Optimizing eDNA Metabarcoding Techniques for Assessing Arthropod Communities in Tree-Related Microhabitats

Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Mohammad Jamil Shuvo, Tasmina Tabassum, Gernot Segelbacher
{"title":"Optimizing eDNA Metabarcoding Techniques for Assessing Arthropod Communities in Tree-Related Microhabitats","authors":"Mohammad Jamil Shuvo,&nbsp;Tasmina Tabassum,&nbsp;Gernot Segelbacher","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Understanding the diversity and ecological roles of arthropods within tree-related microhabitats (TreMs) is crucial for forest ecosystem conservation and management. In our study, we aimed to identify the most effective environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding approach for capturing ecologically important arthropod species primarily inhabiting the near-ground-level TreMs. We evaluated the use of COI and 16S primers for eDNA metabarcoding and compared direct and indirect eDNA sampling methods, including lying deadwood sediment sampling (LDS), standing deadwood sediment sampling (SDS), soil sampling (SS), and tree surface roller sampling (TSRS). Our results indicated significant biases and challenges, particularly in primer selection, with COI outperforming 16S in taxonomic resolution for most arthropod taxa. Our TSRS method effectively captured 408 OTUs at the species level, with the highest number of ecologically significant arthropods associated with TreMs compared to other approaches. Direct sampling from sediments revealed a higher abundance of fungi than arthropods, impacting diversity estimates. We also observed habitat-specific preferences among arthropods, with certain sampling methods capturing distinct taxa. Our findings underscore the importance of carefully selecting sampling methods and validating primers in eDNA metabarcoding studies and provide insights into the complexity of arthropod communities in TreMs. Optimized methods will advance monitoring techniques for forest ecosystems and inform conservation efforts to preserve arthropod diversity in TreMs.</p>","PeriodicalId":52828,"journal":{"name":"Environmental DNA","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.70064","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental DNA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/edn3.70064","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding the diversity and ecological roles of arthropods within tree-related microhabitats (TreMs) is crucial for forest ecosystem conservation and management. In our study, we aimed to identify the most effective environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding approach for capturing ecologically important arthropod species primarily inhabiting the near-ground-level TreMs. We evaluated the use of COI and 16S primers for eDNA metabarcoding and compared direct and indirect eDNA sampling methods, including lying deadwood sediment sampling (LDS), standing deadwood sediment sampling (SDS), soil sampling (SS), and tree surface roller sampling (TSRS). Our results indicated significant biases and challenges, particularly in primer selection, with COI outperforming 16S in taxonomic resolution for most arthropod taxa. Our TSRS method effectively captured 408 OTUs at the species level, with the highest number of ecologically significant arthropods associated with TreMs compared to other approaches. Direct sampling from sediments revealed a higher abundance of fungi than arthropods, impacting diversity estimates. We also observed habitat-specific preferences among arthropods, with certain sampling methods capturing distinct taxa. Our findings underscore the importance of carefully selecting sampling methods and validating primers in eDNA metabarcoding studies and provide insights into the complexity of arthropod communities in TreMs. Optimized methods will advance monitoring techniques for forest ecosystems and inform conservation efforts to preserve arthropod diversity in TreMs.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental DNA
Environmental DNA Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信