It's Like Adding a Drop of Ink to Milk and Shaking It: Newly Certified Peer Specialist Reflections on Lived Recovery Expertise and Professional Identity.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Community Mental Health Journal Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1007/s10597-025-01455-y
Elizabeth Siantz, Shanaya Fox, Emily Rougelot, Morgan Pelot, Laysha Ostrow
{"title":"It's Like Adding a Drop of Ink to Milk and Shaking It: Newly Certified Peer Specialist Reflections on Lived Recovery Expertise and Professional Identity.","authors":"Elizabeth Siantz, Shanaya Fox, Emily Rougelot, Morgan Pelot, Laysha Ostrow","doi":"10.1007/s10597-025-01455-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Self-disclosure of lived recovery experiences is a cornerstone of peer support work. However, few studies have explored how early career certified peer specialists (CPSs) integrate or plan to integrate their own lived recovery experiences into their CPS work, or the challenges they expect to experience when doing so. In this qualitative study, we explore how early career CPSs use their lived recovery experience and challenges that accompany self-disclosure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Qualitative data were collected as part of multistate, 3-year observational prospective cohort study of CPS graduate employment trajectories. We conducted in-depth, semi-structured interviews with a subsample of early-career CPSs about their transition to the workforce; this study reports on interview material focused on how participants use and expect to use their recovery experiences. Data were analyzed using thematic and content analysis informed by constant comparative methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>N = 25 individuals participated in an interview. While participants generally felt positive about sharing their personal recovery stories in their CPS role, some reported potential challenges they expect to experience, such as misalignment of recovery experiences or being re-traumatized when sharing their recovery stories with clients and coworkers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>That study participants held mixed feelings about sharing lived experience suggests that the peer support workforce needs early career professional support, such as peer-to-peer supervision models that focus on CPS wellbeing, in addition to job performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":10654,"journal":{"name":"Community Mental Health Journal","volume":" ","pages":"1148-1154"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Community Mental Health Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-025-01455-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Self-disclosure of lived recovery experiences is a cornerstone of peer support work. However, few studies have explored how early career certified peer specialists (CPSs) integrate or plan to integrate their own lived recovery experiences into their CPS work, or the challenges they expect to experience when doing so. In this qualitative study, we explore how early career CPSs use their lived recovery experience and challenges that accompany self-disclosure.

Methods: Qualitative data were collected as part of multistate, 3-year observational prospective cohort study of CPS graduate employment trajectories. We conducted in-depth, semi-structured interviews with a subsample of early-career CPSs about their transition to the workforce; this study reports on interview material focused on how participants use and expect to use their recovery experiences. Data were analyzed using thematic and content analysis informed by constant comparative methods.

Results: N = 25 individuals participated in an interview. While participants generally felt positive about sharing their personal recovery stories in their CPS role, some reported potential challenges they expect to experience, such as misalignment of recovery experiences or being re-traumatized when sharing their recovery stories with clients and coworkers.

Conclusion: That study participants held mixed feelings about sharing lived experience suggests that the peer support workforce needs early career professional support, such as peer-to-peer supervision models that focus on CPS wellbeing, in addition to job performance.

这就像在牛奶里加入一滴墨水,然后摇晃它:新认证的同行专家对生活康复专业知识和职业身份的反思。
自我披露康复生活经历是同伴支持工作的基石。然而,很少有研究探讨早期职业认证同行专家(CPS)如何将自己的生活康复经历整合或计划整合到他们的CPS工作中,或者他们在这样做时会遇到什么挑战。在本定性研究中,我们探讨了早期职业cps如何使用他们的生活恢复经历和伴随自我披露的挑战。方法:收集定性数据,作为CPS毕业生就业轨迹的多州,3年观察性前瞻性队列研究的一部分。我们对早期职业cps的子样本进行了深入的半结构化访谈,了解他们向劳动力的过渡;本研究报告的访谈材料侧重于参与者如何使用和期望使用他们的恢复经验。数据分析采用主题分析和内容分析,采用持续比较方法。结果:N = 25个人参加了访谈。虽然参与者普遍对在CPS角色中分享他们的个人康复故事持积极态度,但一些人报告了他们期望经历的潜在挑战,例如恢复经历的不一致,或者在与客户和同事分享他们的恢复故事时再次受到创伤。结论:研究参与者对分享生活经验的感受复杂,这表明同伴支持团队需要早期职业生涯的专业支持,比如除了工作表现外,还需要关注CPS健康的同伴监督模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
133
期刊介绍: Community Mental Health Journal focuses on the needs of people experiencing serious forms of psychological distress, as well as the structures established to address those needs. Areas of particular interest include critical examination of current paradigms of diagnosis and treatment, socio-structural determinants of mental health, social hierarchies within the public mental health systems, and the intersection of public mental health programs and social/racial justice and health equity. While this is the journal of the American Association for Community Psychiatry, we welcome manuscripts reflecting research from a range of disciplines on recovery-oriented services, public health policy, clinical delivery systems, advocacy, and emerging and innovative practices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信