Applying the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS) within Root Cause Analysis (RCA) to Prevent Medical Errors and Enhancing Patient Safety Culture: Insights from a Medical Center.
{"title":"Applying the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS) within Root Cause Analysis (RCA) to Prevent Medical Errors and Enhancing Patient Safety Culture: Insights from a Medical Center.","authors":"Jiun-Yih Lee, Chien-Hsien Huang, Yi-An Sie, Pei-Ching Yang, Chun-Cheng Su, Jui-Ting Chang","doi":"10.1093/intqhc/mzaf009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Enhancing patient safety and minimizing medical errors are crucial in healthcare. While Root Cause Analysis (RCA) is commonly used to investigate adverse events, its lack of human factors integration limit its effectiveness. The Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS), adapted from aviation to healthcare, systematically identifies human and organizational factors. However, the integration of HFACS into RCA and the impact of HFACS-RCA implementation remain underexplored. Therefore, this study aims to: provide a practical case of HFACS integration into RCA and explore the effects of HFACS-RCA implementation.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>This study integrates HFACS into the RCA process at a medical center in Taiwan, examining an incident involving unsterilized instruments distributed from the Central Sterile Supply Room (CSR) to the ICU. This study employed a before-and-after study design to examine the impact of the HFACS-RCA intervention. The primary outcome measures were the changes in scores across the eight dimensions of the Taiwan Patient Safety Culture Survey (TPSC) before and after the intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A one-year follow-up of the CSR case showed no similar incidents. HFACS-RCA significantly improved TPSC scores in unit safety climate (p=0.05), feelings towards management (p=0.05), and job satisfaction (p=0.05), while the other dimensions showed no significant changes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>HFACS-RCA application offers a comprehensive framework for identifying and mitigating factors contributing to medical errors, improving patient safety, and setting a precedent for future healthcare safety management research and practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":13800,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Quality in Health Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Quality in Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzaf009","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Enhancing patient safety and minimizing medical errors are crucial in healthcare. While Root Cause Analysis (RCA) is commonly used to investigate adverse events, its lack of human factors integration limit its effectiveness. The Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS), adapted from aviation to healthcare, systematically identifies human and organizational factors. However, the integration of HFACS into RCA and the impact of HFACS-RCA implementation remain underexplored. Therefore, this study aims to: provide a practical case of HFACS integration into RCA and explore the effects of HFACS-RCA implementation.
Methodology: This study integrates HFACS into the RCA process at a medical center in Taiwan, examining an incident involving unsterilized instruments distributed from the Central Sterile Supply Room (CSR) to the ICU. This study employed a before-and-after study design to examine the impact of the HFACS-RCA intervention. The primary outcome measures were the changes in scores across the eight dimensions of the Taiwan Patient Safety Culture Survey (TPSC) before and after the intervention.
Results: A one-year follow-up of the CSR case showed no similar incidents. HFACS-RCA significantly improved TPSC scores in unit safety climate (p=0.05), feelings towards management (p=0.05), and job satisfaction (p=0.05), while the other dimensions showed no significant changes.
Conclusion: HFACS-RCA application offers a comprehensive framework for identifying and mitigating factors contributing to medical errors, improving patient safety, and setting a precedent for future healthcare safety management research and practice.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal for Quality in Health Care makes activities and research related to quality and safety in health care available to a worldwide readership. The Journal publishes papers in all disciplines related to the quality and safety of health care, including health services research, health care evaluation, technology assessment, health economics, utilization review, cost containment, and nursing care research, as well as clinical research related to quality of care.
This peer-reviewed journal is truly interdisciplinary and includes contributions from representatives of all health professions such as doctors, nurses, quality assurance professionals, managers, politicians, social workers, and therapists, as well as researchers from health-related backgrounds.