[Sustainability in practices and thought processes in prehospital emergency medicine : A survey of emergency service personnel].

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Julia Johanna Grannemann, Martin Deicke, André Kobiella, Eugen Latka, Bernd Strickmann, Gerrit Jansen
{"title":"[Sustainability in practices and thought processes in prehospital emergency medicine : A survey of emergency service personnel].","authors":"Julia Johanna Grannemann, Martin Deicke, André Kobiella, Eugen Latka, Bernd Strickmann, Gerrit Jansen","doi":"10.1007/s00063-024-01246-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sustainability in emergency medicine constitutes a nascent area of inquiry that has thus far attracted limited scholarly attention; however, it is experiencing burgeoning interest. To date, there are no empirical studies examining how emergency medical personnel evaluate the concept of sustainability or what specific aspects and propositions they may have regarding the topic.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The primary objective of this study was to investigate the perspectives of emergency medical employees concerning the concept of sustainability in prehospital emergency medicine.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>An online survey comprising 23 questions was administered. Participation was voluntary and conducted anonymously.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 462 participants participated in the survey, predominantly consisting of paramedics (74% male, 26% female), aged between 25 and 44. Approximately 70% of respondents expressed that they had contemplated the potential for enhancing sustainability within emergency medicine. Participants deemed the separation of packaging as a practical measure, particularly concerning syringes, cannulas and infusion systems. The estimated incidence of contamination for these materials is less than 50%. Nevertheless, factors such as insufficient time, space or motivation are cited as barriers to effective waste separation. Packaging, especially for patient blankets, cervical collars and infection protection gowns, is identified as potentially superfluous. Participants indicated that the majority of waste is attributed to plastic packaging and disposable gloves.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings of this study indicate that emergency medicine employees are aware of sustainability issues. Participants identified pragmatic avenues for waste separation and reduction in prehospital patient care, while also acknowledging potential challenges. Further research is needed to elucidate sustainability opportunities within prehospital emergency medicine.</p>","PeriodicalId":49019,"journal":{"name":"Medizinische Klinik-Intensivmedizin Und Notfallmedizin","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medizinische Klinik-Intensivmedizin Und Notfallmedizin","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00063-024-01246-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Sustainability in emergency medicine constitutes a nascent area of inquiry that has thus far attracted limited scholarly attention; however, it is experiencing burgeoning interest. To date, there are no empirical studies examining how emergency medical personnel evaluate the concept of sustainability or what specific aspects and propositions they may have regarding the topic.

Objectives: The primary objective of this study was to investigate the perspectives of emergency medical employees concerning the concept of sustainability in prehospital emergency medicine.

Materials and methods: An online survey comprising 23 questions was administered. Participation was voluntary and conducted anonymously.

Results: A total of 462 participants participated in the survey, predominantly consisting of paramedics (74% male, 26% female), aged between 25 and 44. Approximately 70% of respondents expressed that they had contemplated the potential for enhancing sustainability within emergency medicine. Participants deemed the separation of packaging as a practical measure, particularly concerning syringes, cannulas and infusion systems. The estimated incidence of contamination for these materials is less than 50%. Nevertheless, factors such as insufficient time, space or motivation are cited as barriers to effective waste separation. Packaging, especially for patient blankets, cervical collars and infection protection gowns, is identified as potentially superfluous. Participants indicated that the majority of waste is attributed to plastic packaging and disposable gloves.

Conclusion: The findings of this study indicate that emergency medicine employees are aware of sustainability issues. Participants identified pragmatic avenues for waste separation and reduction in prehospital patient care, while also acknowledging potential challenges. Further research is needed to elucidate sustainability opportunities within prehospital emergency medicine.

[院前急救医学实践和思维过程的可持续性:对急救人员的调查]。
背景:急诊医学的可持续性构成了一个新兴的研究领域,迄今为止吸引了有限的学术关注;然而,它正经历着蓬勃发展的兴趣。迄今为止,还没有实证研究检查急救医务人员如何评估可持续性的概念,或者他们可能对该主题有哪些具体方面和主张。目的:本研究的主要目的是探讨急诊医务人员对院前急诊医学可持续性概念的看法。资料与方法:采用23个问题的在线调查。参与是自愿和匿名进行的。结果:共有462名参与者参与了调查,主要由护理人员组成(男性74%,女性26%),年龄在25至44岁之间。大约70%的答复者表示,他们已经考虑了加强急诊医学可持续性的潜力。与会者认为包装分离是一项切实可行的措施,特别是涉及注射器、套管和输液系统。估计这些材料的污染发生率低于50%。然而,时间、空间或动机不足等因素被认为是有效废物分类的障碍。包装,特别是病人毛毯、颈领和感染防护服,被认为可能是多余的。与会者指出,大部分废物来自塑料包装和一次性手套。结论:本研究结果显示急诊科员工意识到可持续性问题。与会者确定了在院前病人护理中进行废物分类和减少废物的务实途径,同时也承认了潜在的挑战。需要进一步的研究来阐明院前急诊医学的可持续性机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
93
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Medizinische Klinik – Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin is an internationally respected interdisciplinary journal. It is intended for physicians, nurses, respiratory and physical therapists active in intensive care and accident/emergency units, but also for internists, anesthesiologists, surgeons, neurologists, and pediatricians with special interest in intensive care medicine. Comprehensive reviews describe the most recent advances in the field of internal medicine with special focus on intensive care problems. Freely submitted original articles present important studies in this discipline and promote scientific exchange, while articles in the category Photo essay feature interesting cases and aim at optimizing diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. In the rubric journal club well-respected experts comment on outstanding international publications. Review articles under the rubric "Continuing Medical Education" present verified results of scientific research and their integration into daily practice. The rubrics "Nursing practice" and "Physical therapy" round out the information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信