A Program to Reduce Emergency Department Transfers and Build Long-Term Care Home Capacity: A Mixed-Methods Study.

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Geetha Mukerji, Leahora Rotteau, Joanne Goldman, Amol A Verma, Kaveh G Shojania, Fahad Razak, Sid Feldman, Patricia Rios, Laura Pus, Pauline Pariser, Tara O'Brien, Andrea L Moser, Brian M Wong
{"title":"A Program to Reduce Emergency Department Transfers and Build Long-Term Care Home Capacity: A Mixed-Methods Study.","authors":"Geetha Mukerji, Leahora Rotteau, Joanne Goldman, Amol A Verma, Kaveh G Shojania, Fahad Razak, Sid Feldman, Patricia Rios, Laura Pus, Pauline Pariser, Tara O'Brien, Andrea L Moser, Brian M Wong","doi":"10.1016/j.jamda.2025.105488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Transfers to acute care hospitals expose long-term care residents to potential harm. We implemented Long-Term Care Plus (LTC+) at the outset of the COVID-19 pandemic to reduce emergency department (ED) transfers and improve access to urgent medical services by providing virtual specialist consultation, system navigation, and diagnostic and laboratory testing to 54 long-term care homes (LTCHs).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This mixed-methods study aimed to determine if LTC+ led to a decrease in avoidable acute care transfers and to explore participants' perceptions and contextual factors influencing uptake.</p><p><strong>Setting and participants: </strong>LTC+ was implemented across 54 LTCHs and 3 hospital hubs in Toronto, Canada.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Statistical process control charts were created to detect changes in ED transfer rates, stratifying data into high- and low-uptake LTCHs to evaluate the effect of LTC+ on ED transfer rates across 54 LTCHs. Semistructured interviews were conducted with health care providers, administrators, residents, and caregivers across 6 LTCHs and 3 hospital hubs and analyzed thematically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 9658 ED transfers during the study period (April 2020 to March 2022), of which 3860 (40.0%) did not require admission. LTC+ delivered 534 virtual consultations, with 5 LTCHs accounting for 59% of program use. Compared with baseline (January 2019 to February 2020), transfer rates decreased by 40%, with no difference seen between LTCHs with high vs low uptake. Factors influencing uptake include program awareness, motivation, alignment of LTCH resources and program services, and commitment to ED avoidance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and implications: </strong>The LTC+ program did not reduce ED transfers beyond secular trends attributable to the broader effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. Participants that used LTC+ identified important benefits that extended beyond ED avoidance including building self-efficacy and capacity in LTCHs to provide client-centered care with cross-sectoral collaboration. Refinements to the LTC+ program design and delivery and structural changes are needed to increase impact.</p>","PeriodicalId":17180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","volume":" ","pages":"105488"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2025.105488","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Transfers to acute care hospitals expose long-term care residents to potential harm. We implemented Long-Term Care Plus (LTC+) at the outset of the COVID-19 pandemic to reduce emergency department (ED) transfers and improve access to urgent medical services by providing virtual specialist consultation, system navigation, and diagnostic and laboratory testing to 54 long-term care homes (LTCHs).

Design: This mixed-methods study aimed to determine if LTC+ led to a decrease in avoidable acute care transfers and to explore participants' perceptions and contextual factors influencing uptake.

Setting and participants: LTC+ was implemented across 54 LTCHs and 3 hospital hubs in Toronto, Canada.

Methods: Statistical process control charts were created to detect changes in ED transfer rates, stratifying data into high- and low-uptake LTCHs to evaluate the effect of LTC+ on ED transfer rates across 54 LTCHs. Semistructured interviews were conducted with health care providers, administrators, residents, and caregivers across 6 LTCHs and 3 hospital hubs and analyzed thematically.

Results: There were 9658 ED transfers during the study period (April 2020 to March 2022), of which 3860 (40.0%) did not require admission. LTC+ delivered 534 virtual consultations, with 5 LTCHs accounting for 59% of program use. Compared with baseline (January 2019 to February 2020), transfer rates decreased by 40%, with no difference seen between LTCHs with high vs low uptake. Factors influencing uptake include program awareness, motivation, alignment of LTCH resources and program services, and commitment to ED avoidance.

Conclusions and implications: The LTC+ program did not reduce ED transfers beyond secular trends attributable to the broader effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. Participants that used LTC+ identified important benefits that extended beyond ED avoidance including building self-efficacy and capacity in LTCHs to provide client-centered care with cross-sectoral collaboration. Refinements to the LTC+ program design and delivery and structural changes are needed to increase impact.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
6.60%
发文量
472
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: JAMDA, the official journal of AMDA - The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine, is a leading peer-reviewed publication that offers practical information and research geared towards healthcare professionals in the post-acute and long-term care fields. It is also a valuable resource for policy-makers, organizational leaders, educators, and advocates. The journal provides essential information for various healthcare professionals such as medical directors, attending physicians, nurses, consultant pharmacists, geriatric psychiatrists, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, physical and occupational therapists, social workers, and others involved in providing, overseeing, and promoting quality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信