Endoscopic Spine Surgery: A French National Survey on Practices, Motivations, and Challenges.

IF 1.7 Q2 SURGERY
Xavier Castel, Marc Szadkowski, Henri d'Astorg
{"title":"Endoscopic Spine Surgery: A French National Survey on Practices, Motivations, and Challenges.","authors":"Xavier Castel, Marc Szadkowski, Henri d'Astorg","doi":"10.14444/8722","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endoscopic spine surgery is a minimally invasive approach that offers several advantages over the traditional open approach, including less tissue trauma, faster recovery, and lower rates of complications. However, the learning curve and the requirement of separate equipment limits the acceptability of this technique for many spine surgeons. Using a short survey, the authors sought to report the current status regarding the use of endoscopy among French spine surgeons and to identify the barriers faced by spine surgeons to adopting endoscopy into their practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey was conducted in which a predefined questionnaire was sent as a Google form to 522 members of the Societe Francaise de Chirurgie du Rachisspine. Respondents were asked to respond within 3 months, with reminders sent regularly to nonresponders. Responses were collected and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among all 123 survey respondents, 39 practiced endoscopy and 84 did not practice endoscopy. Most of the surgeons acquired skills by visiting other surgeons (74.4%) or attending cadaver-based workshops (56.4%). A substantial portion of respondents were in between 1 and 3 years of experience (48.7%) and performed 5 to 10 endoscopic procedures per month(30.8%). Although 92.1% of respondents observed better outcomes in their patients with endoscopy, lack of training (26%) and high equipment cost (13.8%) were the most limiting factors reported by surgeons.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this survey contribute to the existing literature and highlight the current trends of endoscopic spine surgery in France. Although the benefits of minimally invasive spine surgery are well documented and were confirmed by surgeons in this survey, lack of training and cost of equipment are major barriers that need to be controlled to expand the adoption of this technique.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Understanding the factors influencing the adoption of endoscopic spine surgery in France provides valuable insights for surgeons and educators. By identifying key barriers and motivations, this study may help guide strategies for improving training, accessibility, and implementation of endoscopic techniques in spinal surgery.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: 4: </strong></p>","PeriodicalId":38486,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Spine Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"173-178"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Spine Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14444/8722","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Endoscopic spine surgery is a minimally invasive approach that offers several advantages over the traditional open approach, including less tissue trauma, faster recovery, and lower rates of complications. However, the learning curve and the requirement of separate equipment limits the acceptability of this technique for many spine surgeons. Using a short survey, the authors sought to report the current status regarding the use of endoscopy among French spine surgeons and to identify the barriers faced by spine surgeons to adopting endoscopy into their practice.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted in which a predefined questionnaire was sent as a Google form to 522 members of the Societe Francaise de Chirurgie du Rachisspine. Respondents were asked to respond within 3 months, with reminders sent regularly to nonresponders. Responses were collected and analyzed.

Results: Among all 123 survey respondents, 39 practiced endoscopy and 84 did not practice endoscopy. Most of the surgeons acquired skills by visiting other surgeons (74.4%) or attending cadaver-based workshops (56.4%). A substantial portion of respondents were in between 1 and 3 years of experience (48.7%) and performed 5 to 10 endoscopic procedures per month(30.8%). Although 92.1% of respondents observed better outcomes in their patients with endoscopy, lack of training (26%) and high equipment cost (13.8%) were the most limiting factors reported by surgeons.

Conclusion: The results of this survey contribute to the existing literature and highlight the current trends of endoscopic spine surgery in France. Although the benefits of minimally invasive spine surgery are well documented and were confirmed by surgeons in this survey, lack of training and cost of equipment are major barriers that need to be controlled to expand the adoption of this technique.

Clinical relevance: Understanding the factors influencing the adoption of endoscopic spine surgery in France provides valuable insights for surgeons and educators. By identifying key barriers and motivations, this study may help guide strategies for improving training, accessibility, and implementation of endoscopic techniques in spinal surgery.

Level of evidence: 4:

内窥镜脊柱外科:一项关于实践、动机和挑战的法国全国调查。
背景:内窥镜脊柱手术是一种微创入路,与传统的开放入路相比,它有几个优点,包括更少的组织创伤、更快的恢复和更低的并发症发生率。然而,学习曲线和对单独设备的要求限制了许多脊柱外科医生接受这项技术。通过一项简短的调查,作者试图报告法国脊柱外科医生使用内窥镜的现状,并确定脊柱外科医生在实践中采用内窥镜所面临的障碍。方法:采用横断面调查的方法,以谷歌形式向522名法国兴业银行的成员发送预先确定的问卷。受访者被要求在3个月内做出回应,并定期向没有回应的人发送提醒。收集并分析反馈。结果:123名调查对象中,39人进行内窥镜检查,84人未进行内窥镜检查。大多数外科医生通过拜访其他外科医生(74.4%)或参加以尸体为基础的讲习班(56.4%)获得技能。相当一部分受访者有1至3年的经验(48.7%),每月进行5至10次内窥镜手术(30.8%)。尽管92.1%的受访者认为内窥镜检查患者的预后较好,但缺乏培训(26%)和设备成本高(13.8%)是外科医生报告的最大限制因素。结论:本调查的结果有助于现有文献,并突出了法国内窥镜脊柱手术的当前趋势。尽管微创脊柱手术的好处有充分的文献记载,并且在本次调查中得到了外科医生的证实,但缺乏培训和设备成本是需要控制的主要障碍,以扩大该技术的采用。临床相关性:了解影响法国采用内窥镜脊柱手术的因素为外科医生和教育工作者提供了有价值的见解。通过确定关键障碍和动机,本研究可能有助于指导脊柱手术中改进内窥镜技术的培训、可及性和实施策略。证据等级:4;
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
162
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Spine Surgery is the official scientific journal of ISASS, the International Intradiscal Therapy Society, the Pittsburgh Spine Summit, and the Büttner-Janz Spinefoundation, and is an official partner of the Southern Neurosurgical Society. The goal of the International Journal of Spine Surgery is to promote and disseminate online the most up-to-date scientific and clinical research into innovations in motion preservation and new spinal surgery technology, including basic science, biologics, and tissue engineering. The Journal is dedicated to educating spine surgeons worldwide by reporting on the scientific basis, indications, surgical techniques, complications, outcomes, and follow-up data for promising spinal procedures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信