Naming and Framing: Six Principles for Embedding Health Equity Language in Policy Research, Writing, and Practice.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Milbank Quarterly Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1111/1468-0009.70000
Kamaria Kaalund, Jay A Pearson, Andrea Thoumi
{"title":"Naming and Framing: Six Principles for Embedding Health Equity Language in Policy Research, Writing, and Practice.","authors":"Kamaria Kaalund, Jay A Pearson, Andrea Thoumi","doi":"10.1111/1468-0009.70000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Policy Points Science communication and health policy language often fail to adequately define and contextualize systemic barriers-like structural racism and wealth inequity-that contribute to disparities in health outcomes. Health policy practitioners should understand best practices for communicating research and policy findings to various audiences and understand how to disseminate messages that are culturally and linguistically responsive to different community needs. As no perfect term exists, adopting health equity language principles can help health policy practitioners avoid dehumanizing and exclusionary language as well as ill-suited terminology that perpetuates racist systems and leads to inequities in population health.</p><p><strong>Context: </strong>Language specificity in research, advocacy, and writing is an important tool to ensure more equitable health policies. All health policy practitioners working at the intersection of health care, health policy, and health equity have a role in upholding ethical standards that promote the use of humanizing, inclusive, and antisupremacist language.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an environmental scan and synthesized themes across commonly used and publicly available health equity language guides to provide specific guidance to health policy practitioners to inform their policy research, analysis, writing, and dissemination.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>We identify and describe six guiding principles to dismantle systems that work against the goals of health equity through policy-focused research, writing, and communications. These principles include avoiding blaming language, contextualizing health inequities, acknowledging that systems are not passive, understanding that one-size-fits-all terminology does not exist, seeking input from community members, and paying attention to omissions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Applying these principles will better equip health policy practitioners to develop or inform equitable policies and meaningfully engage in dialogue with community members to advance equitable health policy.</p>","PeriodicalId":49810,"journal":{"name":"Milbank Quarterly","volume":" ","pages":"130-152"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11923698/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Milbank Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.70000","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Policy Points Science communication and health policy language often fail to adequately define and contextualize systemic barriers-like structural racism and wealth inequity-that contribute to disparities in health outcomes. Health policy practitioners should understand best practices for communicating research and policy findings to various audiences and understand how to disseminate messages that are culturally and linguistically responsive to different community needs. As no perfect term exists, adopting health equity language principles can help health policy practitioners avoid dehumanizing and exclusionary language as well as ill-suited terminology that perpetuates racist systems and leads to inequities in population health.

Context: Language specificity in research, advocacy, and writing is an important tool to ensure more equitable health policies. All health policy practitioners working at the intersection of health care, health policy, and health equity have a role in upholding ethical standards that promote the use of humanizing, inclusive, and antisupremacist language.

Methods: We conducted an environmental scan and synthesized themes across commonly used and publicly available health equity language guides to provide specific guidance to health policy practitioners to inform their policy research, analysis, writing, and dissemination.

Findings: We identify and describe six guiding principles to dismantle systems that work against the goals of health equity through policy-focused research, writing, and communications. These principles include avoiding blaming language, contextualizing health inequities, acknowledging that systems are not passive, understanding that one-size-fits-all terminology does not exist, seeking input from community members, and paying attention to omissions.

Conclusions: Applying these principles will better equip health policy practitioners to develop or inform equitable policies and meaningfully engage in dialogue with community members to advance equitable health policy.

命名和框架:在政策研究、写作和实践中嵌入卫生公平语言的六项原则。
科学传播和卫生政策语言往往不能充分定义和背景系统障碍-如结构性种族主义和财富不平等-导致健康结果的差异。卫生政策从业人员应了解向不同受众传播研究和政策结果的最佳做法,并了解如何传播在文化和语言上符合不同社区需求的信息。由于不存在完美的术语,采用卫生公平语言原则可以帮助卫生政策从业者避免非人性化和排斥性语言以及使种族主义制度永久化并导致人口健康不平等的不合适术语。背景:研究、宣传和写作中的语言特异性是确保更公平的卫生政策的重要工具。所有从事卫生保健、卫生政策和卫生公平交叉工作的卫生政策从业人员都有责任维护道德标准,促进使用人性化、包容性和反至上主义的语言。方法:我们对常用的和公开的卫生公平语言指南进行了环境扫描和综合主题,为卫生政策从业人员提供具体指导,以便为他们的政策研究、分析、写作和传播提供信息。研究结果:我们通过以政策为重点的研究、写作和交流,确定并描述了六项指导原则,以消除不利于卫生公平目标的系统。这些原则包括避免指责语言,将卫生不公平置于环境中,承认系统不是被动的,理解不存在放之四海而皆准的术语,寻求社区成员的投入,并注意遗漏。结论:应用这些原则将使卫生政策从业者更好地掌握制定公平政策或为公平政策提供信息的能力,并有意义地与社区成员进行对话,以推进公平的卫生政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Milbank Quarterly
Milbank Quarterly 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
3.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Milbank Quarterly is devoted to scholarly analysis of significant issues in health and health care policy. It presents original research, policy analysis, and commentary from academics, clinicians, and policymakers. The in-depth, multidisciplinary approach of the journal permits contributors to explore fully the social origins of health in our society and to examine in detail the implications of different health policies. Topics addressed in The Milbank Quarterly include the impact of social factors on health, prevention, allocation of health care resources, legal and ethical issues in health policy, health and health care administration, and the organization and financing of health care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信