A descriptive, retrospective single-centre study of air-leak syndrome in intensive care unit patients with COVID-19.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Alice Löwing Jensen, Jacob Litorell, Jonathan Grip, Martin Dahlberg, Eva Joelsson-Alm, Sandra Jonmarker
{"title":"A descriptive, retrospective single-centre study of air-leak syndrome in intensive care unit patients with COVID-19.","authors":"Alice Löwing Jensen, Jacob Litorell, Jonathan Grip, Martin Dahlberg, Eva Joelsson-Alm, Sandra Jonmarker","doi":"10.1111/aas.14582","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute respiratory failure is the predominant presentation of intensive care unit (ICU) patients with COVID-19, and lung protective strategies are recommended to mitigate additional respiratory complications such as air-leak syndrome. The aim of this study is to investigate the prevalence, type, and timing of air-leak syndrome with regards to associated factors and patient outcome in patients with COVID-19 in ICUs at a large Swedish emergency hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included all adult patients admitted to an ICU for COVID-19-related respiratory failure at Södersjukhuset between March 6, 2020, and June 6, 2021. Primary outcomes were proportion of patients diagnosed with air-leak syndrome and its different types of manifestations, and timing of diagnoses in relation to ICU admission and initiation of invasive ventilation. Secondary outcomes included the highest level of respiratory support prior to the diagnosis of air-leak syndrome, patient characteristics and treatment variables associated with air-leak syndrome, and 90-day mortality for patients with air-leak syndrome compared to those without.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of a total of 669 patients, 81 (12%) were diagnosed with air-leak syndrome. Air-leak syndrome manifested as pneumomediastinum (PMD) (n = 58, 72%), pneumothorax (PTX) (n = 43, 53%), subcutaneous emphysema (SCE) (n = 28, 35%) and pneumatocele (PC) (n = 4, 4.9%). Air-leak syndrome was diagnosed at a median of 14 days (IQR 6-22) after ICU admission and 12 days (IQR 6-19) following the initiation of invasive ventilation. The highest respiratory support prior to diagnosis was invasive ventilation (IV) in 64 patients (79%), non-invasive ventilation in two patients (2.5%), and low- or high-flow oxygen in 15 patients (19%). Multiple logistic regression showed that pulmonary disease at baseline (OR 1.87, 95% CI 1.07-3.25), a lower body mass index (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.9-0.99), admission later compared with earlier in the pandemic (OR 3.89, 95% CI 2.14-7.08), and IV (OR 3.92, 95% CI 2.07-7.44) were associated with an increased risk of air-leak syndrome. Compared with patients not diagnosed with air-leak syndrome, patients with air-leaks had a higher mortality at 90 days after ICU admission, 46% versus 26% (p <.001). However, the mortality rate differed with different air-leak manifestations, 47% for PMD, 47% for PTX, 50% for the combination of both PMD and PTX and 0% in patients with only SCE and/or PC, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In 669 ICU patients with COVID-19, 12% had one or more manifestations of air-leak syndrome. Notably, PMD, rather than PTX, was the most common manifestation, suggesting a potentially distinctive feature of COVID-19-related air-leak syndrome. Further research is needed to determine whether COVID-19 involves different pathophysiological or iatrogenic mechanisms compared with other critical respiratory conditions.</p><p><strong>Registration of clinical trial: </strong>Clinicaltrials.gov, identifying number, NCT05877443.</p><p><strong>Editorial comment: </strong>This single-centre cohort study of air leakage into soft tissue in ventilated COVID cases presents findings for associated factors and clinical manifestations, including with different COVID-19 periods and treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":6909,"journal":{"name":"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica","volume":"69 3","pages":"e14582"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11816560/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.14582","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Acute respiratory failure is the predominant presentation of intensive care unit (ICU) patients with COVID-19, and lung protective strategies are recommended to mitigate additional respiratory complications such as air-leak syndrome. The aim of this study is to investigate the prevalence, type, and timing of air-leak syndrome with regards to associated factors and patient outcome in patients with COVID-19 in ICUs at a large Swedish emergency hospital.

Methods: This retrospective study included all adult patients admitted to an ICU for COVID-19-related respiratory failure at Södersjukhuset between March 6, 2020, and June 6, 2021. Primary outcomes were proportion of patients diagnosed with air-leak syndrome and its different types of manifestations, and timing of diagnoses in relation to ICU admission and initiation of invasive ventilation. Secondary outcomes included the highest level of respiratory support prior to the diagnosis of air-leak syndrome, patient characteristics and treatment variables associated with air-leak syndrome, and 90-day mortality for patients with air-leak syndrome compared to those without.

Results: Out of a total of 669 patients, 81 (12%) were diagnosed with air-leak syndrome. Air-leak syndrome manifested as pneumomediastinum (PMD) (n = 58, 72%), pneumothorax (PTX) (n = 43, 53%), subcutaneous emphysema (SCE) (n = 28, 35%) and pneumatocele (PC) (n = 4, 4.9%). Air-leak syndrome was diagnosed at a median of 14 days (IQR 6-22) after ICU admission and 12 days (IQR 6-19) following the initiation of invasive ventilation. The highest respiratory support prior to diagnosis was invasive ventilation (IV) in 64 patients (79%), non-invasive ventilation in two patients (2.5%), and low- or high-flow oxygen in 15 patients (19%). Multiple logistic regression showed that pulmonary disease at baseline (OR 1.87, 95% CI 1.07-3.25), a lower body mass index (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.9-0.99), admission later compared with earlier in the pandemic (OR 3.89, 95% CI 2.14-7.08), and IV (OR 3.92, 95% CI 2.07-7.44) were associated with an increased risk of air-leak syndrome. Compared with patients not diagnosed with air-leak syndrome, patients with air-leaks had a higher mortality at 90 days after ICU admission, 46% versus 26% (p <.001). However, the mortality rate differed with different air-leak manifestations, 47% for PMD, 47% for PTX, 50% for the combination of both PMD and PTX and 0% in patients with only SCE and/or PC, respectively.

Conclusion: In 669 ICU patients with COVID-19, 12% had one or more manifestations of air-leak syndrome. Notably, PMD, rather than PTX, was the most common manifestation, suggesting a potentially distinctive feature of COVID-19-related air-leak syndrome. Further research is needed to determine whether COVID-19 involves different pathophysiological or iatrogenic mechanisms compared with other critical respiratory conditions.

Registration of clinical trial: Clinicaltrials.gov, identifying number, NCT05877443.

Editorial comment: This single-centre cohort study of air leakage into soft tissue in ventilated COVID cases presents findings for associated factors and clinical manifestations, including with different COVID-19 periods and treatments.

COVID-19重症监护病房患者漏气综合征的描述性、回顾性单中心研究
背景:急性呼吸衰竭是COVID-19重症监护病房(ICU)患者的主要表现,建议采取肺保护策略来减轻额外的呼吸并发症,如漏气综合征。本研究的目的是调查瑞典一家大型急救医院重症监护室COVID-19患者中漏气综合征的患病率、类型和时间与相关因素和患者预后的关系。方法:本回顾性研究纳入了2020年3月6日至2021年6月6日期间在Södersjukhuset因covid -19相关呼吸衰竭入住ICU的所有成年患者。主要观察指标为漏气综合征患者的比例及其不同类型的表现,以及诊断时间与ICU住院和开始有创通气的关系。次要结局包括漏气综合征诊断前的最高呼吸支持水平、与漏气综合征相关的患者特征和治疗变量,以及漏气综合征患者与无漏气综合征患者相比的90天死亡率。结果:669例患者中,81例(12%)被诊断为漏气综合征。漏气综合征表现为纵隔气肿(PMD) (n = 58, 72%)、气胸(n = 43, 53%)、皮下肺气肿(SCE) (n = 28, 35%)、气腹膨出(PC) (n = 4, 4.9%)。漏气综合征的诊断中位时间为ICU入院后14天(IQR 6-22),开始有创通气后12天(IQR 6-19)。诊断前最高的呼吸支持是有创通气(IV) 64例(79%),无创通气2例(2.5%),低流量或高流量吸氧15例(19%)。多元logistic回归显示,基线时肺部疾病(OR 1.87, 95% CI 1.07-3.25)、较低的体重指数(OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.99 -0.99)、入院时间较大流行早期晚(OR 3.89, 95% CI 2.14-7.08)和IV期(OR 3.92, 95% CI 2.07-7.44)与漏气综合征的风险增加相关。与未诊断为漏气综合征的患者相比,漏气患者在ICU入院后90天的死亡率更高,分别为46%和26% (p结论:在669例COVID-19 ICU患者中,12%的患者有一种或多种漏气综合征的表现。值得注意的是,PMD而不是PTX是最常见的表现,这表明与covid -19相关的漏气综合征可能具有独特的特征。与其他严重呼吸系统疾病相比,COVID-19是否涉及不同的病理生理或医源性机制,需要进一步研究。临床试验注册:Clinicaltrials.gov,识别号:NCT05877443。编者评论:这项关于通气COVID病例软组织漏气的单中心队列研究提出了相关因素和临床表现的发现,包括不同的COVID-19时期和治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
9.50%
发文量
157
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica publishes papers on original work in the fields of anaesthesiology, intensive care, pain, emergency medicine, and subjects related to their basic sciences, on condition that they are contributed exclusively to this Journal. Case reports and short communications may be considered for publication if of particular interest; also letters to the Editor, especially if related to already published material. The editorial board is free to discuss the publication of reviews on current topics, the choice of which, however, is the prerogative of the board. Every effort will be made by the Editors and selected experts to expedite a critical review of manuscripts in order to ensure rapid publication of papers of a high scientific standard.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信