{"title":"Restoring hemostasis with prothrombin complex concentrate: benefits and risks in trauma-induced coagulopathy.","authors":"Oliver Grottke, Lars Heubner","doi":"10.1097/ACO.0000000000001464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of this review: </strong>To provide evidence for the use of prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) as a potential hemostatic treatment for trauma-induced coagulopathy with and without anticoagulants.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>PCC is effective in enhancing thrombin generation and achieving hemostasis in traumatized patients under anticoagulants. For vitamin K antagonist (VKA) reversal, it shows superior efficacy over fresh frozen plasma, achieving rapid normalization of the international normalized ratio normalization and reduced transfusion needs. In direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC)-associated bleeding, PCC offers an alternative when specific antidotes are unavailable. However, evidence from randomized trials in the field of trauma and coagulopathy is limited, and the results have shown conflicting outcomes in terms of mortality reduction. Further, following PCC application, thromboembolic risks remain a particular concern. Monitoring tools such as thrombin generation assays and point-of-care tests show promise but are not universally available.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>PCC is a valuable option for managing coagulopathy in specific settings, especially VKA and DOAC reversal. Based on current evidence, we caution against the use of PCC as a versatile hemostatic agent suitable for indications involving multiple clotting factor deficiencies for uncontrolled coagulopathic bleeding in trauma or other clinical settings outside anticoagulation reversal. The risk vs. benefit profile should be carefully examined, similar to any other agent.</p>","PeriodicalId":50609,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ACO.0000000000001464","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose of this review: To provide evidence for the use of prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) as a potential hemostatic treatment for trauma-induced coagulopathy with and without anticoagulants.
Recent findings: PCC is effective in enhancing thrombin generation and achieving hemostasis in traumatized patients under anticoagulants. For vitamin K antagonist (VKA) reversal, it shows superior efficacy over fresh frozen plasma, achieving rapid normalization of the international normalized ratio normalization and reduced transfusion needs. In direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC)-associated bleeding, PCC offers an alternative when specific antidotes are unavailable. However, evidence from randomized trials in the field of trauma and coagulopathy is limited, and the results have shown conflicting outcomes in terms of mortality reduction. Further, following PCC application, thromboembolic risks remain a particular concern. Monitoring tools such as thrombin generation assays and point-of-care tests show promise but are not universally available.
Summary: PCC is a valuable option for managing coagulopathy in specific settings, especially VKA and DOAC reversal. Based on current evidence, we caution against the use of PCC as a versatile hemostatic agent suitable for indications involving multiple clotting factor deficiencies for uncontrolled coagulopathic bleeding in trauma or other clinical settings outside anticoagulation reversal. The risk vs. benefit profile should be carefully examined, similar to any other agent.
期刊介绍:
Published bimonthly and offering a unique and wide ranging perspective on the key developments in the field, each issue of Current Opinion in Anesthesiology features hand-picked review articles from our team of expert editors. With fifteen disciplines published across the year – including cardiovascular anesthesiology, neuroanesthesia and pain medicine – every issue also contains annotated references detailing the merits of the most important papers.