Oral COVID-19 antiviral prescribing in Australian general practice - a retrospective observational study.

Judith Thomas, Abbish Kamalakkannan, Mirela Prgomet, Karina Gardner, Precious McGuire, Geoffrey Campbell, Andrew Georgiou
{"title":"Oral COVID-19 antiviral prescribing in Australian general practice - a retrospective observational study.","authors":"Judith Thomas, Abbish Kamalakkannan, Mirela Prgomet, Karina Gardner, Precious McGuire, Geoffrey Campbell, Andrew Georgiou","doi":"10.1071/PY24170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background This study aimed to gain a comprehensive understanding of oral COVID-19 antiviral prescribing in Australian general practice. Methods The study was a retrospective observational cohort study. Routinely collected, de-identified, Australian general practice consultation and prescription data was used with permission from participating primary health networks, from 938 general practices between March 2022 and September 2023. Study cohorts were patients aged ≥15 encompassing (i) an 'antiviral cohort' comprising patient records with ≥1 oral COVID-19 antiviral prescription/s and (ii) a 'comparison cohort' of remaining records. Primary outcome measures were the frequency and type of oral COVID-19 antivirals prescribed, and sociodemographic and health characteristics of patients prescribed antivirals. Secondary measures were the frequency of antiviral repeat prescribing and consultation modality. Results Within the study population of 3,813,051 patients, oral COVID-19 antivirals were prescribed to 3.39% (129,267) of patients including 14.79% (82,215/555,757) of patients aged ≥70years. Molnupiravir prescribing exceeded nirmatrelvir-ritonavir across all study months. Proportionally, antiviral prescribing was higher in the female population (74,709/2,059,676: 3.63%), Victoria (81,184/2,222,837: 3.65%), residing in high socioeconomic advantage areas (87,530/2,224,501: 3.93%), and ages 80-84 years (16,419/100,911: 16.27%). Of patients prescribed COVID-19 antivirals, 7.27% (9402/129,267) had repeat prescribing. Cardiovascular and musculoskeletal conditions were the most prevalent chronic diagnoses, and telehealth (58,660/107,727: 54.45%) exceeded face-to-face consultations. Conclusions Oral COVID-19 antiviral prescribing volumes in general practice may serve as an indicator of periods of increased transmission of COVID-19, through increases in prescribing activity. Telehealth exceeding face-to-face for oral COVID-19 antiviral prescribing supports continued access to telehealth to reduce exposure to COVID-19 and provide time-critical access to treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":93892,"journal":{"name":"Australian journal of primary health","volume":"31 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian journal of primary health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/PY24170","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background This study aimed to gain a comprehensive understanding of oral COVID-19 antiviral prescribing in Australian general practice. Methods The study was a retrospective observational cohort study. Routinely collected, de-identified, Australian general practice consultation and prescription data was used with permission from participating primary health networks, from 938 general practices between March 2022 and September 2023. Study cohorts were patients aged ≥15 encompassing (i) an 'antiviral cohort' comprising patient records with ≥1 oral COVID-19 antiviral prescription/s and (ii) a 'comparison cohort' of remaining records. Primary outcome measures were the frequency and type of oral COVID-19 antivirals prescribed, and sociodemographic and health characteristics of patients prescribed antivirals. Secondary measures were the frequency of antiviral repeat prescribing and consultation modality. Results Within the study population of 3,813,051 patients, oral COVID-19 antivirals were prescribed to 3.39% (129,267) of patients including 14.79% (82,215/555,757) of patients aged ≥70years. Molnupiravir prescribing exceeded nirmatrelvir-ritonavir across all study months. Proportionally, antiviral prescribing was higher in the female population (74,709/2,059,676: 3.63%), Victoria (81,184/2,222,837: 3.65%), residing in high socioeconomic advantage areas (87,530/2,224,501: 3.93%), and ages 80-84 years (16,419/100,911: 16.27%). Of patients prescribed COVID-19 antivirals, 7.27% (9402/129,267) had repeat prescribing. Cardiovascular and musculoskeletal conditions were the most prevalent chronic diagnoses, and telehealth (58,660/107,727: 54.45%) exceeded face-to-face consultations. Conclusions Oral COVID-19 antiviral prescribing volumes in general practice may serve as an indicator of periods of increased transmission of COVID-19, through increases in prescribing activity. Telehealth exceeding face-to-face for oral COVID-19 antiviral prescribing supports continued access to telehealth to reduce exposure to COVID-19 and provide time-critical access to treatment.

澳大利亚全科医生口服COVID-19抗病毒药物处方——一项回顾性观察研究
本研究旨在全面了解澳大利亚全科医生口服COVID-19抗病毒药物的处方情况。方法采用回顾性观察队列研究。在参与的初级卫生网络的许可下,从2022年3月至2023年9月期间的938例全科医生中,常规收集、去识别的澳大利亚全科医生咨询和处方数据被使用。研究队列为年龄≥15岁的患者,包括(i)一个“抗病毒队列”,包括服用≥1张口服COVID-19抗病毒处方的患者记录,以及(ii)一个“比较队列”,包括剩余记录。主要观察指标为口服COVID-19抗病毒药物的使用频率和类型,以及服用抗病毒药物患者的社会人口统计学和健康特征。次要指标为抗病毒药物重复处方频率和会诊方式。结果3813051例患者中,3.39%(129267例)的患者使用了口服COVID-19抗病毒药物,其中年龄≥70岁的患者占14.79%(82215 / 555757)。在所有的研究月份中,莫努匹拉韦的处方量都超过了尼马特韦-利托那韦。从比例上看,女性人群(74,709/2,059,676:3.63%)、维多利亚州(81,184/2,222,837:3.65%)、高社会经济优势地区(87,530/2,224,501:3.93%)和80-84岁人群(16,419/100,911:16.27%)的抗病毒药物处方率较高。在使用COVID-19抗病毒药物的患者中,有7.27%(9402/ 129267)存在重复处方。心血管和肌肉骨骼疾病是最常见的慢性诊断,远程医疗(58,660/107,727:54.45%)超过了面对面咨询。结论:普通医疗中口服COVID-19抗病毒药物处方量可通过处方活动的增加作为COVID-19传播增加时期的指标。在口服COVID-19抗病毒药物处方方面,远程医疗超过面对面,这有助于继续获得远程医疗,以减少与COVID-19的接触,并提供及时的治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信