Comparative Assessment of Powdered versus Granular Activated Carbon for PFAS Removal in Drinking Water Treatment Plants

IF 4.8 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Mirna Alameddine*, Zhen Liu, Sébastien Sauvé and Benoit Barbeau, 
{"title":"Comparative Assessment of Powdered versus Granular Activated Carbon for PFAS Removal in Drinking Water Treatment Plants","authors":"Mirna Alameddine*,&nbsp;Zhen Liu,&nbsp;Sébastien Sauvé and Benoit Barbeau,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acsestwater.4c0090110.1021/acsestwater.4c00901","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Since the acceptable PFAS levels in drinking water vary among regulatory agencies, drinking water treatment plants (DWTPs) are urged to adapt their processes to improve their removal. This study’s objective was to assess the performance of powdered and granular activated carbon (PAC and GAC) for PFAS removal and evaluate their applications in DWTPs. Raw and filtered waters were used to examine different types of PAC and GAC in batch and rapid small-scale column tests, respectively. A conventional PAC dose (10 mg/L) eliminated 40% of the total PFAS<sub>76</sub> and 25% of long-chain PFAS after 10 min. It would, however, transfer 24 ppb of PFAS<sub>76</sub> daily to the biosolids. A comparable GAC dose (equivalent to 27,000 BV) removed 43% of PFAS<sub>76</sub> and 80% of long-chain PFAS. Considering a medium-sized DWTP with a long-chain PFAS removal target of 80%, a pretreatment with PAC would require an elevated AC dose of 29 mg/L. It will incur the total equivalent cost of a post-treatment with six GAC columns, while remarkably increasing the mass of dry sludge by 46%. Hence, the pretreatment with PAC emerges as better suited for an instant intervention to mitigate PFAS contaminations without revoking the need for a long-term solution.</p>","PeriodicalId":93847,"journal":{"name":"ACS ES&T water","volume":"5 2","pages":"851–861 851–861"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS ES&T water","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsestwater.4c00901","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since the acceptable PFAS levels in drinking water vary among regulatory agencies, drinking water treatment plants (DWTPs) are urged to adapt their processes to improve their removal. This study’s objective was to assess the performance of powdered and granular activated carbon (PAC and GAC) for PFAS removal and evaluate their applications in DWTPs. Raw and filtered waters were used to examine different types of PAC and GAC in batch and rapid small-scale column tests, respectively. A conventional PAC dose (10 mg/L) eliminated 40% of the total PFAS76 and 25% of long-chain PFAS after 10 min. It would, however, transfer 24 ppb of PFAS76 daily to the biosolids. A comparable GAC dose (equivalent to 27,000 BV) removed 43% of PFAS76 and 80% of long-chain PFAS. Considering a medium-sized DWTP with a long-chain PFAS removal target of 80%, a pretreatment with PAC would require an elevated AC dose of 29 mg/L. It will incur the total equivalent cost of a post-treatment with six GAC columns, while remarkably increasing the mass of dry sludge by 46%. Hence, the pretreatment with PAC emerges as better suited for an instant intervention to mitigate PFAS contaminations without revoking the need for a long-term solution.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信