False Positives for Criterion A Trauma Events and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Symptoms with Questionnaires Are Common in Children and Adolescents and Could Not be Eliminated with Enhanced Instructions.
{"title":"False Positives for Criterion A Trauma Events and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Symptoms with Questionnaires Are Common in Children and Adolescents and Could Not be Eliminated with Enhanced Instructions.","authors":"Michael S Scheeringa","doi":"10.1089/cap.2024.0126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Objective:</i></b> Self-report questionnaires are common for measuring posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The experience of life threat-Criterion A-serves a gatekeeper function for diagnosing PTSD, and evidence suggests false positives are common on questionnaires. It remains unknown how common they are and whether extra instructions can reduce them. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> The present study assessed 42 youths, 10-17 years of age, from a clinic setting. Youths and parents completed regular PTSD questionnaires and then enhanced versions with more detailed instructions and examples of Criterion A and non-Criterion A events. Parents completed a semistructured interview as the verification of true versus false positives. <b><i>Results:</i></b> In the full sample, parents endorsed 41 and children endorsed 45 false positive events. The mean was significantly greater than zero for both parents and children. Parents endorsed 59 and children endorsed 138 false positive symptoms. When false positive events were endorsed, this was significantly associated with more false positive symptoms for both parents and children. An enhanced questionnaire failed to reduce false positive events for the full sample. <b><i>Discussion:</i></b> The common occurrence of false positives suggests caution is warranted when interpreting estimates from questionnaire-based research about the prevalence of PTSD. While this attempt to eliminate false positives was not fully successful, there may be other useful enhancements to consider in future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":15277,"journal":{"name":"Journal of child and adolescent psychopharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of child and adolescent psychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/cap.2024.0126","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Self-report questionnaires are common for measuring posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The experience of life threat-Criterion A-serves a gatekeeper function for diagnosing PTSD, and evidence suggests false positives are common on questionnaires. It remains unknown how common they are and whether extra instructions can reduce them. Methods: The present study assessed 42 youths, 10-17 years of age, from a clinic setting. Youths and parents completed regular PTSD questionnaires and then enhanced versions with more detailed instructions and examples of Criterion A and non-Criterion A events. Parents completed a semistructured interview as the verification of true versus false positives. Results: In the full sample, parents endorsed 41 and children endorsed 45 false positive events. The mean was significantly greater than zero for both parents and children. Parents endorsed 59 and children endorsed 138 false positive symptoms. When false positive events were endorsed, this was significantly associated with more false positive symptoms for both parents and children. An enhanced questionnaire failed to reduce false positive events for the full sample. Discussion: The common occurrence of false positives suggests caution is warranted when interpreting estimates from questionnaire-based research about the prevalence of PTSD. While this attempt to eliminate false positives was not fully successful, there may be other useful enhancements to consider in future research.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology (JCAP) is the premier peer-reviewed journal covering the clinical aspects of treating this patient population with psychotropic medications including side effects and interactions, standard doses, and research on new and existing medications. The Journal includes information on related areas of medical sciences such as advances in developmental pharmacokinetics, developmental neuroscience, metabolism, nutrition, molecular genetics, and more.
Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology coverage includes:
New drugs and treatment strategies including the use of psycho-stimulants, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, mood stabilizers, and atypical antipsychotics
New developments in the diagnosis and treatment of ADHD, anxiety disorders, schizophrenia, autism spectrum disorders, bipolar disorder, eating disorders, along with other disorders
Reports of common and rare Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) including: hyperprolactinemia, galactorrhea, weight gain/loss, metabolic syndrome, dyslipidemia, switching phenomena, sudden death, and the potential increase of suicide. Outcomes research.