ICE-SSD Model: Bridging the Ecological Risk Assessment Gap between Plasticizer and the Substitute

IF 4.8 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Huan-yu Tao, Jianghong Shi*, Jiawei Zhang*, Hui Ge, Xin Ji and Yaobin Meng, 
{"title":"ICE-SSD Model: Bridging the Ecological Risk Assessment Gap between Plasticizer and the Substitute","authors":"Huan-yu Tao,&nbsp;Jianghong Shi*,&nbsp;Jiawei Zhang*,&nbsp;Hui Ge,&nbsp;Xin Ji and Yaobin Meng,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acsestwater.4c0079810.1021/acsestwater.4c00798","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >The eco-safety of plasticizer alternative di-isobutyl phthalate (DiBP) has received continued concerns owing to its large usage as a plasticizer and high detection frequency in environments. The concentrations of dibutyl phthalate (DBP) and DiBP in the surface waters ranged from ng/L to μg/L. However, the accurate ecological risk assessment of alternatives is limited by data on toxic effects and potencies. The interspecies correlation estimation (ICE) model combined with the species sensitivity distribution (SSD) model was used to assess the ecological risk of DBP and DiBP. The acute and reproductive predicted no-effect concentrations (PNECs) were derived as 0.05 mg/L and 1.23 μg/L for DBP and 0.16 mg/L and 0.51 μg/L for DiBP based on ICE-SSD models. Our results showed that acute risks (risk quotient (RQ) &lt; 0.1) in mainland China waterbodies, except Hangzhou Bay, were acceptable. The risk quotients indicated that Yangtze River (RQ = 1.55 and 0.48), Hun River (RQ = 1.74 and 6.03), and Hangzhou Bay (RQ = 7.33 and 13.49) had relatively high ecological risk levels based on the reproductive PNECs of DBP and DiBP. Furthermore, the joint probability curves showed that the ecological risks in Hangzhou Bay needed further concern. Thus, the ICE-SSD model could effectively compensate for the lack of toxicity data in risk assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":93847,"journal":{"name":"ACS ES&T water","volume":"5 2","pages":"727–737 727–737"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS ES&T water","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsestwater.4c00798","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The eco-safety of plasticizer alternative di-isobutyl phthalate (DiBP) has received continued concerns owing to its large usage as a plasticizer and high detection frequency in environments. The concentrations of dibutyl phthalate (DBP) and DiBP in the surface waters ranged from ng/L to μg/L. However, the accurate ecological risk assessment of alternatives is limited by data on toxic effects and potencies. The interspecies correlation estimation (ICE) model combined with the species sensitivity distribution (SSD) model was used to assess the ecological risk of DBP and DiBP. The acute and reproductive predicted no-effect concentrations (PNECs) were derived as 0.05 mg/L and 1.23 μg/L for DBP and 0.16 mg/L and 0.51 μg/L for DiBP based on ICE-SSD models. Our results showed that acute risks (risk quotient (RQ) < 0.1) in mainland China waterbodies, except Hangzhou Bay, were acceptable. The risk quotients indicated that Yangtze River (RQ = 1.55 and 0.48), Hun River (RQ = 1.74 and 6.03), and Hangzhou Bay (RQ = 7.33 and 13.49) had relatively high ecological risk levels based on the reproductive PNECs of DBP and DiBP. Furthermore, the joint probability curves showed that the ecological risks in Hangzhou Bay needed further concern. Thus, the ICE-SSD model could effectively compensate for the lack of toxicity data in risk assessment.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信