Tianyi Chen, Martha J.M. Wells, Erin Mackey, Susan Andrews and Ron Hofmann*,
{"title":"Temporal and Spatial Variation in Hydroxyl Radical Scavenging Capacity in Drinking Water and Correlation to Water Quality Parameters","authors":"Tianyi Chen, Martha J.M. Wells, Erin Mackey, Susan Andrews and Ron Hofmann*, ","doi":"10.1021/acsestwater.4c0090710.1021/acsestwater.4c00907","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) are being used more frequently in drinking water treatment plants for purposes such as removing taste and odor-causing compounds or to control recalcitrant organic contaminants. Water’s hydroxyl radical scavenging capacity (<i>S</i><sub>c</sub>) is an important parameter for AOP design and operation, but due to complexity in its measurement, <i>S</i><sub>c</sub> data are limited and knowledge of its temporal and spatial variation is sparse. Furthermore, the feasibility of estimating <i>S</i><sub>c</sub> through monitoring common water quality parameters is unclear. The variability in <i>S</i><sub>c</sub> of water from five surface water plants and one groundwater plant was measured for 1 year along with total organic carbon, total inorganic carbon, ultraviolet absorbance at 254 nm, and fluorescence emission-excitation matrices. The results showed about a 10–25% variation in the <i>S</i><sub>c</sub>, and <i>S</i><sub>c</sub> was not well-correlated with any of the water quality parameters measured. The reduction in <i>S</i><sub>c</sub> across ultrafiltration treatment was similar to that across conventional treatment (15–30%). Due to the scavenging capacity of the added oxidant, the modeled variation in UV/H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> or UV/chlorine performance due to <i>S</i><sub>c</sub> variation was small (∼5–10% change in the pollutant removal rate).</p>","PeriodicalId":93847,"journal":{"name":"ACS ES&T water","volume":"5 2","pages":"862–870 862–870"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS ES&T water","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsestwater.4c00907","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) are being used more frequently in drinking water treatment plants for purposes such as removing taste and odor-causing compounds or to control recalcitrant organic contaminants. Water’s hydroxyl radical scavenging capacity (Sc) is an important parameter for AOP design and operation, but due to complexity in its measurement, Sc data are limited and knowledge of its temporal and spatial variation is sparse. Furthermore, the feasibility of estimating Sc through monitoring common water quality parameters is unclear. The variability in Sc of water from five surface water plants and one groundwater plant was measured for 1 year along with total organic carbon, total inorganic carbon, ultraviolet absorbance at 254 nm, and fluorescence emission-excitation matrices. The results showed about a 10–25% variation in the Sc, and Sc was not well-correlated with any of the water quality parameters measured. The reduction in Sc across ultrafiltration treatment was similar to that across conventional treatment (15–30%). Due to the scavenging capacity of the added oxidant, the modeled variation in UV/H2O2 or UV/chlorine performance due to Sc variation was small (∼5–10% change in the pollutant removal rate).