Proposal and Validation of the Minimum Clinically Important Difference in Emphysema Progression.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Emily S Y Ho, Paul R Ellis, Diana Kavanagh, Deepak Subramanian, Robert A Stockley, Alice M Turner
{"title":"Proposal and Validation of the Minimum Clinically Important Difference in Emphysema Progression.","authors":"Emily S Y Ho, Paul R Ellis, Diana Kavanagh, Deepak Subramanian, Robert A Stockley, Alice M Turner","doi":"10.15326/jcopdf.2024.0511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The severity of emphysema may be measured by lung density on CT scanning, and in alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency (AATD) this measure has been used as the primary outcome in trials of disease modifying therapy, namely augmentation. However, the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) in lung density change is not known; this study aimed to derive and validate MCIDs for density values in AATD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The distribution method and anchoring density against FEV1 was used to derive mean and 95% confidence intervals for the MCID. Data from systematic reviews of CT density measurement and therapy for AATD obtained both absolute and annual change in lung density. Using the range of potential MCID generated by these methods, a value was chosen for validation against mortality, lung function and health status in the Birmingham (UK) AATD cohort, using regression to adjust for confounders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Anchor and distribution methods generated a probable MCID of -1.87 g/L/year (range -1.53 to -2.20). The greatest differences between groups were found at the -2.2g/L/year with a greater FEV1 decline in individuals with greater lung loss. Absolute lung density change had a probable MCID of -2.04g/L (range -1.83 to -2.30), and there was a difference in lung function (p<0.001) and mortality; where individuals whose absolute lung loss of more than -2.04g/L had a greater risk of death (p<0.05).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>From initial evidence, we have shown absolute lung density change as a potential outcome for emphysema modifying therapies in AATD than annual density change, with an MCID of -2.04g/L.</p>","PeriodicalId":51340,"journal":{"name":"Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases-Journal of the Copd Foundation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases-Journal of the Copd Foundation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15326/jcopdf.2024.0511","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The severity of emphysema may be measured by lung density on CT scanning, and in alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency (AATD) this measure has been used as the primary outcome in trials of disease modifying therapy, namely augmentation. However, the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) in lung density change is not known; this study aimed to derive and validate MCIDs for density values in AATD.

Methods: The distribution method and anchoring density against FEV1 was used to derive mean and 95% confidence intervals for the MCID. Data from systematic reviews of CT density measurement and therapy for AATD obtained both absolute and annual change in lung density. Using the range of potential MCID generated by these methods, a value was chosen for validation against mortality, lung function and health status in the Birmingham (UK) AATD cohort, using regression to adjust for confounders.

Results: Anchor and distribution methods generated a probable MCID of -1.87 g/L/year (range -1.53 to -2.20). The greatest differences between groups were found at the -2.2g/L/year with a greater FEV1 decline in individuals with greater lung loss. Absolute lung density change had a probable MCID of -2.04g/L (range -1.83 to -2.30), and there was a difference in lung function (p<0.001) and mortality; where individuals whose absolute lung loss of more than -2.04g/L had a greater risk of death (p<0.05).

Interpretation: From initial evidence, we have shown absolute lung density change as a potential outcome for emphysema modifying therapies in AATD than annual density change, with an MCID of -2.04g/L.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
45
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信