Sharing a Hybrid EHR + FHIR CDS Tool Across Health Systems: Automating Smoking Cessation for Pediatric Caregivers.

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Sameh Nagui Saleh, Eric Kim, Jeritt G Thayer, Emara Nabi, Dean Karavite, Jonathan Winickoff, Alexander Fiks, Brian P Jenssen, Nicholas Riley, Robert W Grundmeier
{"title":"Sharing a Hybrid EHR + FHIR CDS Tool Across Health Systems: Automating Smoking Cessation for Pediatric Caregivers.","authors":"Sameh Nagui Saleh, Eric Kim, Jeritt G Thayer, Emara Nabi, Dean Karavite, Jonathan Winickoff, Alexander Fiks, Brian P Jenssen, Nicholas Riley, Robert W Grundmeier","doi":"10.1055/a-2535-5823","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objective Experiences sharing complex workflow-integrated clinical decision support (CDS) across health systems are sparse and not well reported. This case study presents the sharing of a hybrid electronic health record (EHR)-native and SMART-compatible CDS tool for automating provision of smoking cessation treatment for caregivers during pediatric visits. Materials & Methods We conducted a comprehensive needs assessment using socio-technical frameworks to identify workflow gaps and technical requirements. A multidisciplinary team of clinical informaticians, software developers, and EHR analysts guided the technology transfer. Iterative testing and feedback informed modifications. The evaluation tracked questionnaire uptake, tobacco use identification rates, and treatment acceptance metrics. Results The needs assessment revealed critical artifacts such as data architecture, source code repositories, and regulatory requirements, which informed adaptations for the recipient health system. In the pre-implementation phase, JXPORT was identified for transferring EHR-native components and the EHR's Active Guidelines Framework was needed to extend the FHIR standard with ordering, posting flowsheet values, and launching activities in the embedded web application. The implementation process resulted in key modifications including same-day nicotine replacement therapy delivery through internal pharmacy services and optimized questionnaire design to improve usability. At the source system, 5.8% (n=3391) of caregivers reported active tobacco use with 46.9% (n=1590) accepting cessation resources. At the recipient system, 24.3% (n=167) of caregivers listed tobacco use and 28.1% (n=47) accepted treatment. Conclusions The cross-system sharing of eCEASE serves as a nascent model for disseminating complex CDS tools and highlighted opportunities for improvement. Future work should focus on creating validated dissemination frameworks and improving use of standards for EHR integration.</p>","PeriodicalId":48956,"journal":{"name":"Applied Clinical Informatics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Clinical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2535-5823","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective Experiences sharing complex workflow-integrated clinical decision support (CDS) across health systems are sparse and not well reported. This case study presents the sharing of a hybrid electronic health record (EHR)-native and SMART-compatible CDS tool for automating provision of smoking cessation treatment for caregivers during pediatric visits. Materials & Methods We conducted a comprehensive needs assessment using socio-technical frameworks to identify workflow gaps and technical requirements. A multidisciplinary team of clinical informaticians, software developers, and EHR analysts guided the technology transfer. Iterative testing and feedback informed modifications. The evaluation tracked questionnaire uptake, tobacco use identification rates, and treatment acceptance metrics. Results The needs assessment revealed critical artifacts such as data architecture, source code repositories, and regulatory requirements, which informed adaptations for the recipient health system. In the pre-implementation phase, JXPORT was identified for transferring EHR-native components and the EHR's Active Guidelines Framework was needed to extend the FHIR standard with ordering, posting flowsheet values, and launching activities in the embedded web application. The implementation process resulted in key modifications including same-day nicotine replacement therapy delivery through internal pharmacy services and optimized questionnaire design to improve usability. At the source system, 5.8% (n=3391) of caregivers reported active tobacco use with 46.9% (n=1590) accepting cessation resources. At the recipient system, 24.3% (n=167) of caregivers listed tobacco use and 28.1% (n=47) accepted treatment. Conclusions The cross-system sharing of eCEASE serves as a nascent model for disseminating complex CDS tools and highlighted opportunities for improvement. Future work should focus on creating validated dissemination frameworks and improving use of standards for EHR integration.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Clinical Informatics
Applied Clinical Informatics MEDICAL INFORMATICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
24.10%
发文量
132
期刊介绍: ACI is the third Schattauer journal dealing with biomedical and health informatics. It perfectly complements our other journals Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterMethods of Information in Medicine and the Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterYearbook of Medical Informatics. The Yearbook of Medical Informatics being the “Milestone” or state-of-the-art journal and Methods of Information in Medicine being the “Science and Research” journal of IMIA, ACI intends to be the “Practical” journal of IMIA.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信