Temporal and Spatial Variation in Hydroxyl Radical Scavenging Capacity in Drinking Water and Correlation to Water Quality Parameters

IF 4.8 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Tianyi Chen, Martha J.M. Wells, Erin Mackey, Susan Andrews and Ron Hofmann*, 
{"title":"Temporal and Spatial Variation in Hydroxyl Radical Scavenging Capacity in Drinking Water and Correlation to Water Quality Parameters","authors":"Tianyi Chen,&nbsp;Martha J.M. Wells,&nbsp;Erin Mackey,&nbsp;Susan Andrews and Ron Hofmann*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acsestwater.4c0090710.1021/acsestwater.4c00907","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) are being used more frequently in drinking water treatment plants for purposes such as removing taste and odor-causing compounds or to control recalcitrant organic contaminants. Water’s hydroxyl radical scavenging capacity (<i>S</i><sub>c</sub>) is an important parameter for AOP design and operation, but due to complexity in its measurement, <i>S</i><sub>c</sub> data are limited and knowledge of its temporal and spatial variation is sparse. Furthermore, the feasibility of estimating <i>S</i><sub>c</sub> through monitoring common water quality parameters is unclear. The variability in <i>S</i><sub>c</sub> of water from five surface water plants and one groundwater plant was measured for 1 year along with total organic carbon, total inorganic carbon, ultraviolet absorbance at 254 nm, and fluorescence emission-excitation matrices. The results showed about a 10–25% variation in the <i>S</i><sub>c</sub>, and <i>S</i><sub>c</sub> was not well-correlated with any of the water quality parameters measured. The reduction in <i>S</i><sub>c</sub> across ultrafiltration treatment was similar to that across conventional treatment (15–30%). Due to the scavenging capacity of the added oxidant, the modeled variation in UV/H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> or UV/chlorine performance due to <i>S</i><sub>c</sub> variation was small (∼5–10% change in the pollutant removal rate).</p>","PeriodicalId":93847,"journal":{"name":"ACS ES&T water","volume":"5 2","pages":"862–870 862–870"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS ES&T water","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsestwater.4c00907","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) are being used more frequently in drinking water treatment plants for purposes such as removing taste and odor-causing compounds or to control recalcitrant organic contaminants. Water’s hydroxyl radical scavenging capacity (Sc) is an important parameter for AOP design and operation, but due to complexity in its measurement, Sc data are limited and knowledge of its temporal and spatial variation is sparse. Furthermore, the feasibility of estimating Sc through monitoring common water quality parameters is unclear. The variability in Sc of water from five surface water plants and one groundwater plant was measured for 1 year along with total organic carbon, total inorganic carbon, ultraviolet absorbance at 254 nm, and fluorescence emission-excitation matrices. The results showed about a 10–25% variation in the Sc, and Sc was not well-correlated with any of the water quality parameters measured. The reduction in Sc across ultrafiltration treatment was similar to that across conventional treatment (15–30%). Due to the scavenging capacity of the added oxidant, the modeled variation in UV/H2O2 or UV/chlorine performance due to Sc variation was small (∼5–10% change in the pollutant removal rate).

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信