Vasopressin in traumatic hemorrhagic shock.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Current Opinion in Anesthesiology Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-20 DOI:10.1097/ACO.0000000000001456
Wolfgang G Voelckel
{"title":"Vasopressin in traumatic hemorrhagic shock.","authors":"Wolfgang G Voelckel","doi":"10.1097/ACO.0000000000001456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Hemorrhage and subsequent development of therapy refractory shock are the major cause of death in potentially salvageable trauma victims. Recent scientific work recognizes that there is an urgent need to develop new life-support strategies. From a variety of interventions and drugs with the potential to prolong the compensation phase or to reverse the decompensation phase of shock, arginine vasopressin (AVP) is one of the most promising and best evaluated drugs. Nonetheless, the efficacy of AVP administration in hemorrhagic shock is still to be proven. Thus, this umbrella review summarizes the current evidence of AVP in hemorrhagic shock.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Fifteen short reviews, narrative reviews, systematic reviews and meta-analysis addressing AVP in traumatic hemorrhagic shock were identified and included in this umbrella review. There is robust evidence deriving form 23 animal studies that AVP administration is effective in hemorrhagic shock, resulting in hemodynamic stabilization and improved survival. This observation is supported by six case reports but not confirmed by two retrospective observational studies and two randomized control trials.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>In uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock, arginine vasopressin might be considered as a therapy of last resort in shock patients not responding to conventional therapy. Further research is needed to determine the potential benefits and optimal dosage/timing of vasopressin use in hemorrhagic shock.</p>","PeriodicalId":50609,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":"81-92"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ACO.0000000000001456","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: Hemorrhage and subsequent development of therapy refractory shock are the major cause of death in potentially salvageable trauma victims. Recent scientific work recognizes that there is an urgent need to develop new life-support strategies. From a variety of interventions and drugs with the potential to prolong the compensation phase or to reverse the decompensation phase of shock, arginine vasopressin (AVP) is one of the most promising and best evaluated drugs. Nonetheless, the efficacy of AVP administration in hemorrhagic shock is still to be proven. Thus, this umbrella review summarizes the current evidence of AVP in hemorrhagic shock.

Recent findings: Fifteen short reviews, narrative reviews, systematic reviews and meta-analysis addressing AVP in traumatic hemorrhagic shock were identified and included in this umbrella review. There is robust evidence deriving form 23 animal studies that AVP administration is effective in hemorrhagic shock, resulting in hemodynamic stabilization and improved survival. This observation is supported by six case reports but not confirmed by two retrospective observational studies and two randomized control trials.

Summary: In uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock, arginine vasopressin might be considered as a therapy of last resort in shock patients not responding to conventional therapy. Further research is needed to determine the potential benefits and optimal dosage/timing of vasopressin use in hemorrhagic shock.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.00%
发文量
207
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​​​Published bimonthly and offering a unique and wide ranging perspective on the key developments in the field, each issue of Current Opinion in Anesthesiology features hand-picked review articles from our team of expert editors. With fifteen disciplines published across the year – including cardiovascular anesthesiology, neuroanesthesia and pain medicine – every issue also contains annotated references detailing the merits of the most important papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信