Efficacy of intranasal dexmedetomidine-esketamine sedation for pediatric acceptance of facemask: single-center, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Kan Zhang, Guangxuan Zhang, Yanmei Zhang, Jingjing Wang, Jie Bai, Jijian Zheng, Yujuan Tao
{"title":"Efficacy of intranasal dexmedetomidine-esketamine sedation for pediatric acceptance of facemask: single-center, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial.","authors":"Kan Zhang, Guangxuan Zhang, Yanmei Zhang, Jingjing Wang, Jie Bai, Jijian Zheng, Yujuan Tao","doi":"10.1186/s12871-025-02939-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We compare the efficacy of intranasal dexmedetomidine (DEX) and DEX-esketamine sedation on pediatric acceptance of face mask.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center double-blind randomized controlled study was conducted at a tertiary hospital affiliated with Shanghai Jiao Tong University. Ninety children aged 1 year to 6 years old and scheduled for elective surgery were randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio into receiving DEX alone (n = 45) and DEX-esketamine (n = 45). DEX and esketamine were used intranasally at doses of 2 µg/kg and 2.0 mg/kg respectively. Children were assessed by an attending anesthesiologist with modified observer's assessment of alertness and sedation (MOAA/S), pediatric separation anxiety scale (PSAS) and mask acceptance scale (MAS). Perioperative adverse events (bradycardia, hypotension, hypoxia, emergence delirium etc.) were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 95 patients enrolled, 90 completed the study. The proportion of children who accepted facemask was significantly higher in the DEX-esketamine group compared to the DEX group (86.7% (39/45) vs. 62.2% (28/45), p = 0.008). Within 30 min after intranasal administration of agents, PSAS scores were similar between the two groups. Children in the DEX group were easily aroused when repositioned from the transferring bed to the operation table. In contrast, those in the DEX-esketamine group maintained a stable level of sedation (MOAA/S scores, median [25th- 75th interquartile range], 1 [1, 1] for DEX-esketamine vs. 2 [1, 4] for DEX, p < 0.001). Furthermore, subgroup analysis found that DEX-esketamine provided better facemask acceptance in children with high anxiety (PSAS ≥ 3). There were no significant differences in perioperative heart rate, noninvasive blood pressure and percutaneous arterial oxygen saturation between the two groups. Postoperative extubation time and perioperative adverse events were also comparable between the groups (all p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For preoperative sedation, combination of DEX with esketamine improved mask acceptance than dexmedetomidine alone, likely due to its superior anxiolytic effect in children with high anxiety.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Register (registration no. ChiCTR2400087873, registration date on 6/8/2024).</p>","PeriodicalId":9190,"journal":{"name":"BMC Anesthesiology","volume":"25 1","pages":"66"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11817246/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-025-02939-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: We compare the efficacy of intranasal dexmedetomidine (DEX) and DEX-esketamine sedation on pediatric acceptance of face mask.

Methods: This single-center double-blind randomized controlled study was conducted at a tertiary hospital affiliated with Shanghai Jiao Tong University. Ninety children aged 1 year to 6 years old and scheduled for elective surgery were randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio into receiving DEX alone (n = 45) and DEX-esketamine (n = 45). DEX and esketamine were used intranasally at doses of 2 µg/kg and 2.0 mg/kg respectively. Children were assessed by an attending anesthesiologist with modified observer's assessment of alertness and sedation (MOAA/S), pediatric separation anxiety scale (PSAS) and mask acceptance scale (MAS). Perioperative adverse events (bradycardia, hypotension, hypoxia, emergence delirium etc.) were recorded.

Results: Of 95 patients enrolled, 90 completed the study. The proportion of children who accepted facemask was significantly higher in the DEX-esketamine group compared to the DEX group (86.7% (39/45) vs. 62.2% (28/45), p = 0.008). Within 30 min after intranasal administration of agents, PSAS scores were similar between the two groups. Children in the DEX group were easily aroused when repositioned from the transferring bed to the operation table. In contrast, those in the DEX-esketamine group maintained a stable level of sedation (MOAA/S scores, median [25th- 75th interquartile range], 1 [1, 1] for DEX-esketamine vs. 2 [1, 4] for DEX, p < 0.001). Furthermore, subgroup analysis found that DEX-esketamine provided better facemask acceptance in children with high anxiety (PSAS ≥ 3). There were no significant differences in perioperative heart rate, noninvasive blood pressure and percutaneous arterial oxygen saturation between the two groups. Postoperative extubation time and perioperative adverse events were also comparable between the groups (all p > 0.05).

Conclusions: For preoperative sedation, combination of DEX with esketamine improved mask acceptance than dexmedetomidine alone, likely due to its superior anxiolytic effect in children with high anxiety.

Trial registration: This study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Register (registration no. ChiCTR2400087873, registration date on 6/8/2024).

右美托咪定-艾氯胺酮鼻内镇静对儿童接受口罩的疗效:单中心、双盲、随机对照试验。
目的:比较右美托咪定(DEX)与右美托咪定-艾氯胺酮鼻内镇静对小儿口罩接受度的影响。方法:在上海交通大学附属某三级医院进行单中心双盲随机对照研究。90名1 ~ 6岁择期手术的儿童按1:1的比例随机分为单独使用DEX (n = 45)和DEX-艾氯胺酮(n = 45)两组。DEX和艾氯胺酮鼻内剂量分别为2µg/kg和2.0 mg/kg。由一名主治麻醉师对患儿进行评估,采用改进的观察者警觉性和镇静评估(MOAA/S)、儿童分离焦虑量表(PSAS)和口罩接受量表(MAS)。记录围手术期不良事件(心动过缓、低血压、缺氧、出现性谵妄等)。结果:入组的95例患者中,90例完成了研究。DEX-艾氯胺酮组患儿接受口罩的比例明显高于DEX组(86.7%(39/45)比62.2% (28/45),p = 0.008)。经鼻给药后30分钟内,两组的PSAS评分相似。DEX组患儿从转移床移至手术台时易被唤醒。DEX-艾氯胺酮组保持稳定的镇静水平(MOAA/S评分,中位数[25 - 75分位范围],DEX-艾氯胺酮组为1 [1,1],DEX组为2 [1,4],p 0.05)。结论:术前镇静方面,右美托咪定联合艾氯胺酮比单用右美托咪定更能提高口罩接受度,可能是由于右美托咪定对高焦虑患儿的抗焦虑作用更强。试验注册:本研究已在中国临床试验注册(注册号:。ChiCTR2400087873,注册日期为6/8/2024)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Anesthesiology
BMC Anesthesiology ANESTHESIOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
349
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Anesthesiology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of anesthesiology, critical care, perioperative care and pain management, including clinical and experimental research into anesthetic mechanisms, administration and efficacy, technology and monitoring, and associated economic issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信