External Evaluation of Longitudinal Population Pharmacokinetic Models of Vancomycin in Patients With Osteoarticular Infections.

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Van Dong Nguyen, Alice Côté, Amélie Marsot
{"title":"External Evaluation of Longitudinal Population Pharmacokinetic Models of Vancomycin in Patients With Osteoarticular Infections.","authors":"Van Dong Nguyen, Alice Côté, Amélie Marsot","doi":"10.1097/FTD.0000000000001303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Osteoarticular infections pose a challenge for therapeutic drug monitoring of vancomycin because they often require prolonged treatment. Given the extensive renal elimination of vancomycin, its pharmacokinetic properties are difficult to predict in the later stages of treatment because the risk of nephrotoxicity increases with the duration of treatment. In this study, published longitudinal population pharmacokinetic (popPK) models were externally evaluated in a cohort of patients with osteoarticular infections.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature search was performed in PubMed/EMBASE and published reviews. The predictive performance of the selected models was assessed through prediction- and simulation-based diagnostics using NONMEM software. Data were collected during both the retrospective and prospective phases, during which prospectively recruited patients provided additional vancomycin concentrations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The external validation dataset comprised 525 vancomycin concentrations obtained from 73 patients treated for osteoarticular infections at Montréal General Hospital. Two published popPK models that provided different approaches for integrating a longitudinal structure were identified. Both failed to meet the clinically acceptable threshold of imprecision in population predictions. The weighted median absolute prediction error ranged from 34.9% to 48.3% before re-estimation of model parameters and from 33.5% to 35.2% after re-estimation. The re-estimated models tended to underpredict vancomycin concentrations in the later stages of treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The 2 evaluated models showed poor predictive performance in our local study population. Further studies should explore new strategies to incorporate a longitudinal component and consider other relevant clinical covariates to develop improved longitudinal popPK models for vancomycin.</p>","PeriodicalId":23052,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Drug Monitoring","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Drug Monitoring","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/FTD.0000000000001303","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Osteoarticular infections pose a challenge for therapeutic drug monitoring of vancomycin because they often require prolonged treatment. Given the extensive renal elimination of vancomycin, its pharmacokinetic properties are difficult to predict in the later stages of treatment because the risk of nephrotoxicity increases with the duration of treatment. In this study, published longitudinal population pharmacokinetic (popPK) models were externally evaluated in a cohort of patients with osteoarticular infections.

Methods: A literature search was performed in PubMed/EMBASE and published reviews. The predictive performance of the selected models was assessed through prediction- and simulation-based diagnostics using NONMEM software. Data were collected during both the retrospective and prospective phases, during which prospectively recruited patients provided additional vancomycin concentrations.

Results: The external validation dataset comprised 525 vancomycin concentrations obtained from 73 patients treated for osteoarticular infections at Montréal General Hospital. Two published popPK models that provided different approaches for integrating a longitudinal structure were identified. Both failed to meet the clinically acceptable threshold of imprecision in population predictions. The weighted median absolute prediction error ranged from 34.9% to 48.3% before re-estimation of model parameters and from 33.5% to 35.2% after re-estimation. The re-estimated models tended to underpredict vancomycin concentrations in the later stages of treatment.

Conclusions: The 2 evaluated models showed poor predictive performance in our local study population. Further studies should explore new strategies to incorporate a longitudinal component and consider other relevant clinical covariates to develop improved longitudinal popPK models for vancomycin.

万古霉素骨关节感染患者纵向群体药代动力学模型的外部评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring 医学-毒理学
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
8.00%
发文量
213
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Drug Monitoring is a peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary journal directed to an audience of pharmacologists, clinical chemists, laboratorians, pharmacists, drug researchers and toxicologists. It fosters the exchange of knowledge among the various disciplines–clinical pharmacology, pathology, toxicology, analytical chemistry–that share a common interest in Therapeutic Drug Monitoring. The journal presents studies detailing the various factors that affect the rate and extent drugs are absorbed, metabolized, and excreted. Regular features include review articles on specific classes of drugs, original articles, case reports, technical notes, and continuing education articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信