Proposal and Validation of the Minimum Clinically Important Difference in Emphysema Progression.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Emily S Y Ho, Paul R Ellis, Diana Kavanagh, Deepak Subramanian, Robert A Stockley, Alice M Turner
{"title":"Proposal and Validation of the Minimum Clinically Important Difference in Emphysema Progression.","authors":"Emily S Y Ho, Paul R Ellis, Diana Kavanagh, Deepak Subramanian, Robert A Stockley, Alice M Turner","doi":"10.15326/jcopdf.2024.0511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The severity of emphysema may be measured by lung density on computed tomography (CT) scanning, and in alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency (AATD) this measure has been used as the primary outcome in trials of disease-modifying therapy, namely augmentation. However, the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) in lung density change is not known; this study aimed to derive and validate MCIDs for density values in AATD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The distribution method and anchoring density against forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV<sub>1</sub>) were used to derive mean and 95% confidence intervals for the MCID. Data from systematic reviews of CT density measurement and therapy for AATD obtained both absolute and annual changes in lung density. Using the range of potential MCID generated by these methods, a value was chosen for validation against mortality, lung function, and health status in the Birmingham, United Kingdom AATD cohort, using regression to adjust for confounders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Anchor and distribution methods generated a probable MCID of -1.87 g/L/year (range -1.53 to -2.20). The greatest differences between groups were found at the -2.2g/L/year with a greater FEV<sub>1</sub> decline in individuals with greater lung loss. Absolute lung density change had a probable MCID of -2.04g/L (range -1.83 to -2.30), and there was a difference in lung function (<i>p</i><0.001) and mortality; where individuals whose absolute lung loss of more than -2.04g/L had a greater risk of death (<i>p</i><0.05).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>From initial evidence, we have shown absolute lung density change as a potential outcome for emphysema modifying therapies in AATD rather than annual density change, with an MCID of -2.04g/L.</p>","PeriodicalId":51340,"journal":{"name":"Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases-Journal of the Copd Foundation","volume":" ","pages":"109-116"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases-Journal of the Copd Foundation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15326/jcopdf.2024.0511","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The severity of emphysema may be measured by lung density on computed tomography (CT) scanning, and in alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency (AATD) this measure has been used as the primary outcome in trials of disease-modifying therapy, namely augmentation. However, the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) in lung density change is not known; this study aimed to derive and validate MCIDs for density values in AATD.

Methods: The distribution method and anchoring density against forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) were used to derive mean and 95% confidence intervals for the MCID. Data from systematic reviews of CT density measurement and therapy for AATD obtained both absolute and annual changes in lung density. Using the range of potential MCID generated by these methods, a value was chosen for validation against mortality, lung function, and health status in the Birmingham, United Kingdom AATD cohort, using regression to adjust for confounders.

Results: Anchor and distribution methods generated a probable MCID of -1.87 g/L/year (range -1.53 to -2.20). The greatest differences between groups were found at the -2.2g/L/year with a greater FEV1 decline in individuals with greater lung loss. Absolute lung density change had a probable MCID of -2.04g/L (range -1.83 to -2.30), and there was a difference in lung function (p<0.001) and mortality; where individuals whose absolute lung loss of more than -2.04g/L had a greater risk of death (p<0.05).

Interpretation: From initial evidence, we have shown absolute lung density change as a potential outcome for emphysema modifying therapies in AATD rather than annual density change, with an MCID of -2.04g/L.

肺气肿进展的最小临床重要差异的提出和验证。
目的:肺气肿的严重程度可以通过CT扫描的肺密度来衡量,在α -1抗胰蛋白酶缺乏症(AATD)中,这一指标已被用作疾病改善治疗(即增强治疗)试验的主要指标。然而,肺密度变化的最小临床重要差异(MCID)尚不清楚;本研究旨在推导和验证AATD密度值的MCIDs。方法:采用分布法和锚定密度对FEV1的影响,得出MCID的均值和95%置信区间。系统回顾了CT密度测量和AATD治疗的数据,得出了肺密度的绝对变化和年变化。使用这些方法产生的潜在MCID范围,选择一个值用于对照伯明翰(英国)AATD队列的死亡率、肺功能和健康状况进行验证,并使用回归来调整混杂因素。结果:锚定法和分布法产生的MCID可能为-1.87 g/L/年(范围为-1.53至-2.20)。组间差异最大的是-2.2g/L/年,肺损失越大的个体FEV1下降越大。肺绝对密度变化的MCID可能为-2.04g/L(范围为-1.83至-2.30),肺功能也存在差异(解释:从最初的证据来看,我们已经表明肺绝对密度变化是AATD肺气肿修饰治疗的潜在结果,而年密度变化的MCID为-2.04g/L。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
45
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信