Incidence of failure-to-rescue after coronary artery bypass grafting: a multicenter observational study from the REPLICCAR II registry in Brazil.

IF 2.6 Q1 SURGERY
Gabrielle Barbosa Borgomoni, Roger Daglius Dias, Pedro Gabriel Melo de Barros E Silva, Marcelo Arruda Nakazone, Marco Antonio Praça de Oliveira, Valquíria Pelisser Campagnucci, Marcos Gradim Tiveron, Luís Augusto Ferreira Lisboa, Ludhmila Abrahão Hajjar, Jorge Passamani Zubelli, Fábio Biscegli Jatene, Omar Asdrúbal Vilca Mejia
{"title":"Incidence of failure-to-rescue after coronary artery bypass grafting: a multicenter observational study from the REPLICCAR II registry in Brazil.","authors":"Gabrielle Barbosa Borgomoni, Roger Daglius Dias, Pedro Gabriel Melo de Barros E Silva, Marcelo Arruda Nakazone, Marco Antonio Praça de Oliveira, Valquíria Pelisser Campagnucci, Marcos Gradim Tiveron, Luís Augusto Ferreira Lisboa, Ludhmila Abrahão Hajjar, Jorge Passamani Zubelli, Fábio Biscegli Jatene, Omar Asdrúbal Vilca Mejia","doi":"10.1186/s13037-024-00417-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Failure-to-rescue refers to the rate of failure amongst healthcare teams in reversing complications that occur during a patient's hospitalization. This study aimed to investigate the failure-to-rescue rate following coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional cohort study of the multicenter database \"Registro Paulista de Cirurgia Cardiovascular II\" (REPLICCAR II), which includes data from nine reference centers for cardiac surgery in São Paulo State. The study population included patients > 18 years of age who had undergone primary and isolated CABG surgery between 2017 and 2019 in Brazil. The outcome measured was failure-to-rescue (including death and the development of postoperative complications: prolonged ventilation time, stroke, reoperation, and kidney injury). The study used the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) risk score to calculate the expected complication rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of the 3964 patients, 439 developed one or more of the analyzed complications, and out of those, 94 died (2.37% of the full sample). The standardized mortality ratio (SMR) for patients who developed one complication was 8.84% (10.7%/1.21%), whereas those with two combinations of complications had an SMR of 32.34% (53.68%/1.66%) and three complications had an SMR of 42.02% (50%/1.19%). However, patients who progressed without the analyzed complications had an SMR of 0.95% (0.74%/0.80%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The REPLICCAR II database revealed a failure-to-rescue rate of 21.41% (94/439), and the SMR increased progressively according to the greater number of complications. Our findings emphasize the need to measure the impact of early diagnosis and effective hospital team response by parameterizing the risk of expected death after severe complications.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The REPLICCAR Registry and The Statewide Quality Improvement Initiative, ID NCT05363696.</p>","PeriodicalId":46782,"journal":{"name":"Patient Safety in Surgery","volume":"19 1","pages":"6"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11818038/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patient Safety in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13037-024-00417-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Failure-to-rescue refers to the rate of failure amongst healthcare teams in reversing complications that occur during a patient's hospitalization. This study aimed to investigate the failure-to-rescue rate following coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).

Methods: Cross-sectional cohort study of the multicenter database "Registro Paulista de Cirurgia Cardiovascular II" (REPLICCAR II), which includes data from nine reference centers for cardiac surgery in São Paulo State. The study population included patients > 18 years of age who had undergone primary and isolated CABG surgery between 2017 and 2019 in Brazil. The outcome measured was failure-to-rescue (including death and the development of postoperative complications: prolonged ventilation time, stroke, reoperation, and kidney injury). The study used the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) risk score to calculate the expected complication rates.

Results: Out of the 3964 patients, 439 developed one or more of the analyzed complications, and out of those, 94 died (2.37% of the full sample). The standardized mortality ratio (SMR) for patients who developed one complication was 8.84% (10.7%/1.21%), whereas those with two combinations of complications had an SMR of 32.34% (53.68%/1.66%) and three complications had an SMR of 42.02% (50%/1.19%). However, patients who progressed without the analyzed complications had an SMR of 0.95% (0.74%/0.80%).

Conclusion: The REPLICCAR II database revealed a failure-to-rescue rate of 21.41% (94/439), and the SMR increased progressively according to the greater number of complications. Our findings emphasize the need to measure the impact of early diagnosis and effective hospital team response by parameterizing the risk of expected death after severe complications.

Trial registration: The REPLICCAR Registry and The Statewide Quality Improvement Initiative, ID NCT05363696.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
8.10%
发文量
37
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信