Near Complete Removal of Total Mercury and Methylmercury from River Water during the Production of Municipal Drinking Water

IF 4.8 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Jessica A. Serbu*, Jennifer A. Graydon, Jeffrey W. A. Charrois, Craig A. Emmerton and Vincent L. St. Louis, 
{"title":"Near Complete Removal of Total Mercury and Methylmercury from River Water during the Production of Municipal Drinking Water","authors":"Jessica A. Serbu*,&nbsp;Jennifer A. Graydon,&nbsp;Jeffrey W. A. Charrois,&nbsp;Craig A. Emmerton and Vincent L. St. Louis,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acsestwater.4c0075710.1021/acsestwater.4c00757","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >We quantified, for the first time, how efficiently total mercury (THg) and methylmercury (MeHg) were removed from different treatment stages in a conventional drinking water treatment plant. For this, the municipal E.L. Smith Drinking Water Treatment Plant in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada drawing its water from the North Saskatchewan River (NSR) was used as a case study. The major treatment stages involved chemical flocculation and clarification, filtration, and ultraviolet disinfection prior to the processed water being stored in reservoirs for distribution. On average, 75% THg and 66% MeHg were removed from river water following chemical flocculation and clarification. A further 9.8% THg and 31.8% MeHg was removed during filtration, while 1.5% THg and 0.8% MeHg was removed during ultraviolet disinfection. We also examined how open water season (1 May to 31 October) yields of THg and filtered THg changed along the NSR as it flowed from its glacial headwaters through a large reservoir, various ecological subregions (foothills, mixedwood, parkland), and agriculturally dominated land to where it was sourced for drinking water production in Edmonton 534 kms downriver, highlighting value in the protection of source watersheds.</p>","PeriodicalId":93847,"journal":{"name":"ACS ES&T water","volume":"5 2","pages":"686–695 686–695"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS ES&T water","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsestwater.4c00757","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We quantified, for the first time, how efficiently total mercury (THg) and methylmercury (MeHg) were removed from different treatment stages in a conventional drinking water treatment plant. For this, the municipal E.L. Smith Drinking Water Treatment Plant in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada drawing its water from the North Saskatchewan River (NSR) was used as a case study. The major treatment stages involved chemical flocculation and clarification, filtration, and ultraviolet disinfection prior to the processed water being stored in reservoirs for distribution. On average, 75% THg and 66% MeHg were removed from river water following chemical flocculation and clarification. A further 9.8% THg and 31.8% MeHg was removed during filtration, while 1.5% THg and 0.8% MeHg was removed during ultraviolet disinfection. We also examined how open water season (1 May to 31 October) yields of THg and filtered THg changed along the NSR as it flowed from its glacial headwaters through a large reservoir, various ecological subregions (foothills, mixedwood, parkland), and agriculturally dominated land to where it was sourced for drinking water production in Edmonton 534 kms downriver, highlighting value in the protection of source watersheds.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信