Restoring hemostasis with prothrombin complex concentrate: benefits and risks in trauma-induced coagulopathy.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Oliver Grottke, Lars Heubner
{"title":"Restoring hemostasis with prothrombin complex concentrate: benefits and risks in trauma-induced coagulopathy.","authors":"Oliver Grottke, Lars Heubner","doi":"10.1097/ACO.0000000000001464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of this review: </strong>To provide evidence for the use of prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) as a potential hemostatic treatment for trauma-induced coagulopathy with and without anticoagulants.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>PCC is effective in enhancing thrombin generation and achieving hemostasis in traumatized patients under anticoagulants. For vitamin K antagonist (VKA) reversal, it shows superior efficacy over fresh frozen plasma, achieving rapid normalization of the international normalized ratio normalization and reduced transfusion needs. In direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC)-associated bleeding, PCC offers an alternative when specific antidotes are unavailable. However, evidence from randomized trials in the field of trauma and coagulopathy is limited, and the results have shown conflicting outcomes in terms of mortality reduction. Further, following PCC application, thromboembolic risks remain a particular concern. Monitoring tools such as thrombin generation assays and point-of-care tests show promise but are not universally available.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>PCC is a valuable option for managing coagulopathy in specific settings, especially VKA and DOAC reversal. Based on current evidence, we caution against the use of PCC as a versatile hemostatic agent suitable for indications involving multiple clotting factor deficiencies for uncontrolled coagulopathic bleeding in trauma or other clinical settings outside anticoagulation reversal. The risk vs. benefit profile should be carefully examined, similar to any other agent.</p>","PeriodicalId":50609,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ACO.0000000000001464","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of this review: To provide evidence for the use of prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) as a potential hemostatic treatment for trauma-induced coagulopathy with and without anticoagulants.

Recent findings: PCC is effective in enhancing thrombin generation and achieving hemostasis in traumatized patients under anticoagulants. For vitamin K antagonist (VKA) reversal, it shows superior efficacy over fresh frozen plasma, achieving rapid normalization of the international normalized ratio normalization and reduced transfusion needs. In direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC)-associated bleeding, PCC offers an alternative when specific antidotes are unavailable. However, evidence from randomized trials in the field of trauma and coagulopathy is limited, and the results have shown conflicting outcomes in terms of mortality reduction. Further, following PCC application, thromboembolic risks remain a particular concern. Monitoring tools such as thrombin generation assays and point-of-care tests show promise but are not universally available.

Summary: PCC is a valuable option for managing coagulopathy in specific settings, especially VKA and DOAC reversal. Based on current evidence, we caution against the use of PCC as a versatile hemostatic agent suitable for indications involving multiple clotting factor deficiencies for uncontrolled coagulopathic bleeding in trauma or other clinical settings outside anticoagulation reversal. The risk vs. benefit profile should be carefully examined, similar to any other agent.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.00%
发文量
207
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​​​Published bimonthly and offering a unique and wide ranging perspective on the key developments in the field, each issue of Current Opinion in Anesthesiology features hand-picked review articles from our team of expert editors. With fifteen disciplines published across the year – including cardiovascular anesthesiology, neuroanesthesia and pain medicine – every issue also contains annotated references detailing the merits of the most important papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信