The use of beta-blockers for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction in the era of SGLT2 inhibitors - are we still afraid to up-titrate?

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Fran Rode, Nikola Pavlović, Ana Jordan, Marija Radić, Ante Lisičić, Sanda Sokol Tomić, Jelena Kursar, Šime Manola, Ivana Jurin
{"title":"The use of beta-blockers for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction in the era of SGLT2 inhibitors - are we still afraid to up-titrate?","authors":"Fran Rode, Nikola Pavlović, Ana Jordan, Marija Radić, Ante Lisičić, Sanda Sokol Tomić, Jelena Kursar, Šime Manola, Ivana Jurin","doi":"10.1007/s00380-025-02525-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Beta-blockers are one of the four major pillars of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). The therapy has presented the best effects when up-titrated to evidence-based target doses. Despite their proven benefits, physicians have traditionally shown reluctance to up-titrate beta-blockers because of their negative inotropic and chronotropic effects. The effects of newly introduced sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2I) in treating HFrEF might open more room for adequate beta-blockers up-titration. The goal of this study was to evaluate the up-titration practice, and impact of target doses of beta-blockers in patients with HFrEF receiving SGLT2I. This is a prospective cohort study involving patients with HFrEF receiving SGLT2I therapy. Baseline use and dosing to the evidence-based targets were examined. We compared the groups of patients receiving maximally titrated beta-blockers versus incompletely titrated. Primary outcome was composite of (1) rehospitalization or revisit to emergency unit due to the heart failure; (2) all-cause death and major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Secondary outcomes were heart rate at rest, left ventricular ejection fraction, NT-proBNP, and NYHA status at 6 and 12 months of follow-up. Study endpoints were documented via telephone interviews, regular outpatient follow-up, or by electronic hospital records. This study included a total of 458 patients with median follow-up time of 365 (186-502) days. A total of 122 (26.6%) patients had beta-blockers maximally up-titrated. The results show that adherence to maximal target doses of β-blocker therapy significantly reduces hazard of death or MACE comparing to not using maximal doses of β-blocker (factor 0.43). Hazard reduction was not statistically significant for composite of rehospitalization or revisit to emergency unit due to HF. Maximal doses of beta-blockers did not result in a significant decrease in resting heart rate. Our real-world data have highlighted the prevalence of incomplete titration of beta-blockers. Although it has been shown that evidence-based target dosing of beta-blockers reduces death and MACE, there is still room for improvement with up-titrating beta-blockers in eligible patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":12940,"journal":{"name":"Heart and Vessels","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart and Vessels","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-025-02525-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Beta-blockers are one of the four major pillars of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). The therapy has presented the best effects when up-titrated to evidence-based target doses. Despite their proven benefits, physicians have traditionally shown reluctance to up-titrate beta-blockers because of their negative inotropic and chronotropic effects. The effects of newly introduced sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2I) in treating HFrEF might open more room for adequate beta-blockers up-titration. The goal of this study was to evaluate the up-titration practice, and impact of target doses of beta-blockers in patients with HFrEF receiving SGLT2I. This is a prospective cohort study involving patients with HFrEF receiving SGLT2I therapy. Baseline use and dosing to the evidence-based targets were examined. We compared the groups of patients receiving maximally titrated beta-blockers versus incompletely titrated. Primary outcome was composite of (1) rehospitalization or revisit to emergency unit due to the heart failure; (2) all-cause death and major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Secondary outcomes were heart rate at rest, left ventricular ejection fraction, NT-proBNP, and NYHA status at 6 and 12 months of follow-up. Study endpoints were documented via telephone interviews, regular outpatient follow-up, or by electronic hospital records. This study included a total of 458 patients with median follow-up time of 365 (186-502) days. A total of 122 (26.6%) patients had beta-blockers maximally up-titrated. The results show that adherence to maximal target doses of β-blocker therapy significantly reduces hazard of death or MACE comparing to not using maximal doses of β-blocker (factor 0.43). Hazard reduction was not statistically significant for composite of rehospitalization or revisit to emergency unit due to HF. Maximal doses of beta-blockers did not result in a significant decrease in resting heart rate. Our real-world data have highlighted the prevalence of incomplete titration of beta-blockers. Although it has been shown that evidence-based target dosing of beta-blockers reduces death and MACE, there is still room for improvement with up-titrating beta-blockers in eligible patients.

在SGLT2抑制剂时代,β受体阻滞剂用于射血分数降低的心力衰竭——我们还害怕提高滴定率吗?
β受体阻滞剂是指导药物治疗心力衰竭伴射血分数降低(HFrEF)的四大支柱之一。当剂量增加到循证靶剂量时,该疗法的效果最好。尽管受体阻滞剂的疗效已被证实,但由于其负性肌力和变时作用,医生传统上不愿增加受体阻滞剂的剂量。新引入的钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白2抑制剂(SGLT2I)在治疗HFrEF中的作用可能为适当的β受体阻滞剂的上升滴定开辟了更多的空间。本研究的目的是评估β受体阻滞剂靶剂量对接受SGLT2I治疗的HFrEF患者的滴定实践和影响。这是一项前瞻性队列研究,涉及接受SGLT2I治疗的HFrEF患者。检查了基线使用和以证据为基础的目标剂量。我们比较了接受最大滴度β受体阻滞剂和未完全滴度β受体阻滞剂的两组患者。主要结局为:(1)因心力衰竭再次住院或再次到急诊室就诊;(2)全因死亡和主要心脏不良事件(MACE)。次要结局是静息心率、左心室射血分数、NT-proBNP和6个月和12个月随访时的NYHA状态。研究终点通过电话访谈、定期门诊随访或电子医院记录进行记录。本研究共纳入458例患者,中位随访时间为365(186-502)天。共有122例(26.6%)患者β受体阻滞剂的效价最高。结果显示,与不使用最大剂量β受体阻滞剂相比,坚持使用最大目标剂量β受体阻滞剂治疗可显著降低死亡或MACE的风险(因子0.43)。因心衰而再次住院或再次到急诊室就诊的风险降低无统计学意义。最大剂量的受体阻滞剂没有导致静息心率的显著降低。我们的真实世界数据强调了β受体阻滞剂不完全滴定的普遍性。尽管有证据表明,β受体阻滞剂的靶向剂量可以降低死亡率和MACE,但在符合条件的患者中,β受体阻滞剂的滴度提高仍有改进的空间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Heart and Vessels
Heart and Vessels 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
13.30%
发文量
211
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Heart and Vessels is an English-language journal that provides a forum of original ideas, excellent methods, and fascinating techniques on cardiovascular disease fields. All papers submitted for publication are evaluated only with regard to scientific quality and relevance to the heart and vessels. Contributions from those engaged in practical medicine, as well as from those involved in basic research, are welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信