Higher Levels of Postoperative Mobility and Activity as Measured by the AM-PAC 6 Clicks Instrument Are Associated with Improved Outcomes after Lumbar Fusion.

IF 1.2 Q3 SURGERY
Spine Surgery and Related Research Pub Date : 2024-06-10 eCollection Date: 2025-01-27 DOI:10.22603/ssrr.2024-0047
Parimal Rana, Jane C Brennan, Andrea H Johnson, Justin J Turcotte, Chad M Patton
{"title":"Higher Levels of Postoperative Mobility and Activity as Measured by the AM-PAC 6 Clicks Instrument Are Associated with Improved Outcomes after Lumbar Fusion.","authors":"Parimal Rana, Jane C Brennan, Andrea H Johnson, Justin J Turcotte, Chad M Patton","doi":"10.22603/ssrr.2024-0047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Previous studies have shown that early patient mobility and activity can improve patient outcomes after lumbar fusion procedures. This study aimed to explore the relationship between patient mobility and activity, measured by the Activity Measure for Post-acute Care (AM-PAC) \"6-Clicks\" assessment and postoperative outcomes in lumbar fusion patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of 306 lumbar fusions (105 with 6-Clicks mobility and 289 with 6-Clicks activity scores) was conducted. Statistical analyses were performed to evaluate the relationship between 6-Clicks scores and postoperative outcomes, such as prolonged length of stay (LOS), nonhome discharge, 30-day emergency department (ED) returns and readmissions, and minimal clinically important difference (MCID) achievement on the PROMIS-PF instrument at 3-12 months postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After controlling for age, body mass index, sex, race, number of levels, and preoperative PROMIS-PF, higher 6-Clicks mobility scores decreased the likelihood of 3+ day LOS (OR: 0.72; p=0.010), non-home discharge (OR: 0.68; p<0.001), and 30-day ED return (OR: 0.78; p=0.022) and increased the likelihood of PROMIS MCID achievement (OR: 1.28; p=0.004). The odds of LOS 3+ days, non-home discharge, and ED return for each one-point increase in mobility scores all decreased by 28%, 32%, and 22%, respectively, while the odds of achieving PROMIS MCID for every one-point increase in mobility increased by 28%. After risk adjustment, higher 6-Clicks activity scores were protective against 3+ day LOS (OR: 0.78; p<0.001) and non-home discharge (OR: 0.69; p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The AM-PAC 6-Clicks mobility and activity scores hold value as early indicators of prolonged LOS and nonhome discharge, while mobility scores may help identify patients who are at risk for ED returns and who fail to experience clinically significant improvement in physical function. These tools may be used to identify patients requiring additional resources and can inform discussions surrounding patient expectations.</p>","PeriodicalId":22253,"journal":{"name":"Spine Surgery and Related Research","volume":"9 1","pages":"71-77"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11808243/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine Surgery and Related Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22603/ssrr.2024-0047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Previous studies have shown that early patient mobility and activity can improve patient outcomes after lumbar fusion procedures. This study aimed to explore the relationship between patient mobility and activity, measured by the Activity Measure for Post-acute Care (AM-PAC) "6-Clicks" assessment and postoperative outcomes in lumbar fusion patients.

Methods: A retrospective review of 306 lumbar fusions (105 with 6-Clicks mobility and 289 with 6-Clicks activity scores) was conducted. Statistical analyses were performed to evaluate the relationship between 6-Clicks scores and postoperative outcomes, such as prolonged length of stay (LOS), nonhome discharge, 30-day emergency department (ED) returns and readmissions, and minimal clinically important difference (MCID) achievement on the PROMIS-PF instrument at 3-12 months postoperatively.

Results: After controlling for age, body mass index, sex, race, number of levels, and preoperative PROMIS-PF, higher 6-Clicks mobility scores decreased the likelihood of 3+ day LOS (OR: 0.72; p=0.010), non-home discharge (OR: 0.68; p<0.001), and 30-day ED return (OR: 0.78; p=0.022) and increased the likelihood of PROMIS MCID achievement (OR: 1.28; p=0.004). The odds of LOS 3+ days, non-home discharge, and ED return for each one-point increase in mobility scores all decreased by 28%, 32%, and 22%, respectively, while the odds of achieving PROMIS MCID for every one-point increase in mobility increased by 28%. After risk adjustment, higher 6-Clicks activity scores were protective against 3+ day LOS (OR: 0.78; p<0.001) and non-home discharge (OR: 0.69; p<0.001).

Conclusions: The AM-PAC 6-Clicks mobility and activity scores hold value as early indicators of prolonged LOS and nonhome discharge, while mobility scores may help identify patients who are at risk for ED returns and who fail to experience clinically significant improvement in physical function. These tools may be used to identify patients requiring additional resources and can inform discussions surrounding patient expectations.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信