Improving VOC Quantitation Methodology Using Selected Ion Flow Tube Mass Spectrometry

Benjamin M. Gordon, Jaisree Iyer, Christopher A. Harvey, Daniel A. Mew, Karly D. Knox, Susan A. Carroll, Sarah C. Chinn and Steven A. Hawks*, 
{"title":"Improving VOC Quantitation Methodology Using Selected Ion Flow Tube Mass Spectrometry","authors":"Benjamin M. Gordon,&nbsp;Jaisree Iyer,&nbsp;Christopher A. Harvey,&nbsp;Daniel A. Mew,&nbsp;Karly D. Knox,&nbsp;Susan A. Carroll,&nbsp;Sarah C. Chinn and Steven A. Hawks*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acsestair.4c0026310.1021/acsestair.4c00263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Measuring initial volatile organic compound (VOC) concentrations (<i>c</i><sub>0</sub>) is an important first step in the development of mass-transport models in diverse fields, including indoor air quality, food packaging, and biocompatibility. Here, we highlight a previously overlooked methodological issue with techniques employing a re-equilibration step and present an improved experiment based on selected ion flow tube mass spectrometry (SIFT-MS). Specifically, the overlooked aspect of these techniques is unaccounted for VOC loss from the sample during the headspace flushing step. Diffusion modeling indicates that this loss can be significant even when the flushing time is a fraction of the diffusion time. To experimentally demonstrate the impact of mass loss during flushing, we compare the initial concentrations of several volatile methyl siloxanes in Sylgard 184 obtained from multiple headspace extraction (MHE) and a real-time extraction method: TD-SIFT-MS. We find that the TD-SIFT-MS method reports higher <i>c</i><sub>0</sub> values than MHE with a lower temperature dependence. A technique like TD-SIFT-MS is advantageous because it does not require numerous lengthy equilibration steps and offers full awareness of the system dynamics over the course of the experiment.</p>","PeriodicalId":100014,"journal":{"name":"ACS ES&T Air","volume":"2 2","pages":"277–285 277–285"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS ES&T Air","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsestair.4c00263","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Measuring initial volatile organic compound (VOC) concentrations (c0) is an important first step in the development of mass-transport models in diverse fields, including indoor air quality, food packaging, and biocompatibility. Here, we highlight a previously overlooked methodological issue with techniques employing a re-equilibration step and present an improved experiment based on selected ion flow tube mass spectrometry (SIFT-MS). Specifically, the overlooked aspect of these techniques is unaccounted for VOC loss from the sample during the headspace flushing step. Diffusion modeling indicates that this loss can be significant even when the flushing time is a fraction of the diffusion time. To experimentally demonstrate the impact of mass loss during flushing, we compare the initial concentrations of several volatile methyl siloxanes in Sylgard 184 obtained from multiple headspace extraction (MHE) and a real-time extraction method: TD-SIFT-MS. We find that the TD-SIFT-MS method reports higher c0 values than MHE with a lower temperature dependence. A technique like TD-SIFT-MS is advantageous because it does not require numerous lengthy equilibration steps and offers full awareness of the system dynamics over the course of the experiment.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信