Efficacy and safety of dose-dense chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer under prophylactic pegfilgrastim administration: a systematic review and meta-analysis from clinical practice guidelines for the use of G-CSF 2022.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Takamichi Yokoe, Tetsuhiro Yoshinami, Kazuki Nozawa, Yukinori Ozaki, Hiroshi Nishio, Kenji Tsuchihashi, Eiki Ichihara, Yuji Miura, Makoto Endo, Shingo Yano, Dai Maruyama, Nobuyuki Susumu, Munetaka Takekuma, Takashi Motohashi, Mamoru Ito, Eishi Baba, Nobuaki Ochi, Toshio Kubo, Keita Uchino, Takahiro Kimura, Yutaro Kamiyama, Shinji Nakao, Shinobu Tamura, Hitomi Nishimoto, Yasuhisa Kato, Atsushi Sato, Toshimi Takano
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of dose-dense chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer under prophylactic pegfilgrastim administration: a systematic review and meta-analysis from clinical practice guidelines for the use of G-CSF 2022.","authors":"Takamichi Yokoe, Tetsuhiro Yoshinami, Kazuki Nozawa, Yukinori Ozaki, Hiroshi Nishio, Kenji Tsuchihashi, Eiki Ichihara, Yuji Miura, Makoto Endo, Shingo Yano, Dai Maruyama, Nobuyuki Susumu, Munetaka Takekuma, Takashi Motohashi, Mamoru Ito, Eishi Baba, Nobuaki Ochi, Toshio Kubo, Keita Uchino, Takahiro Kimura, Yutaro Kamiyama, Shinji Nakao, Shinobu Tamura, Hitomi Nishimoto, Yasuhisa Kato, Atsushi Sato, Toshimi Takano","doi":"10.1007/s10147-025-02716-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In early-stage breast cancer, dose-dense chemotherapy, which involves the administration of standard doses at shorter intervals, is safer when administered with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) to mitigate chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. This study aimed to thoroughly evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of dose-dense regimens based on the use of G-CSF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted according to the \"Minds Handbook for Clinical Practice Guideline Development\" using PubMed, Ichushi-Web, and the Cochrane Library databases. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies assessing dose-dense chemotherapy with prophylactic pegfilgrastim administration in early-stage breast cancer were included. Outcomes included overall survival, event-free survival, incidence of febrile neutropenia, quality of life (QOL), and pain. Meta-analyses were performed on outcomes with sufficient data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our literature search identified 23 RCTs. Overall survival and event-free survival showed a trend favoring dose-dense therapy (hazard ratio, 0.90, 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.78 - 1.03, 0.80 - 1.01; p = 0.13; 0.07, respectively). The incidence of febrile neutropenia was similar between the groups (odds ratio, 0.90; 95% CI 0.58 - 1.40; p = 0.65). Mortality due to infection could not be compared owing to the small number of events. Pain increased with dose-dense therapy (odds ratio 2.57; 95% CI 1.00 - 6.62; p = 0.05), likely from G-CSF-induced bone pain. Only one study examined QOL, showing a decline with chemotherapy that recovered after treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Dose-dense chemotherapy trended toward improved survival outcomes without increasing the risk of infection, although pain increased. Further research should identify the specific subgroups that most benefit from dose-dense regimens. More data are needed on the impact on QOL.</p>","PeriodicalId":13869,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"674-683"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-025-02716-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In early-stage breast cancer, dose-dense chemotherapy, which involves the administration of standard doses at shorter intervals, is safer when administered with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) to mitigate chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. This study aimed to thoroughly evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of dose-dense regimens based on the use of G-CSF.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted according to the "Minds Handbook for Clinical Practice Guideline Development" using PubMed, Ichushi-Web, and the Cochrane Library databases. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies assessing dose-dense chemotherapy with prophylactic pegfilgrastim administration in early-stage breast cancer were included. Outcomes included overall survival, event-free survival, incidence of febrile neutropenia, quality of life (QOL), and pain. Meta-analyses were performed on outcomes with sufficient data.

Results: Our literature search identified 23 RCTs. Overall survival and event-free survival showed a trend favoring dose-dense therapy (hazard ratio, 0.90, 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.78 - 1.03, 0.80 - 1.01; p = 0.13; 0.07, respectively). The incidence of febrile neutropenia was similar between the groups (odds ratio, 0.90; 95% CI 0.58 - 1.40; p = 0.65). Mortality due to infection could not be compared owing to the small number of events. Pain increased with dose-dense therapy (odds ratio 2.57; 95% CI 1.00 - 6.62; p = 0.05), likely from G-CSF-induced bone pain. Only one study examined QOL, showing a decline with chemotherapy that recovered after treatment.

Conclusions: Dose-dense chemotherapy trended toward improved survival outcomes without increasing the risk of infection, although pain increased. Further research should identify the specific subgroups that most benefit from dose-dense regimens. More data are needed on the impact on QOL.

预防性给药pegfilgrastim对早期乳腺癌剂量密集化疗的疗效和安全性:来自G-CSF 2022临床实践指南的系统评价和荟萃分析
背景:在早期乳腺癌中,剂量密集化疗,即在较短的间隔内给药标准剂量,当使用粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)来减轻化疗引起的中性粒细胞减少症时更安全。本研究旨在全面评估基于G-CSF使用的剂量密集方案的优缺点。方法:采用PubMed、Ichushi-Web和Cochrane图书馆数据库,根据《临床实践指南制定的头脑手册》进行系统评价。随机对照试验(rct)和队列研究评估了早期乳腺癌预防性给药聚非格拉西汀的剂量密集化疗。结果包括总生存期、无事件生存期、发热性中性粒细胞减少症发生率、生活质量(QOL)和疼痛。对数据充足的结果进行meta分析。结果:我们检索了23项随机对照试验。总生存期和无事件生存期倾向于剂量密集治疗(风险比,0.90,0.90;95%置信区间[CI] 0.78 ~ 1.03, 0.80 ~ 1.01;p = 0.13;分别为0.07)。两组之间发热性中性粒细胞减少的发生率相似(优势比,0.90;95% ci 0.58 - 1.40;p = 0.65)。由于感染造成的死亡率较少,因此无法进行比较。剂量密集治疗时疼痛增加(优势比2.57;95% ci 1.00 - 6.62;p = 0.05),可能来自g - csf诱导的骨痛。只有一项研究检查了生活质量,显示化疗后下降,治疗后恢复。结论:剂量密集化疗倾向于改善生存结果,而不会增加感染的风险,尽管疼痛会增加。进一步的研究应该确定从剂量密集方案中获益最多的特定亚组。对生活质量的影响需要更多的数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
3.00%
发文量
175
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Clinical Oncology (IJCO) welcomes original research papers on all aspects of clinical oncology that report the results of novel and timely investigations. Reports on clinical trials are encouraged. Experimental studies will also be accepted if they have obvious relevance to clinical oncology. Membership in the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology is not a prerequisite for submission to the journal. Papers are received on the understanding that: their contents have not been published in whole or in part elsewhere; that they are subject to peer review by at least two referees and the Editors, and to editorial revision of the language and contents; and that the Editors are responsible for their acceptance, rejection, and order of publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信