Implementation of an enhanced medication access workflow within a health-system specialty pharmacy: Impact on patient and clinician experience.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Brandon Harkonen, Anthony Cuttitta, James Henderson, Valerie Mefford, Jey McKibbin, Sherrie Luttman, Wendy Benedict, Lindsey R Kelley, Scott A Flanders, Hae Mi Choe, Geoffrey D Barnes
{"title":"Implementation of an enhanced medication access workflow within a health-system specialty pharmacy: Impact on patient and clinician experience.","authors":"Brandon Harkonen, Anthony Cuttitta, James Henderson, Valerie Mefford, Jey McKibbin, Sherrie Luttman, Wendy Benedict, Lindsey R Kelley, Scott A Flanders, Hae Mi Choe, Geoffrey D Barnes","doi":"10.1093/ajhp/zxaf023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The initiation of specialty medications is associated with patient access challenges and clinician burden. This evaluation assessed the impact on patient and clinician experience of an intervention to improve medication access by investing resources upstream of the prescribing step.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The specialty pharmacy intervention was designed to improve medication access within 5 medical specialty clinics by utilizing an embedded medication access team assigned to patients and prescribers of targeted medications. Using a multimethods evaluative approach to quantitatively assess associations between the referral process and patient experience, we analyzed the emotional valence of patient portal messages using a retrospective cohort study within the event study framework of a nonrandomized, stepped wedge implementation design. Semistructured qualitative interviews provided an understanding of clinician experience.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The intervention was associated with an increase in the net positive emotional valence of patient portal messages (average marginal effect, 5.3; 95% CI, 3.8-6.8; P < 0.001). Except for patients seen by gastroenterologists for irritable bowel disease, patients cared for in all other specialties experienced statistically significant increases in net positive valence in the primary analysis. Regarding clinician experience, 4 major interrelated themes emerged from 17 qualitative interviews with prescribers and pharmacists: (1) decreased clinician burden, general praise, (2) improved experience and satisfaction, reduced anxiety and concerns, (3) rewarding praise for other prescribers/colleagues, and (4) excellent coordination, efficiency, and speed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Investing staff resources before, during, and after the prior authorization process greatly improved clinician experience. The positive valence of patient portal messages also increased, suggesting patient experience improvements.</p>","PeriodicalId":7577,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy","volume":" ","pages":"e751-e759"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ajhp/zxaf023","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The initiation of specialty medications is associated with patient access challenges and clinician burden. This evaluation assessed the impact on patient and clinician experience of an intervention to improve medication access by investing resources upstream of the prescribing step.

Methods: The specialty pharmacy intervention was designed to improve medication access within 5 medical specialty clinics by utilizing an embedded medication access team assigned to patients and prescribers of targeted medications. Using a multimethods evaluative approach to quantitatively assess associations between the referral process and patient experience, we analyzed the emotional valence of patient portal messages using a retrospective cohort study within the event study framework of a nonrandomized, stepped wedge implementation design. Semistructured qualitative interviews provided an understanding of clinician experience.

Results: The intervention was associated with an increase in the net positive emotional valence of patient portal messages (average marginal effect, 5.3; 95% CI, 3.8-6.8; P < 0.001). Except for patients seen by gastroenterologists for irritable bowel disease, patients cared for in all other specialties experienced statistically significant increases in net positive valence in the primary analysis. Regarding clinician experience, 4 major interrelated themes emerged from 17 qualitative interviews with prescribers and pharmacists: (1) decreased clinician burden, general praise, (2) improved experience and satisfaction, reduced anxiety and concerns, (3) rewarding praise for other prescribers/colleagues, and (4) excellent coordination, efficiency, and speed.

Conclusion: Investing staff resources before, during, and after the prior authorization process greatly improved clinician experience. The positive valence of patient portal messages also increased, suggesting patient experience improvements.

在卫生系统专业药房实施增强型药物获取工作流程:对患者和临床医生体验的影响。
免责声明:为了加快文章的发表,AJHP在接受稿件后将尽快在网上发布。被接受的稿件已经过同行评审和编辑,但在技术格式化和作者校对之前会在网上发布。这些手稿不是记录的最终版本,稍后将被最终文章(按照AJHP风格格式化并由作者校对)所取代。目的:专科药物的启动与患者获取挑战和临床医生负担有关。该评估评估了通过在处方步骤的上游投入资源来改善药物获取的干预措施对患者和临床医生经验的影响。方法:在5个医学专科诊所内,通过对患者和目标药物的处方者分配嵌入式药物获取小组,设计专业药房干预以改善药物可及性。采用多方法评估方法定量评估转诊过程与患者体验之间的关系,我们在非随机、阶梯楔形实施设计的事件研究框架内,采用回顾性队列研究分析了患者门户信息的情感效价。半结构化定性访谈提供了对临床医生经验的理解。结果:干预与患者门户信息的净积极情绪效价增加有关(平均边际效应,5.3;95% ci, 3.8-6.8;P < 0.001)。除了胃肠病学家因肠易激病就诊的患者外,所有其他专科的患者在初步分析中均经历了统计上显著的净阳性价增加。关于临床医生的经验,从对处方医生和药剂师的17次定性访谈中得出了4个主要的相互关联的主题:(1)减轻了临床医生的负担,得到了普遍的赞扬;(2)提高了经验和满意度,减少了焦虑和担忧;(3)对其他处方医生/同事的赞扬;(4)出色的协调、效率和速度。结论:在事前授权流程前、中、后投入人力资源,极大地改善了临床医生的体验。患者门户信息的正效价也有所增加,表明患者体验有所改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
18.50%
发文量
341
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy (AJHP) is the official publication of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP). It publishes peer-reviewed scientific papers on contemporary drug therapy and pharmacy practice innovations in hospitals and health systems. With a circulation of more than 43,000, AJHP is the most widely recognized and respected clinical pharmacy journal in the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信