Associations Between End-Stage ALS Care and Specialty Palliative Care: A Hypothesis-Generating Study.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Muscle & Nerve Pub Date : 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1002/mus.28370
Christi M Lero, Annabelle Yang, Elyse Everett, Kyle A Pitzer, Kelly McCoy Gross, Karla T Washington
{"title":"Associations Between End-Stage ALS Care and Specialty Palliative Care: A Hypothesis-Generating Study.","authors":"Christi M Lero, Annabelle Yang, Elyse Everett, Kyle A Pitzer, Kelly McCoy Gross, Karla T Washington","doi":"10.1002/mus.28370","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction/aims: </strong>Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) care is typically delivered via a multidisciplinary approach that may include specialty palliative care (SPC). Opportunities for SPC to enhance ALS care have been identified; however, investigation of these proposed benefits is scant. In this exploratory study, investigators examined associations between receipt of SPC and variables particularly relevant to end-stage ALS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Researchers reviewed electronic health records for all patients with ALS who received standard ALS care from one Midwestern US academic medical center and died between January 1, 2020, and June 30, 2022 (N = 156). Receipt of SPC, duration of illness, hospice enrollment and length of service, report of a healthcare proxy, documentation of a healthcare proxy, participation in goals of care conversations, and location of death were examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients who received SPC (59%), had lower mean forced vital capacity (FVC) (p < 0.05), and more often used respiratory support (p < 0.001), participated in goals of care conversations (p < 0.001), reported a healthcare proxy (p < 0.01), and enrolled in hospice (p < 0.001) than patients who received standard care alone. No differences between groups were found in duration of illness (mean = 51.7 months), use of assistive feeding, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R) scores (mean = 32.1), documentation of a healthcare proxy, length of hospice stay (mean = 47.3 days), or location of death.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Clinical characteristics and end-of-life outcome differences between groups support further investigation of the proposed benefits of SPC regarding hospice enrollment, report of healthcare proxies, and documented goals of care conversations.</p>","PeriodicalId":18968,"journal":{"name":"Muscle & Nerve","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Muscle & Nerve","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.28370","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction/aims: Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) care is typically delivered via a multidisciplinary approach that may include specialty palliative care (SPC). Opportunities for SPC to enhance ALS care have been identified; however, investigation of these proposed benefits is scant. In this exploratory study, investigators examined associations between receipt of SPC and variables particularly relevant to end-stage ALS.

Methods: Researchers reviewed electronic health records for all patients with ALS who received standard ALS care from one Midwestern US academic medical center and died between January 1, 2020, and June 30, 2022 (N = 156). Receipt of SPC, duration of illness, hospice enrollment and length of service, report of a healthcare proxy, documentation of a healthcare proxy, participation in goals of care conversations, and location of death were examined.

Results: Patients who received SPC (59%), had lower mean forced vital capacity (FVC) (p < 0.05), and more often used respiratory support (p < 0.001), participated in goals of care conversations (p < 0.001), reported a healthcare proxy (p < 0.01), and enrolled in hospice (p < 0.001) than patients who received standard care alone. No differences between groups were found in duration of illness (mean = 51.7 months), use of assistive feeding, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R) scores (mean = 32.1), documentation of a healthcare proxy, length of hospice stay (mean = 47.3 days), or location of death.

Discussion: Clinical characteristics and end-of-life outcome differences between groups support further investigation of the proposed benefits of SPC regarding hospice enrollment, report of healthcare proxies, and documented goals of care conversations.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Muscle & Nerve
Muscle & Nerve 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
287
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Muscle & Nerve is an international and interdisciplinary publication of original contributions, in both health and disease, concerning studies of the muscle, the neuromuscular junction, the peripheral motor, sensory and autonomic neurons, and the central nervous system where the behavior of the peripheral nervous system is clarified. Appearing monthly, Muscle & Nerve publishes clinical studies and clinically relevant research reports in the fields of anatomy, biochemistry, cell biology, electrophysiology and electrodiagnosis, epidemiology, genetics, immunology, pathology, pharmacology, physiology, toxicology, and virology. The Journal welcomes articles and reports on basic clinical electrophysiology and electrodiagnosis. We expedite some papers dealing with timely topics to keep up with the fast-moving pace of science, based on the referees'' recommendation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信