥镜检查期间的胃检查结果的电子病历中有明确的记录。将这一组与一组年龄匹配的对照组进行比较。主要终点是RGCs的发生率。次要结局包括对服用GLP-1R和有rgc的比值比的倾向加权分析。结果纳入了940例在2022年7月至2023年12月期间出现UE的患者(470例GLP-1R和470例对照组)。GLP-1R患者中有59/470(12.6%)发现RGCs,对照组为26/470 (5.5%)(P <;0.001)。倾向加权分析发现GLP-1R的使用与胃内容物残留之间存在显著关联[OR = 1.92, 95% CI(1.04, 3.53)]。结论在适当禁食GLP-1R激动剂的患者中,出现UE的RGCs发生率较高。在控制了两个研究组之间的差异后,RGC与GLP-1R激动剂的使用相关。麻醉医师应保持警惕,适当禁食服用GLP-1R激动剂的手术患者发生RGCs的潜在风险增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.50%
发文量
346
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Anesthesia (JCA) addresses all aspects of anesthesia practice, including anesthetic administration, pharmacokinetics, preoperative and postoperative considerations, coexisting disease and other complicating factors, cost issues, and similar concerns anesthesiologists contend with daily. Exceptionally high standards of presentation and accuracy are maintained. The core of the journal is original contributions on subjects relevant to clinical practice, and rigorously peer-reviewed. Highly respected international experts have joined together to form the Editorial Board, sharing their years of experience and clinical expertise. Specialized section editors cover the various subspecialties within the field. To keep your practical clinical skills current, the journal bridges the gap between the laboratory and the clinical practice of anesthesiology and critical care to clarify how new insights can improve daily practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信