“This is a service for people who can mobilise themselves”: Age and gender perspectives of multi-modal mobility as a service

IF 5.1 2区 工程技术 Q1 TRANSPORTATION
Rich C. McIlroy, Katie McPeake
{"title":"“This is a service for people who can mobilise themselves”: Age and gender perspectives of multi-modal mobility as a service","authors":"Rich C. McIlroy,&nbsp;Katie McPeake","doi":"10.1016/j.tbs.2025.100997","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Mobility as a Service (MaaS) has the potential to contribute to greater equity in transport, but it also holds the potential to contribute to greater inequity. The outcome depends on how MaaS is designed, implemented, and marketed. Evaluations of existing systems have yielded mixed results in this regard. Therefore, input from prospective end-users remains crucial for designing systems that cater to different people’s needs. This research gathered that input, exploring people’s experiences of multi-modal travel (i.e., the combination of two or more transport modes in one trip) and their perceptions of MaaS, in the context of age and gender, factors consistently highlighted in discussions of transport inclusivity and equity. Online focus groups were held with 146 residents of a region in southern England in which a MaaS app is being trialled. Thematic analyses were conducted on the responses to three questions: one regarding multi-modal travel, one addressing potential success and failure points for MaaS, and one exploring the types of information MaaS could include. Results highlighted some important differences in the needs of different groups and are discussed in terms of the challenges to overcome and the opportunities to capitalise on when designing inclusive MaaS systems that contribute to greater transport equity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51534,"journal":{"name":"Travel Behaviour and Society","volume":"40 ","pages":"Article 100997"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Travel Behaviour and Society","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214367X25000158","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mobility as a Service (MaaS) has the potential to contribute to greater equity in transport, but it also holds the potential to contribute to greater inequity. The outcome depends on how MaaS is designed, implemented, and marketed. Evaluations of existing systems have yielded mixed results in this regard. Therefore, input from prospective end-users remains crucial for designing systems that cater to different people’s needs. This research gathered that input, exploring people’s experiences of multi-modal travel (i.e., the combination of two or more transport modes in one trip) and their perceptions of MaaS, in the context of age and gender, factors consistently highlighted in discussions of transport inclusivity and equity. Online focus groups were held with 146 residents of a region in southern England in which a MaaS app is being trialled. Thematic analyses were conducted on the responses to three questions: one regarding multi-modal travel, one addressing potential success and failure points for MaaS, and one exploring the types of information MaaS could include. Results highlighted some important differences in the needs of different groups and are discussed in terms of the challenges to overcome and the opportunities to capitalise on when designing inclusive MaaS systems that contribute to greater transport equity.
“这是一项为那些能够动员自己的人提供的服务”:多式联运作为一项服务的年龄和性别视角
移动即服务(MaaS)有可能促进交通运输的更大公平,但它也有可能导致更大的不平等。结果取决于MaaS是如何设计、实现和营销的。对现有制度的评价在这方面产生了好坏参半的结果。因此,来自潜在最终用户的输入对于设计满足不同人需求的系统仍然至关重要。本研究收集了这些信息,探讨了人们在多式联运旅行(即在一次旅行中结合两种或两种以上的交通方式)中的体验,以及他们在年龄和性别背景下对MaaS的看法,这些因素一直是交通包容性和公平性讨论中强调的因素。英国南部一个地区正在试用MaaS应用程序,该地区的146名居民参加了在线焦点小组讨论。对三个问题的回答进行了专题分析:一个是关于多式联运的,一个是关于MaaS的潜在成功和失败点,一个是探索MaaS可以包括的信息类型。结果强调了不同群体在需求方面的一些重要差异,并就设计包容性MaaS系统时需要克服的挑战和利用的机会进行了讨论,这些系统有助于提高运输公平性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: Travel Behaviour and Society is an interdisciplinary journal publishing high-quality original papers which report leading edge research in theories, methodologies and applications concerning transportation issues and challenges which involve the social and spatial dimensions. In particular, it provides a discussion forum for major research in travel behaviour, transportation infrastructure, transportation and environmental issues, mobility and social sustainability, transportation geographic information systems (TGIS), transportation and quality of life, transportation data collection and analysis, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信