HLA evolutionary divergence score after donor lymphocyte infusion following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

IF 7.6 2区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY
HemaSphere Pub Date : 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1002/hem3.70088
Sophie Le Grand, Juliette Villemonteix, Etienne Daguindau, Marylise Fort, Sophie Caillat-Zucman, Vincent Allain, Anne Dormoy, Veronique De Mas, Eric Delabesse, Christian Recher, Regis Peffault de Latour, Nicolas Vallet, David Michonneau, Sarah Guenounou, Anne Huynh
{"title":"HLA evolutionary divergence score after donor lymphocyte infusion following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation","authors":"Sophie Le Grand,&nbsp;Juliette Villemonteix,&nbsp;Etienne Daguindau,&nbsp;Marylise Fort,&nbsp;Sophie Caillat-Zucman,&nbsp;Vincent Allain,&nbsp;Anne Dormoy,&nbsp;Veronique De Mas,&nbsp;Eric Delabesse,&nbsp;Christian Recher,&nbsp;Regis Peffault de Latour,&nbsp;Nicolas Vallet,&nbsp;David Michonneau,&nbsp;Sarah Guenounou,&nbsp;Anne Huynh","doi":"10.1002/hem3.70088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) prevents acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) relapses following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Given the life-threatening toxicities such as graft versus host disease (GVHD), the identification of variables associated with response without toxicities is warranted. We hypothesized that HLA evolutionary divergence (HED), defined by the diversity between two given alleles of the same HLA gene, may be such a factor. A retrospective multicenter case-control study was conducted to evaluate the outcomes of pre-emptive (preDLI) and prophylactic DLI (proDLI) regarding their HED score, in AML or MDS patients. DLI-treated patients were matched with controls (1:2 matched) from French transplantation centers according to hospital, hemopathy, donor type, and risk classification. In total, 201 patients were included (<i>N</i> = 147 in the preDLI group, <i>N</i> = 54 in the proDLI group). Relapse-free survival was significantly better in the preDLI group (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.23, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.14–0.55, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) than in controls. However, this benefit was offset by a higher incidence of severe GVHD (HR = 4.88, 95% CI: 2.30–10.32, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). HED A, B, C, DQA1, DQB1, DPB1, and DRB1 were calculated for 65 DLI-treated patients. High-class II HED was significantly associated with higher GVHD and relapse-free survival (GRFS, HR = 0.33, 95% CI: 0.20–0.77, <i>p</i> = 0.005). Specific DQAB associations directly improved GRFS (HR = 0.23, 95% CI: 0.09–0.58, <i>p</i> = 0.004). In conclusion, screening the class II HED score identifies patients eligible for DLI treatment who will benefit the most from this strategy.</p>","PeriodicalId":12982,"journal":{"name":"HemaSphere","volume":"9 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hem3.70088","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HemaSphere","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hem3.70088","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) prevents acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) relapses following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Given the life-threatening toxicities such as graft versus host disease (GVHD), the identification of variables associated with response without toxicities is warranted. We hypothesized that HLA evolutionary divergence (HED), defined by the diversity between two given alleles of the same HLA gene, may be such a factor. A retrospective multicenter case-control study was conducted to evaluate the outcomes of pre-emptive (preDLI) and prophylactic DLI (proDLI) regarding their HED score, in AML or MDS patients. DLI-treated patients were matched with controls (1:2 matched) from French transplantation centers according to hospital, hemopathy, donor type, and risk classification. In total, 201 patients were included (N = 147 in the preDLI group, N = 54 in the proDLI group). Relapse-free survival was significantly better in the preDLI group (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.23, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.14–0.55, p < 0.001) than in controls. However, this benefit was offset by a higher incidence of severe GVHD (HR = 4.88, 95% CI: 2.30–10.32, p < 0.001). HED A, B, C, DQA1, DQB1, DPB1, and DRB1 were calculated for 65 DLI-treated patients. High-class II HED was significantly associated with higher GVHD and relapse-free survival (GRFS, HR = 0.33, 95% CI: 0.20–0.77, p = 0.005). Specific DQAB associations directly improved GRFS (HR = 0.23, 95% CI: 0.09–0.58, p = 0.004). In conclusion, screening the class II HED score identifies patients eligible for DLI treatment who will benefit the most from this strategy.

Abstract Image

异体造血干细胞移植后输注供体淋巴细胞后的 HLA 进化分化得分
供体淋巴细胞输注(DLI)可预防急性髓性白血病(AML)或骨髓增生异常综合征(MDS)在造血干细胞移植后复发。鉴于移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)等危及生命的毒性,确定与无毒性反应相关的变量是有必要的。我们假设HLA进化差异(由同一HLA基因的两个给定等位基因之间的多样性定义)可能是这样一个因素。进行了一项回顾性多中心病例对照研究,以评估AML或MDS患者中先发制人(preDLI)和预防性DLI (proDLI)对其HED评分的影响。根据医院、血液病、供体类型和风险分类,将dli治疗的患者与来自法国移植中心的对照(1:2匹配)进行匹配。共纳入201例患者(preDLI组N = 147, proDLI组N = 54)。preDLI组的无复发生存率显著优于对照组(风险比[HR] = 0.23, 95%可信区间[CI]: 0.14-0.55, p < 0.001)。然而,这种益处被严重GVHD的较高发生率所抵消(HR = 4.88, 95% CI: 2.30-10.32, p < 0.001)。计算65例dli治疗患者的HED A、B、C、DQA1、DQB1、DPB1和DRB1。高II级HED与较高的GVHD和无复发生存率显著相关(GRFS, HR = 0.33, 95% CI: 0.20-0.77, p = 0.005)。特异性DQAB关联直接改善GRFS (HR = 0.23, 95% CI: 0.09-0.58, p = 0.004)。总之,筛选II类HED评分可以确定有资格接受DLI治疗的患者,他们将从该策略中获益最多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
HemaSphere
HemaSphere Medicine-Hematology
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
4.50%
发文量
2776
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊介绍: HemaSphere, as a publication, is dedicated to disseminating the outcomes of profoundly pertinent basic, translational, and clinical research endeavors within the field of hematology. The journal actively seeks robust studies that unveil novel discoveries with significant ramifications for hematology. In addition to original research, HemaSphere features review articles and guideline articles that furnish lucid synopses and discussions of emerging developments, along with recommendations for patient care. Positioned as the foremost resource in hematology, HemaSphere augments its offerings with specialized sections like HemaTopics and HemaPolicy. These segments engender insightful dialogues covering a spectrum of hematology-related topics, including digestible summaries of pivotal articles, updates on new therapies, deliberations on European policy matters, and other noteworthy news items within the field. Steering the course of HemaSphere are Editor in Chief Jan Cools and Deputy Editor in Chief Claire Harrison, alongside the guidance of an esteemed Editorial Board comprising international luminaries in both research and clinical realms, each representing diverse areas of hematologic expertise.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信